Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$12.02
▼ $0.18 (-1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/18 10:35 PM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$2.29B
Day Range
$11.99 - $12.50
52-Week Range
$8.98 - $17.70
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.11.2026
Support
$9.84
Resistance
$12.70
CHA is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-29.5% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 9/14 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.67 (3y annualized return -49.8% / max drawdown 74.3%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
73/100
Similarity
6
Historical Matches
67/100
Analog Quality
+8.5%
Median 40D Outcome
49/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
50%
+14.8% … +17.4%
🟡 Base
17%
+0.0% … +0.0%
🔴 Bearish
33%
-6.0% … -3.7%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 6 similar historical cases for this stock, 50% (95% CI 19%–81%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +7.4%.
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 33% (10%–70%) | -1.9% | -3.0% … +4.3% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 67% (30%–90%) | +1.7% | -6.8% … +9.8% | -0.4% |
| 20D | 50% (19%–81%) | +7.4% | -1.9% … +14.9% | -1.1% |
| 40D | 67% (30%–90%) | +8.5% | -3.4% … +13.2% | +4.3% |
| 60D | 100% (61%–100%) | +5.7% | +4.9% … +10.3% | +6.0% |
Sample size: 6 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 73/100 | Consolidation | +15.0% | +4.9% |
| 2026-03-17 | 62/100 | Consolidation | -7.2% | +6.3% |
| 2026-06-11 | 56/100 | High Volatility | -2.5% | +5.1% |
| 2026-04-15 | 51/100 | Consolidation | +0.0% | +11.7% |
| 2026-05-15 | 44/100 | Downtrend | +19.9% | +1.7% |
| 2026-03-31 | 29/100 | Downtrend | +14.7% | +30.4% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLY (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Chagee Holdings Limited (CHA) demonstrates a robust overall investor score of 86, driven primarily by strong technical performance and favorable news sentiment, though tempered by notable volatility risk. The technical category scores exceptionally high at 90, reflecting a bullish momentum profile with the stock trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 60.6—indicating healthy upward momentum. News sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, with recent earnings highlights emphasizing profitability growth and overseas expansion, though minor neutral/negative mentions of broader market movements do not overshadow the positive narrative. However, the risk category scores poorly at 42, primarily due to a high volatility profile (74.3% maximum drawdown over three years) and a negative Chaikin Oscillator (-0.72), signaling potential downside pressure. The stock’s 3.4% outperformance over the past three months relative to its index further underscores its recent resilience, but the volatility metrics serve as a critical cautionary note for investors.
The stock trades above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and an RSI of 60.6, indicating strong upward momentum and a bullish technical setup. The %K at 79.1 suggests neutral short-term momentum, though the overall trend remains positive.
Strong technical indicators often precede sustained price appreciation, making this a key driver of investor confidence in CHA’s near-term trajectory.
Recent news is predominantly positive, with earnings call highlights emphasizing profitability growth and overseas expansion, while broader market mentions are neutral or negative but do not outweigh the positive narrative. Four of five news items are either neutral or outright positive.
Favorable news sentiment can attract institutional and retail investors, potentially driving sustained demand and upward price movement.
The stock exhibits high volatility, with a 74.3% maximum drawdown over three years and a Chaikin Oscillator of -0.72, signaling potential downside pressure. The ATR (3.8% of price) further confirms elevated volatility.
High volatility increases the likelihood of sharp price swings, which can lead to significant losses for investors during downturns or market corrections.
StockIQ conclusion
Chagee Holdings Limited (CHA) presents a compelling case for investors with a strong technical foundation and positive news sentiment, supported by recent earnings growth and relative outperformance. However, the stock’s high volatility and negative volatility metrics introduce meaningful risk, particularly for those sensitive to drawdowns. The overall score of 86 reflects a balanced profile where strengths in technicals and news are partially offset by elevated risk factors. Investors should carefully weigh the potential for upside against the volatility exposure before making decisions.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/11/202681
This Week
85
7D Ago
↓ -4
Weakening
Technical
81
7D Ago: 88
↓ -7
News
100
7D Ago: 100
→ 0
Risk
42
7D Ago: 42
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
81
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $12.27
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $12.20
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $12.20
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $12.19
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $12.19
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $12.21
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $12.21
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $12.51
Evidence: 11 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $12.51
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $12.46
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $12.24
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $12.24
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
8d ago · $12.16
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
8d ago · $12.45
Evidence: +8.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $12.64
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
9d ago · $12.59
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
10d ago · $12.60
Evidence: +8.5pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
10d ago · $12.60
Evidence: 1.6x recent average volume
What happened after
10d ago · $12.37
Evidence: +6.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
10d ago · $12.37
Evidence: 2.1x recent average volume
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
81 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 5, 2026
Then
86
$11.66
Now
81
$12.02
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
81
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
🕵️ What the Detective found on CHA
Detective Score 70/100 · 2 signals convergingOverall, the signals found here lean positive.
🧠 What the Detective thinks
2 signals are currently converging on CHA at once — see each one broken down below, in plain language, with its own positive/negative read.
What this means now: Several different technical indicators are currently agreeing on the same direction at once — that's unusual; most days they contradict each other.
Why it matters: When several technical indicators agree at once, that's usually more reliable than any single indicator alone.
What this means now: The price has formed a distinct technical structure (a trading range, shakeout, or breakout) that the Wyckoff method treats as a key moment where big money is building or unwinding a position.
Why it matters: May provide an additional indication of trading structure, but is not proof of future direction.
📊 Historically, this signal type
This is not a prediction and not investment advice — just a plain-language read of real, already-computed signals. Full details: Stock Detective →
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Chagee Holdings Limited** highlights a stark contrast between its domestic and international performance. While the company faced declining revenue and competitive pressures in Greater China—including a drop in franchised teahouse sales—its overseas operations surged, with gross merchandise value (GMV) more than doubling year-over-year. Profitability improved significantly, with net income margins rising to 13.6%, prompting analyst upgrades and signaling a strategic pivot toward global growth.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Chagee Holdings Limited. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
30
Fundamentals
—
Technical
81
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests traders are fixating on a near-term resistance level (0.6% away), while euphoric momentum and extreme sentiment (100/100) create a narrative-reality disconnect. FOMO is active due to strong momentum and volume, but anchoring dominates as the stock tests a key psychological barrier. The key question is whether traders will hold or adjust expectations if the stock fails to break resistance. The gap between narrative (86) and reality (50) implies optimism may outpace fundamentals.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:37 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"overseas GMV surges 114% year-over-year, signaling a strategic shift toward sustainable growth"
"Net income margin jumps to 13.6% while overseas GMV surges"
"Macquarie analyst upgrades Chagee Holdings to Outperform"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 63/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Jesse Livermore’s documented principles, the model estimates a strong positive trend for CHA, while the efficient‑market view of Malkiel & Bogle yields a middling score reflecting only a weak case for out‑performance. The Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, and Graham‑Enterprising reads all sit at neutral 50 because the required balance‑sheet, valuation, or growth data are missing, leading to inconclusive assessments. In contrast, cycle‑oriented thinkers such as Howard Marks, Loeb, Marks‑Cycle, and Nelson assign lower scores, flagging valuation risk, late‑cycle positioning, and potential over‑bought conditions. Finally, crowd‑sentiment and volatility‑focused voices like Mackay, Schwager, Housel, and Smith either note modest excitement or deem the volatility unsuitable, resulting in modest to very low scores.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 63
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 54
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 53
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 38
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 34
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 22
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 9
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 0
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.12.2025 | $0.920 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 5.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Moby · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
MarketBeat · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 21.8.2026
Yahoo Finance Video · 30.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Chagee Holdings Limited (CHA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for CHA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
CHA's technical score is 81/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.67 (3y annualized return -49.8% / max drawdown 74.3%); Price is below the SAR point — downtrend; Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
Yes — CHA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 9 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lu Mian | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 33,726 | +33,726 | — |
| Xu Chi | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 21,089 | +21,089 | — |
| HUANG HONGFEI | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 32,208 | +32,208 | — |
| HU WEI JEN | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 23,006 | +23,006 | — |
| Yin Dengfeng | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 89,394 | +89,394 | — |
| Yin Dengfeng | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 80,427 | +80,427 | $3.76 |
| Yin Dengfeng | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 80,427 | -80,427 | — |
| Yin Dengfeng | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 347,653 | +80,427 | $3.76 |
| Yin Dengfeng | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 160,854 | -80,427 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
955,726 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,317,071 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
41.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology