Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$13.72
▼ $0.42 (-3.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:23 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$13.70 - $13.94
52-Week Range
$5.24 - $15.18
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.02.2027
Support
$10.25
Resistance
$15.18
SSL is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+104.8% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 9/12 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.03 (3y annualized return 2.3% / max drawdown 79.2%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Sasol (SSL) demonstrates a robust overall investor score of 82, driven primarily by strong technical indicators and positive news sentiment, though tempered by notable risk factors. The technical category scores exceptionally high at 90, reflecting a clear bullish momentum: the stock price sits above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, the MACD histogram indicates an upward trend, and the RSI of 57.5 suggests healthy positive momentum. News sentiment aligns favorably, with multiple positive reports highlighting debt reduction efforts, record production, and strong cash flow, though mixed messaging on debt reduction slightly offsets this. However, the risk category scores poorly at 42, primarily due to a high maximum drawdown of 79.2% over three years and a negative 3-year annualized return, signaling volatility and historical underperformance relative to peers. These risks contrast sharply with the technical and news-driven strengths, creating a nuanced outlook where short-term momentum and operational improvements are balanced against long-term volatility concerns.
The stock price exceeds both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, the MACD histogram shows positive momentum, and the RSI (57.5) reflects healthy upward momentum. The %K (69.3) remains neutral, indicating no extreme overbought conditions.
Strong technicals suggest near-term bullish momentum and potential for continued price appreciation.
Recent news highlights include debt reduction initiatives, record production, and strong cash flow, with multiple positive earnings call transcripts. However, conflicting reports on debt reduction slightly dilute the overall positivity.
Positive operational and financial news can attract investor confidence and support stock valuation.
The stock exhibits a high maximum drawdown of 79.2% over three years and a negative 3-year annualized return (-2.1%), alongside an ATR of 3.0% of the price, indicating volatility. The Sharpe ratio (-0.03) further suggests underperformance relative to risk.
High volatility and historical underperformance raise concerns about long-term stability and investor risk tolerance.
StockIQ conclusion
Sasol (SSL) presents a compelling short-to-medium-term case supported by strong technicals and positive news, particularly around operational improvements and debt management. However, its high historical volatility and underperformance over three years introduce meaningful risk, creating a mixed picture for investors. The stock’s trajectory will likely depend on sustained execution of strategic initiatives and external factors like commodity prices or macroeconomic stability. Without further clarity on volatility mitigation or long-term profitability trends, the current data suggests a balanced but cautious outlook.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
86
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $13.72
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $13.72
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $13.72
Evidence: -3.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $13.72
Evidence: -4.4pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $13.72
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $13.72
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $13.76
Evidence: -3.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $14.14
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $14.14
Evidence: 11 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $14.14
Evidence: -5.8pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $14.29
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $14.29
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $14.29
Evidence: -3.8pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $14.21
Evidence: -5.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $14.49
Evidence: attention score 63/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $15.11
Evidence: +3.5pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $15.11
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $15.11
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $14.92
Evidence: +3.2pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $14.71
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 10, 2026
Then
80
$14.58
Now
86
$13.72
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
89
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
🕵️ What the Detective found on SSL
Detective Score 70/100 · 2 signals convergingOverall, the signals found here lean positive.
🧠 What the Detective thinks
2 signals are currently converging on SSL at once — see each one broken down below, in plain language, with its own positive/negative read.
What this means now: Several different technical indicators are currently agreeing on the same direction at once — that's unusual; most days they contradict each other.
Why it matters: When several technical indicators agree at once, that's usually more reliable than any single indicator alone.
What this means now: The price has formed a distinct technical structure (a trading range, shakeout, or breakout) that the Wyckoff method treats as a key moment where big money is building or unwinding a position.
Why it matters: May provide an additional indication of trading structure, but is not proof of future direction.
📊 Historically, this signal type
This is not a prediction and not investment advice — just a plain-language read of real, already-computed signals. Full details: Stock Detective →
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Sasol Ltd highlights its strong fiscal 2026 performance, marking a notable turnaround. The company reported a **17% year-over-year increase in adjusted EBITDA (ZAR 61 billion)**, a **10-year low in net debt**, and **record production at Secunda**, reaching a five-year high. Improvements in operational reliability, refining margins, and cost discipline were emphasized, alongside progress in its International Chemicals reset. Overall, the focus remains on financial strength and operational efficiency amid chemical market challenges.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Sasol Ltd.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
45
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
51
Fundamentals
—
Technical
89
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+27%
Market Narrative
76
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+26
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
SSL’s psychology is dominated by **FOMO**, fueled by positive momentum (+1.4% ROC), elevated volume (1.52x avg), and strong sentiment (80/100). The RSI (58) and Bollinger %B (0.72) indicate controlled buying pressure, not panic. Anchoring (3.7% from resistance) may limit upside, while loss aversion (3-month decline) remains muted. The key question: *Will traders exit near resistance, or will sentiment sustain momentum?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 05:17 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"adjusted EBITDA jumped 17% year over year to ZAR 61 billion"
"Net debt fell to its lowest level in ten years"
"Secunda output hit a five-year high"
"stronger refining margins and progress in its International Chemicals reset"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 71/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Livermore's documented principles, the model estimates a positive trend, giving a score of 71, while Schwager's framework estimates no clear edge (score 44) and Nelson sees a mid‑cycle neutral stance (score 40). Based on Marks's documented principles, the model flags late‑cycle risk (score 26‑37) and Loeb highlights a capital‑threat risk (score 34). The efficient‑market view, using Malkiel & Bogle's principles, judges the case mixed (score 56) because there is insufficient evidence to outperform an index. Most other methodologies—Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot and their variants—return a default score of 50 and note a lack of dividend, balance‑sheet or growth data, leading to neutral verdicts. Consequently, the divergence among the scores reflects the varying data requirements of each historical approach rather than a consensus about the stock's attractiveness.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 71
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 56
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 44
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 40
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 34
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 34
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 26
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 7
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 0 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 14.3.2024 | $0.104 |
| 13.3.2024 | $0.104 |
| 14.9.2023 | $0.525 |
| 13.9.2023 | $0.525 |
| 9.3.2023 | $0.387 |
| 8.3.2023 | $0.387 |
| 8.9.2022 | $0.872 |
| 7.9.2022 | $0.872 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Fintel · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Motley Fool · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Motley Fool · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
MarketBeat · 1.9.2026
MT Newswires · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
PR Newswire · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
Fintel · 28.8.2026
PR Newswire · 10.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Sasol Ltd. (SSL) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for SSL specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
SSL's technical score is 89/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.03 (3y annualized return 2.3% / max drawdown 79.2%).
Yes — SSL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 2 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pillay Sarushen Dhanapalan | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 2,318 | +2,318 | — |
| Pillay Sarushen Dhanapalan | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 2,182 | -2,182 | $13.14 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,704,416 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,813,499 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
38.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 35.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology