Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$295.98
▲ $6.05 (+2.1%)
Market data updated: 09/18 03:29 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$57.96B
Day Range
$290.10 - $312.42
52-Week Range
$102.14 - $440.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
COHR is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+186.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 22.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$113.45 vs. price $295.98 (-138.3%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
77/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
+5.3%
Median 40D Outcome
0/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+6.6% … +26.8%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
47%
-19.1% … -7.0%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.6%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
5 occurrence(s) · 20% historical success
Echo #2 — Trend Acceleration
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.1% | -3.3% … +7.0% | +0.9% |
| 10D | 73% (48%–89%) | +2.8% | -0.8% … +4.8% | +1.5% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.6% | -9.5% … +19.9% | +2.5% |
| 40D | 67% (42%–85%) | +5.3% | -9.5% … +21.8% | +3.3% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +5.5% | -9.7% … +23.3% | +4.4% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-25 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +26.1% | +21.8% |
| 2019-06-26 | 76/100 | Downtrend | +15.5% | +11.5% |
| 2019-11-11 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -16.5% | -0.5% |
| 2020-04-21 | 75/100 | High Volatility | +59.6% | +55.0% |
| 2021-06-23 | 74/100 | Consolidation | +1.6% | -13.7% |
| 2022-05-13 | 74/100 | Consolidation | -11.2% | -18.4% |
| 2022-08-08 | 73/100 | Consolidation | -21.7% | -35.3% |
| 2021-06-03 | 72/100 | Consolidation | +7.6% | -5.7% |
| 2022-02-11 | 72/100 | Consolidation | -6.1% | -5.5% |
| 2022-06-06 | 72/100 | High Volatility | -26.6% | -26.4% |
| 2022-11-18 | 72/100 | ✓ High Volatility | -7.8% | +24.9% |
| 2021-12-23 | 72/100 | Uptrend | -6.2% | +5.5% |
| 2023-10-13 | 71/100 | Downtrend | +3.8% | +27.7% |
| 2024-05-14 | 71/100 | Consolidation | +24.3% | +11.8% |
| 2026-01-26 | 70/100 | High Volatility | +28.9% | +77.2% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 23, 2026
Then
49
$289.52
Now
63
$295.98
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
67
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
58
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING COHR...
Recent media coverage of Coherent Corp. has focused on its stock performance amid broader market trends, particularly its 7% gain on a single day tied to sector-wide movements in optics and telecommunications stocks. The company was highlighted alongside peers like Lumentum and GoPro in discussions about optical and fiber-optic advancements, though no major company-specific developments were reported beyond insider trading activity and general market comparisons. No substantial news beyond stock movements or insider sales was explicitly detailed.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Coherent Corp.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 15 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
37
Fundamentals
58
Technical
67
Valuation
33
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-24%
Market Narrative
72
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+30
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant **Loss Aversion** (82) reflects a reluctance to crystallize losses after a steep 3-month drop, despite muted volume. The narrative gap (20) hints at a disconnect between positive news sentiment and weak technicals, suggesting investors may be holding for recovery rather than chasing gains. The absence of panic or herding implies cautious positioning, not panic-driven selling. The key question: Will the recent outperformance (+10.5%) sustain, or will further losses trigger deeper loss-avoidance behavior?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:54 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Coherent Climbs 7%"
"shares trading at roughly half of [DCF] model’s value"
"AI Demand Shapes Analyst Views"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 28/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for COHR reflects a clash between growth-focused and value-driven methodologies. Peter Lynch’s near-perfect score highlights his enthusiasm for a stock whose price hasn’t yet reflected its growth potential, while Benjamin Graham and his enterprising variant dismiss it outright, citing a lack of statistical cheapness or defensive strength. Meanwhile, cyclical and liquidity-focused investors like Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Walter Bagehot see favorable conditions—oversold positioning and resilience in credit stress—but contrast sharply with Jesse Livermore’s outright rejection, who views the stock’s trend as hostile. Even among growth-leaning investors like Howard Marks, the verdicts split between optimism (early-cycle potential) and caution (already high expectations), underscoring how COHR’s volatility and speculative appeal either excite or repel depending on the framework.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 95
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 77
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 60
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 58
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 58
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 52
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 39
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 34
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 33
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 28
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 2 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
37.5%
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
11.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
7.4%
ROA
4.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.34
Cash
$1.16B
Total Debt
$3.22B
Current Ratio
2.43
Debt/Equity
0.30
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$295.98
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$113.45
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-138.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
12.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.4% | $-1.15B | $-1.06B |
| 2 | 9.9% | $-1.26B | $-1.06B |
| 3 | 7.4% | $-1.36B | $-1.05B |
| 4 | 5.0% | $-1.43B | $-1.01B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-1.46B | $-949.88M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-1.02B
Terminal Value
$-23.05B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-14.98B
Enterprise Value
$-20.11B
Net Debt
$2.06B
Equity Value
$-22.17B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$55.80
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$18.65
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 15 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Coherent Corp. (COHR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
COHR currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, COHR's estimated fair value is -$113.45, which is 138.3% below the current price of $295.98. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
COHR's technical score is 67/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 22.5%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 892.3%; Net income growth: 1530.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$113.45 vs. price $295.98 (-138.3%); ATR: 7.8% of price; Free cash flow growth: -630.9%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for COHR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 9 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beard Robert P | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 500 | -500 | $309.32 |
| Neal-Graves Lisa | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 2,200 | -2,200 | $268.42 |
| Eng Julie Sheridan | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 6,030 | -6,030 | $270.69 |
| SKAGGS STEPHEN A | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 2,272 | -2,272 | $276.88 |
| Digirolomo Enrico | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 2,272 | -2,272 | $276.85 |
| Eng Julie Sheridan | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 7,047 | -7,047 | $276.83 |
| Place Jeffrey B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 3,358 | +3,358 | — |
| Mocciaro Ilaria | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.8.2026 | 2,174 | -2,174 | $295.39 |
| Luther Sherri R | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 8,731 | +8,731 | — |
| Beard Robert P | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.8.2026 | 1,896 | -1,896 | $295.39 |
| ANDERSON JAMES ROBERT | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.8.2026 | 11,958 | -11,958 | $295.39 |
| Eng Julie Sheridan | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 11,960 | +11,960 | — |
| ANDERSON JAMES ROBERT | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 30,564 | +30,564 | — |
| Mocciaro Ilaria | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 1,612 | +1,612 | — |
| Beard Robert P | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 5,373 | +5,373 | — |
| Mocciaro Ilaria | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 2,449 | +2,449 | — |
| Mocciaro Ilaria | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 2,335 | +2,335 | — |
| Eng Julie Sheridan | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 5,373 | +5,373 | — |
| Eng Julie Sheridan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.8.2026 | 12,862 | -12,862 | $295.39 |
| Luther Sherri R | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.8.2026 | 2,594 | -2,594 | $295.39 |
| Luther Sherri R | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $324.00 |
| Luther Sherri R | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $306.68 |
| Luther Sherri R | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 67,475 | -1,000 | $306.68 |
| Place Jeffrey B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 2,181 | -2,181 | $394.47 |
| Place Jeffrey B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 17,658 | -2,181 | $394.47 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
10,764,076 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 9,047,021 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
48.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology