Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$152.28
▼ $1.35 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:12 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$12.95B
Day Range
$151.15 - $153.13
52-Week Range
$125.00 - $183.11
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
Support
$134.63
Resistance
$170.87
ALLE is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-14.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.43 (3y annualized return 12.9% / max drawdown 30.1%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
80/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
+2.0%
Median 40D Outcome
69/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+3.1% … +10.6%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.6% … -0.4%
🔴 Bearish
33%
-5.5% … -4.1%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 60 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +2.2%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
5 occurrence(s) · 20% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.0% | -2.0% … +4.0% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 40% (20%–64%) | -0.1% | -2.2% … +4.0% | +0.4% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.2% | -4.0% … +7.8% | +0.5% |
| 40D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.0% | -4.9% … +10.3% | +1.0% |
| 60D | 67% (42%–85%) | +9.1% | -1.6% … +17.6% | +1.0% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-22 | 80/100 | Consolidation | -4.1% | +16.6% |
| 2018-07-06 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +6.3% | +18.6% |
| 2023-08-24 | 79/100 | Downtrend | -4.2% | -1.9% |
| 2020-12-16 | 79/100 | Uptrend | +2.9% | +9.1% |
| 2021-12-22 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -3.9% | -7.1% |
| 2023-05-30 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +10.3% | +1.2% |
| 2023-09-19 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -0.2% | +5.1% |
| 2024-12-27 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -0.7% | -1.3% |
| 2022-01-31 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -6.6% | -5.5% |
| 2025-06-18 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +11.7% | +28.8% |
| 2024-07-09 | 77/100 | Downtrend | +11.3% | +27.2% |
| 2023-03-28 | 77/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +3.1% | +10.8% |
| 2024-06-17 | 76/100 | Consolidation | +9.2% | +19.7% |
| 2025-02-27 | 75/100 | Downtrend | +2.2% | +10.9% |
| 2026-03-31 | 75/100 | Downtrend | -5.5% | -3.8% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
25d ago · $160.87
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
25d ago · $160.13
Evidence: 5 bullish / 5 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
26d ago · $162.63
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
26d ago · $162.63
Evidence: 7 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
27d ago · $162.31
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
27d ago · $162.31
Evidence: 6 bullish / 4 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
27d ago · $162.31
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
27d ago · $162.31
Evidence: 6 bullish / 4 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
28d ago · $162.31
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
28d ago · $162.31
Evidence: 6 bullish / 4 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $165.20
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
31d ago · $165.20
Evidence: 6 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $159.83
Evidence: -3.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
32d ago · $161.01
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $161.01
Evidence: 6 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
67
$161.11
Now
59
$152.28
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
50
Risk
48
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
82
Institutional
18
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING ALLE...
Recent coverage of Allegion highlights its active investor engagement, participation in major industry conferences, and leadership changes including Tim Eckersley’s retirement and Serge Zappone’s appointment as head of Allegion International. The company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share and unveiled the Allegion Optimize mobile app, debuting with the LCN Senior Swing Auto Operator. Analysts also note Allegion’s strong business fundamentals, accretive acquisitions, and robust shareholder returns supporting its growth outlook.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Allegion. News trend score: 62. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
5
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
5
Fundamentals
82
Technical
50
Valuation
50
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests the dominant psychological state is herding, with a score of 45, as ALLE underperformed peers today (-2.8% vs -1.4%). A moderate panic‑selling score (16) is also present, reflected in negative momentum and below‑average volume, while other states show little support. The narrative gap (gap -4) indicates narrative optimism lags behind current reality, highlighting uncertainty about continued herding pressure. The key open question is whether peer performance will sustain herding or if reality will shift sentiment.
Updated: 09/10/2026, 12:02 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"declared a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per ordinary share"
"Schlage® XE360™ Series with RealSync™ Persistent Wi-Fi Technology"
"Allegion Optimize™ mobile application... streamline management of select Allegion products"
"analysts are cautiously optimistic about the stock’s prospects"
📈 19D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Charles Mackay’s documented emphasis on avoiding crowd mania, the model estimates ALLE is favorable (score 96) because the verdict notes “No obvious signs of crowd mania.” In contrast, Philip Fisher’s focus on exceptional growth quality yields a lower score of 55 and a verdict that the stock is “Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for,” illustrating a divergent view. Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria and Peter Lynch’s growth‑at‑a‑reasonable‑price approach both produce low scores (27 and 28 respectively) and negative verdicts, showing convergence that ALLE fails these strict safety and growth thresholds. Meanwhile, Howard Marks’ cycle‑timing perspective sits in the middle with a score of 78, suggesting an early‑to‑mid cycle stance that is not overextended, highlighting how different historical methodologies weight market timing versus fundamentals differently.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 90
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 88
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 62
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 60
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 55
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 50
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 41
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 28
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 27
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 17
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
45.2%
Operating Margin
21.1%
Net Margin
15.8%
EBITDA Margin
24.3%
ROE
31.1%
ROA
12.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.48
Cash
$356.20M
Total Debt
$1.98B
Current Ratio
1.84
Debt/Equity
0.96
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.550 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.550 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.550 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.550 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.510 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.510 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.510 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.510 |
| 17.12.2024 | $0.480 |
| 16.12.2024 | $0.480 |
| 20.9.2024 | $0.480 |
| 19.9.2024 | $0.480 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$23.88
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$7.75
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 10 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Business Wire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Business Wire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Business Wire · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
PR Newswire · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 31.8.2026
Allegion (ALLE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ALLE currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ALLE's technical score is 50/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 31.1% — strong; Current ratio: 1.84.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.43 (3y annualized return 12.9% / max drawdown 30.1%); Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — ALLE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 9 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIZELL STEVEN | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 170 | +170 | $158.28 |
| MIZELL STEVEN | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 5,899 | +170 | $158.28 |
| Eckersley Timothy P | Gift | 19.8.2026 | 1,527 | +1,527 | — |
| Eckersley Timothy P | Gift | 19.8.2026 | 1,527 | -1,527 | — |
| Ilardi David S. | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 549 | -549 | $161.09 |
| Ilardi David S. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.8.2026 | 549 | -549 | — |
| Ilardi David S. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.8.2026 | 549 | +549 | $71.84 |
| Wenos Vincent | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $168.25 |
| Wenos Vincent | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 12,096 | -1,000 | $168.25 |
| Stone John H | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 11,292 | -11,292 | $156.73 |
| Stone John H | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 136,161 | -11,292 | $156.73 |
| Eckersley Timothy P | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 6,417 | -6,417 | $157.26 |
| Eckersley Timothy P | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 29,919 | -6,417 | $157.26 |
| Musial Nickolas A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 687 | -687 | — |
| Wagnes Michael J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 1,468 | +1,468 | $86.93 |
| Musial Nickolas A. | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 687 | -687 | $155.00 |
| Musial Nickolas A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 687 | +687 | $71.84 |
| Wagnes Michael J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 1,716 | -1,716 | — |
| Wagnes Michael J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 1,716 | +1,716 | $71.84 |
| Wagnes Michael J. | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 1,716 | -1,716 | $150.98 |
| Wagnes Michael J. | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 1,468 | -1,468 | $150.98 |
| Wagnes Michael J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 1,468 | -1,468 | — |
| Musial Nickolas A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 7,485 | +687 | $71.84 |
| Musial Nickolas A. | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 6,798 | -687 | $155.00 |
| Musial Nickolas A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 0 | -687 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,955,737 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,781,568 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology