Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$36.40
▼ $0.52 (-1.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:42 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$105.65B
Day Range
$36.16 - $36.56
52-Week Range
$23.64 - $37.52
Beta
—
Next Earnings
29.10.2026
Support
$31.89
Resistance
$37.52
+43.8% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 8/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.6% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
The stock receives an overall investor score of 85, reflecting a strong position driven by robust technical indicators and exceptionally positive news sentiment, while risk considerations temper the rating slightly. Technically, the price is trading above both the 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, the MACD histogram is positive, and the RSI sits at a healthy 63.9, all of which signal upward momentum. News coverage is uniformly favorable or neutral, earning a perfect 100 score, highlighting supportive corporate actions such as a share‑buyback programme and macro‑level factors like a strong bond market. Risk metrics are lower, with an ATR of 1.5% and a Calmar ratio of 1.95 indicating moderate volatility and drawdown potential, which brings the risk score down to 58 and prevents a higher overall rating.
Price is above the 50‑day and 200‑day averages, MACD histogram is positive, RSI is 63.9, and %K is in a neutral range.
These factors collectively indicate bullish momentum and price strength.
All news items are neutral or positive, including a share‑buyback program and favorable bond‑market dynamics.
Positive news reinforces investor confidence and supports price appreciation.
ATR is 1.5% of price and the Calmar ratio is 1.95 with a 19.9% max drawdown.
Higher volatility and drawdown risk moderate the overall attractiveness despite strong technical and news signals.
StockIQ conclusion
The stock’s high investor score stems from solid technical strength and very favorable news coverage, while moderate risk metrics keep the rating from being higher. The balance of bullish momentum and supportive market sentiment suggests resilience, though volatility and drawdown potential remain considerations.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
76
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $36.35
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $36.35
Evidence: 7 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $36.36
Evidence: 8 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $36.36
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $36.36
Evidence: attention score 62/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $36.78
Evidence: 8 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $36.78
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $36.96
Evidence: 8 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $36.96
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $37.03
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $37.27
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $37.27
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
15d ago · $37.18
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 1 to 41 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 11, 2026
Then
76
$36.67
Now
76
$36.40
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
70
Risk
58
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
11
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of ING Group centers on three main themes. First, ING is highlighted as a momentum stock, with analysts questioning its suitability for momentum investors. Second, the bank’s market‑view commentary appears in foreign‑exchange news, where ING’s Francesco Pesole comments on yen strength and dollar movements. Third, ING reports progress on its share‑buyback programme, while broader European banking news notes the sector’s improved lending‑income outlook driven by higher rates and strong loan growth.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about ING Group, N.V.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
47
Fundamentals
—
Technical
70
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+16%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+18
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ING’s psychology is dominated by anchoring, with traders fixating on the 0.3% gap below resistance, likely treating it as a near-term floor. FOMO and euphoric momentum (+7.2% ROC, RSI 73) coexist but are secondary, while herding remains muted. The key question: will traders break the resistance anchor, or will the 19.4% above 200-day avg. sustain euphoria? Narrative-reality gap (10) suggests optimism may outpace fundamentals.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:47 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"ING Groep stock has delivered very strong returns over the past few years, yet several valuation checks still suggest the current share price may not fully reflect its intrinsic value."
"ING Groep announced the resignation of Supervisory Board member Alexandra Reich from the bank's top oversight body."
"ING Says — The Bank of Canada is widely expected to hold rates..."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 79/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, the model estimates that Morgan Housel sees ING as a quiet compounder that a patient holder could stick with, reflected in his high score of 86. Gerald Loeb’s lower but still positive score of 70 aligns with a more conservative view, rating ING as a reasonable capital‑preservation play, while Jesse Livermore’s modest score of 63 finds no clear trend and suggests staying out. Several traditional value and growth investors—Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, and the enterprising Graham variant—gave ING a neutral 50 but all flagged insufficient data for a robust assessment, indicating the model cannot apply their full frameworks. More critical or macro‑oriented approaches assign lower scores: the efficient‑market duo rates it mixed, Howard Marks warns of risk/valuation caution, Jack Schwager sees no setup, Mackay flags a crowd delusion, the cycle‑focused Marks sees a late‑cycle environment, Veblen highlights growth pursued for its own sake, and Nelson warns of an overbought stretch, collectively painting a divergent picture of caution versus modest optimism.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 79
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 67
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 48
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 48
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 47
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 32
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.8.2026 | $0.458 |
| 17.4.2026 | $0.880 |
| 16.4.2026 | $0.880 |
| 25.4.2025 | $0.802 |
| 24.4.2025 | $0.802 |
| 13.1.2025 | $0.165 |
| 12.1.2025 | $0.165 |
| 8.8.2024 | $0.379 |
| 7.8.2024 | $0.379 |
| 24.4.2024 | $0.820 |
| 23.4.2024 | $0.820 |
| 11.8.2023 | $0.383 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Barrons.com · 18.9.2026
Barrons.com · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Barrons.com · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Barrons.com · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 14.9.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for ING Group, N.V. (ING) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for ING specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
ING's technical score is 70/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.6% of price; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — ING has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 14 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ING GROEP NV | Disposition to the Company | 9.3.2015 | 13,599,274 | -13,599,274 | $44.12 |
| ING GROEP NV | Open Market Sale | 9.3.2015 | 32,018,100 | -32,018,100 | $44.20 |
| ING GROEP NV | Disposition to the Company | 18.11.2014 | 4,469,987 | -4,469,987 | $39.15 |
| ING GROEP NV | Open Market Sale | 18.11.2014 | 30,030,013 | -30,030,013 | $39.15 |
| ING GROEP NV | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2014 | 22,277,993 | -22,277,993 | $38.85 |
| ING GROEP NV | Disposition to the Company | 8.9.2014 | 7,722,007 | -7,722,007 | $38.85 |
| ING GROEP NV | Disposition to the Company | 25.3.2014 | 7,255,853 | -7,255,853 | $34.45 |
| ING GROEP NV | Open Market Sale | 25.3.2014 | 30,475,000 | -30,475,000 | $35.23 |
| ING GROEP NV | Open Market Sale | 29.10.2013 | 37,950,000 | -37,950,000 | $29.50 |
| ING GROEP NV | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2013 | 9,778,696 | -9,778,696 | $19.50 |
| ING GROEP NV | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2013 | 26,050,846 | +26,050,846 | $48.75 |
| ING GROEP NV | Open Market Sale | 7.5.2013 | 34,423,077 | -34,423,077 | $19.50 |
| ING GROEP NV | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2012 | 54,028,086 | -54,028,086 | $55.25 |
| ING GROEP NV | Open Market Purchase | 23.7.2012 | 39,948 | +39,948 | $54.82 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,024,123 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,191,229 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
40.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology