Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$69.41
▲ $0.89 (+1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/15 01:08 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/15/2026
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
$14.00B
Day Range
$67.59 - $69.73
52-Week Range
$58.16 - $83.64
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
MAS is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-5.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: -15.92
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
82/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
+5.6%
Median 40D Outcome
51/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+6.0% … +10.3%
🟡 Base
7%
+0.7% … +0.7%
🔴 Bearish
47%
-11.7% … -3.4%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 40 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +0.7%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
9 occurrence(s) · 44% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 40% (20%–64%) | -0.2% | -1.9% … +3.5% | -0.0% |
| 10D | 40% (20%–64%) | -2.2% | -4.7% … +4.4% | +0.3% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.7% | -4.0% … +6.6% | +0.8% |
| 40D | 60% (36%–80%) | +5.6% | -4.0% … +14.4% | +1.4% |
| 60D | 67% (42%–85%) | +5.2% | -6.0% … +18.4% | +1.9% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-17 | 82/100 | Downtrend | -12.2% | -10.2% |
| 2018-04-03 | 82/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -2.8% | -5.6% |
| 2023-09-18 | 81/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -4.5% | +16.9% |
| 2022-02-09 | 80/100 | Downtrend | -11.1% | -12.4% |
| 2023-03-13 | 79/100 | Consolidation | -3.5% | +9.2% |
| 2020-10-28 | 79/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +0.7% | +2.8% |
| 2024-06-26 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +14.4% | +23.8% |
| 2020-12-08 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +5.6% | +5.2% |
| 2021-09-22 | 78/100 | Downtrend | +7.2% | +21.7% |
| 2023-10-05 | 77/100 | Downtrend | +3.2% | +27.5% |
| 2020-02-26 | 77/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -23.0% | +1.4% |
| 2023-04-10 | 76/100 | Downtrend | +13.4% | +16.2% |
| 2024-12-20 | 75/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +6.8% | -6.4% |
| 2025-06-20 | 75/100 | Downtrend | +6.4% | +19.8% |
| 2025-09-26 | 74/100 | Consolidation | -3.3% | -8.8% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
42
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
16
Risk
54
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
62
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING MAS...
Recent media coverage of Masco has primarily focused on its stock performance and valuation, with analysts noting a modest 0.9% increase since its last earnings report and suggesting the stock may still be undervalued relative to its fair value. Additionally, Behr Paint Company, a subsidiary of Masco, announced its 2027 "Color of the Year," *Grounded*, celebrating its tenth anniversary of this tradition. The broader industrial sector, including Masco, has faced downturn pressures, though the company’s long-term shareholder returns remain positive. No major financial or operational crises were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Masco. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 4 vs. 4 out of the last 20 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
36
Fundamentals
62
Technical
16
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-7%
Market Narrative
38
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (75) reflects traders’ fixation on the 1.3% proximity to support, likely due to recent price action. Confirmation bias (10) may amplify this by reinforcing narratives over stagnant fundamentals. Herding (49) hints at relative underperformance, but momentum and sentiment remain neutral. The key question is whether traders will hold near support or exit, given no clear catalyst. Low FOMO/Panic scores suggest no extreme urgency, but anchoring could persist until a breakout or breakdown occurs.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 08:46 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"investors seem to be forecasting a downturn - over the past six months, the industry has pulled back by 1.5%"
"Masco stock has delivered a total return of 32.0% over the past five years... market price may still sit below an internally estimated intrinsic value"
"Behr Paint Company unveiled a new color, Grounded, as its 2027 Color of the Year"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between bullish cyclical optimism and cautious, fundamental skepticism. Mackay and Nelson’s near-perfect scores suggest they’d see this as a low-risk, cyclically favorable opportunity—perhaps undervalued in a broader market downturn or positioned near a bottom. Meanwhile, Marks and Housel’s mid-range endorsements imply a more measured, patient approach, valuing stability or slow growth over speculative potential. On the other end, Graham’s mixed verdict and Fisher/Lynch’s near-zero scores reveal deep skepticism: the stock lacks the clear margin-of-safety or growth premium those methodologies demand. Even Livermore’s low score underscores a technical divergence, warning of a downtrend that contradicts the bullish cyclical or fundamental narratives. The divide isn’t just about risk tolerance—it’s about whether the stock fits a *moment* (cycle-driven) or a *principle* (quality, value, or efficiency).
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 97
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 84
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 77
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 72
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 67
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 64
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 63
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 60
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 59
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 57
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 47
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 42
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 17
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 17
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
35.4%
Operating Margin
16.5%
Net Margin
10.7%
EBITDA Margin
18.5%
ROE
-437.8%
ROA
15.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.87
Cash
$647.00M
Total Debt
$2.94B
Current Ratio
1.81
Debt/Equity
-15.92
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 24.8.2026 | $0.320 |
| 22.5.2026 | $0.320 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.320 |
| 20.2.2026 | $0.320 |
| 19.2.2026 | $0.320 |
| 7.11.2025 | $0.310 |
| 6.11.2025 | $0.310 |
| 8.8.2025 | $0.310 |
| 7.8.2025 | $0.310 |
| 23.5.2025 | $0.310 |
| 22.5.2025 | $0.310 |
| 21.2.2025 | $0.310 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
-$0.88
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$4.82
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 12 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
StockStory · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
PR Newswire · 26.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
MT Newswires · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
Masco (MAS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 42/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MAS currently scores 42/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
MAS's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: -15.92; Current ratio: 1.81; Debt/equity: -15.92.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.26 (3y annualized return 8.3% / max drawdown 31.6%); Return on equity (ROE): -437.8% (negative).
Yes — MAS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denari Aine | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 2,650 | +2,650 | — |
| Sandeep Reddy | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 2,650 | +2,650 | — |
| Coombe Gary A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 2,650 | +2,650 | — |
| Ffolkes Marie A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 2,650 | +2,650 | — |
| O'HERLIHY CHRISTOPHER A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 2,650 | +2,650 | — |
| PAYNE LISA A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 2,650 | +2,650 | — |
| PLANT JOHN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 2,650 | +2,650 | — |
| Alexander Mark R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 2,650 | +2,650 | — |
| Stevens Charles K. III | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 2,650 | +2,650 | — |
| PAYNE LISA A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 16,487 | +2,650 | — |
| PLANT JOHN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 50,574 | +2,650 | — |
| Alexander Mark R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 23,469 | +2,650 | — |
| O'HERLIHY CHRISTOPHER A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 51,766 | +2,650 | — |
| Sandeep Reddy | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 10,460 | +2,650 | — |
| Stevens Charles K. III | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 18,090 | +2,650 | — |
| Coombe Gary A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 3,630 | +2,650 | — |
| Ffolkes Marie A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 24,517 | +2,650 | — |
| Denari Aine | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 13,970 | +2,650 | — |
| PAYNE LISA A | Open Market Sale | 7.3.2026 | 2,006 | -2,006 | $63.66 |
| PAYNE LISA A | Open Market Sale | 7.3.2026 | 14,729 | -14,729 | $63.66 |
| PAYNE LISA A | Open Market Sale | 7.3.2026 | 13,837 | -14,729 | $63.66 |
| PAYNE LISA A | Open Market Sale | 7.3.2026 | 1,929 | -2,006 | $63.66 |
| Shah Jai | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.3.2026 | 4,410 | -4,410 | $63.66 |
| Shah Jai | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.3.2026 | 45,966 | -4,410 | $63.66 |
| Eisman Heath M | Open Market Sale | 26.2.2026 | 12,510 | -747 | $71.92 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,266,339 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 9,333,031 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
70.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology