Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$3.74
▲ $0.15 (+4.3%)
Market data updated: 09/18 12:31 PM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$3.63 - $3.89
52-Week Range
$1.68 - $6.45
Beta
—
Next Earnings
07.12.2026
YQ is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+16.0% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 10/15 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 11.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
The stock YQ carries an investorScore of 85 and a STRONG rating, reflecting a blend of robust technical indicators, favorable recent news sentiment, and notable risk considerations. Technically, the price sits above both the 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, the MACD histogram is positive, and the RSI at 65.5 indicates healthy upward momentum, all of which contribute to a high technical score of 92. Recent news headlines show multiple positive mentions of consumer discretionary stocks, reinforcing a bullish narrative and also supporting the news score of 92. However, the risk profile drags the composite assessment lower, with an ATR equal to 10.8% of price and a Kalmar metric indicating a modest negative three‑year annual return and a potential 72.2% maximum drawdown, resulting in a risk score of 34. The combination of strong momentum and sentiment with elevated volatility and downside potential explains why the overall score lands at 85 rather than higher. The strengths such as price above key averages and strong short‑term performance (+62% over three months) boost confidence, while the concerns around short‑term volatility and historical drawdown temper enthusiasm, leading to a balanced but still optimistic evaluation.
Price is above the 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, MACD histogram is positive, RSI is 65.5, and %K is neutral at 68.8, yielding a technical score of 92.
These metrics signal strong upward momentum and price strength.
Recent headlines contain multiple positive mentions of consumer discretionary stocks and mixed Asian equity coverage, resulting in a news score of 92.
Positive news flow can reinforce investor confidence and price appreciation.
ATR equals 10.8% of price and the Kalmar metric shows a -0.4% three‑year annual return with a possible 72.2% drawdown, giving a risk score of 34.
High volatility and potential large drawdowns increase investment risk.
StockIQ conclusion
YQ demonstrates strong technical momentum and favorable recent news, supporting its high investorScore despite notable risk factors such as elevated volatility and historical drawdown potential. While the strengths suggest continued upside, the risk metrics highlight the need for careful monitoring of price swings and broader market conditions.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/11/202679
This Week
82
7D Ago
↓ -3
Weakening
Technical
87
7D Ago: 85
→ +2
News
80
7D Ago: 98
↓ -18
Risk
34
7D Ago: 34
→ 0
Biggest Improvements
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
79
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $3.74
Evidence: +3.7pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $3.74
Evidence: 7 insider open-market buy(s) in the last 30 days
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $3.74
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $3.74
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $3.74
Evidence: +11.2pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $3.74
Evidence: +3.9pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $3.89
Evidence: +7.9pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $3.75
Evidence: +4.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $3.59
Evidence: +7.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $3.59
Evidence: 7 insider open-market buy(s) in the last 30 days
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $3.59
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $3.59
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $3.56
Evidence: attention score 82/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $3.56
Evidence: +6.2pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $3.50
Evidence: +4.6pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $3.35
Evidence: attention score 60/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $3.35
Evidence: 7 insider open-market buy(s) in the last 30 days
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $3.35
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $3.35
Evidence: 11 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $3.35
Evidence: -12.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
79 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 10, 2026
Then
79
$4.57
Now
79
$3.74
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
87
Risk
34
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
🕵️ What the Detective found on YQ
Detective Score 90/100 · 4 signals convergingOverall, the signals found here lean positive.
🧠 What the Detective thinks
מניית 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. (YQ) מציגה עכשיו תבנית חריגה מאוד: היא עולה במהירות עם עניין גבוה במיוחד (ווליום של כ-3.8 פעמים מהממוצע), ללא כל סימן לעצירה. בנוסף, אנשי מקצוע (כולל מנהלים) קנו מניות בשוק הפתוח בשבועות האחרונים, מה שמגביר את האמון. בנוסף, המניה זולה יותר ב-30 נקודות אחוזים מהממוצע בסקטור שלה, מה שמגדיל את הפוטנציאל לעלייה נוספת. כל הסימנים מתכנסים יחד בצורה נדירה.
What this means now: Several different technical indicators are currently agreeing on the same direction at once — that's unusual; most days they contradict each other.
Why it matters: When several technical indicators agree at once, that's usually more reliable than any single indicator alone.
What this means now: The price has formed a distinct technical structure (a trading range, shakeout, or breakout) that the Wyckoff method treats as a key moment where big money is building or unwinding a position.
Why it matters: May provide an additional indication of trading structure, but is not proof of future direction.
What this means now: Company directors or executives bought shares on the open market, with their own money, in the last month — not options, a real purchase.
Why it matters: Open-market insider buys are a real action with real money, not just an opinion.
What this means now: The stock moved a lot more (or less) today than the average of other stocks in its sector — it stands out relative to its peers.
Why it matters: A move that meaningfully outpaces its sector suggests something company-specific, not just a sector-wide trend.
📊 Historically, this signal type
This is not a prediction and not investment advice — just a plain-language read of real, already-computed signals. Full details: Stock Detective →
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **17 Education & Technology Group Inc.** has primarily focused on its financial updates and market activity. The company announced its second-quarter 2026 unaudited financial results and launched a $10 million share repurchase program, signaling confidence in its valuation. While broader market trends highlight fluctuations in its American Depositary Receipts, no substantive operational or strategic developments were detailed.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about 17 Education & Technology Group Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
62
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
69
Fundamentals
—
Technical
87
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+60%
Market Narrative
80
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+30
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here is dominated by **FOMO and euphoria**, with extreme momentum, volume, and overbought conditions reinforcing speculative buying. Herding is active but secondary, as the stock’s outperformance relative to peers suggests contagion rather than independent conviction. The **narrative-reality gap (32)** hints at detached optimism, while anchoring near resistance may limit further upside. The key question: *Will traders sustain momentum despite overbought signals, or will volume taper as euphoria peaks?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:47 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Asian equities traded in the US as American Depositary Receipts **Decline in Tuesday Trading** (article 2)"
"17 Education & Technology Group Inc. to report its unaudited financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026, on September 8, 2026 (article 11)"
"17 Education & Technology Group Inc. announced a new **Share Repurchase Program of Up to US$10 Million** (article 6)"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Thorstein Veblen — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between momentum-driven traders and more cautious or fundamental investors. Jesse Livermore and Thorstein Veblen both see strong potential here—Livermore’s high score reflects a clear upward price trend he’d exploit, while Veblen’s endorsement aligns with real economic growth signals. However, the majority of methodologies—particularly those rooted in deep valuation, risk assessment, or market psychology—sound alarms. Graham, Fisher, and Lynch all lack sufficient data to form a conviction, while Howard Marks and Gerald Loeb flag concerning risk/valuation dynamics or speculative excesses. Even the efficient-market camp dismisses it as unworthy of active picking, and the lowest scorers, like Nelson and Housel, warn of overbought conditions or volatility that could trigger panic selling. The contrast highlights a stock that may appeal to short-term traders but lacks the structural fundamentals or defensive traits favored by long-term, risk-averse investors.
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 76
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 40
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 31
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 29
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 3 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. (YQ) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for YQ specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
YQ's technical score is 87/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 11.1% of price; Calmar: 0.01 (3y annualized return 0.4% / max drawdown 72.2%); Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for YQ.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 9 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu Chang | Open Market Purchase | 3.9.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $2.38 |
| Liu Chang | Open Market Purchase | 2.9.2026 | 9,055 | +9,055 | $2.19 |
| Liu Chang | L | 1.9.2026 | 500 | +500 | $2.05 |
| Liu Chang | L | 31.8.2026 | 729 | +729 | $2.08 |
| Liu Chang | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 4,001 | +4,001 | $2.11 |
| Liu Chang | L | 27.8.2026 | 1,658 | +1,658 | $2.19 |
| Liu Chang | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 9,216 | +9,216 | $2.16 |
| Liu Chang | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 86,905 | +9,216 | $2.16 |
| Liu Chang | L | 25.8.2026 | 1,359 | +1,359 | $2.33 |
| Liu Chang | L | 25.8.2026 | 77,689 | +1,359 | $2.33 |
| Liu Chang | L | 24.8.2026 | 481 | +481 | $2.37 |
| Liu Chang | L | 24.8.2026 | 76,330 | +481 | $2.37 |
| Liu Chang | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 846 | +846 | $2.46 |
| Liu Chang | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 75,849 | +846 | $2.46 |
| Liu Chang | L | 20.8.2026 | 2,837 | +2,837 | $2.46 |
| Liu Chang | L | 20.8.2026 | 75,003 | +2,837 | $2.46 |
| Liu Chang | L | 19.8.2026 | 572 | +572 | $2.26 |
| Liu Chang | L | 19.8.2026 | 72,166 | +572 | $2.26 |
| Liu Chang | L | 17.8.2026 | 294 | +294 | $2.28 |
| Liu Chang | L | 17.8.2026 | 71,594 | +294 | $2.28 |
| Liu Chang | L | 14.8.2026 | 221 | +221 | $2.40 |
| Liu Chang | L | 14.8.2026 | 71,300 | +221 | $2.40 |
| Liu Chang | Open Market Purchase | 13.8.2026 | 853 | +853 | $2.41 |
| Liu Chang | Open Market Purchase | 13.8.2026 | 71,079 | +853 | $2.41 |
| Liu Chang | L | 12.8.2026 | 1,135 | +1,135 | $2.47 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,444 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,159 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
17.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology