Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$14.71
▲ $0.04 (+0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:30 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$1.27B
Day Range
$14.52 - $14.93
52-Week Range
$7.80 - $14.93
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$10.55
Resistance
$14.93
TK is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+69.7% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 9/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
RSI
RSI 71.0 — approaching overbought territory
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
TK exhibits a balanced yet nuanced profile, with its **investorScore of 79** and **STRONG rating** driven primarily by robust technical indicators and moderate news sentiment. The **technical category (89)** stands out due to clear bullish momentum—price above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 68.0, all signaling strong upward momentum. However, the **%K at 86.6** suggests overbought conditions, which could indicate potential short-term consolidation. The **news category (68)** reflects mixed but slightly positive sentiment, with neutral earnings call coverage and a single positive value-investing perspective, though a cautionary energy-sector headline introduces uncertainty. The **risk category (50)** highlights moderate volatility, with an ATR of 3.5% and a Sharpe ratio of 0.74, indicating a historical return of 30.5% over three years but with a peak drawdown of 41%. Together, these factors create a picture of a stock with strong technical support but tempered by overbought signals and sector-specific risks.
The stock price is firmly above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, accompanied by a positive MACD histogram and an RSI of 68.0, all pointing to strong upward momentum. However, the %K indicator at 86.6 suggests the stock is currently overbought.
Technical strength signals potential for continued price appreciation, but overbought conditions may signal near-term pullback risks.
News sentiment is mixed, with neutral coverage of earnings calls and a single positive value-investment perspective, though a cautionary energy-sector headline introduces uncertainty. No major negative or bullish catalysts dominate the narrative.
Neutral news sentiment suggests limited near-term catalysts, while sector-specific concerns could impact investor perception.
The stock exhibits moderate volatility with an ATR of 3.5% and a Sharpe ratio of 0.74, reflecting a historical return of 30.5% over three years but with a peak drawdown of 41%.
While the long-term return is strong, the high drawdown risk underscores the need for caution in volatile market conditions.
StockIQ conclusion
TK demonstrates a compelling technical profile with clear bullish signals, supported by recent outperformance and neutral earnings coverage. However, overbought conditions and sector-specific risks temper the outlook, while moderate volatility underscores the need for cautious positioning. The stock’s strength lies in its momentum, but investors should monitor overbought signals and energy sector developments closely to assess sustainability.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/11/202675
This Week
75
7D Ago
→ 0
Stable
Technical
82
7D Ago: 83
→ -1
News
68
7D Ago: 68
→ 0
Risk
50
7D Ago: 50
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
75
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $14.67
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $14.67
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $14.86
Evidence: +3.5pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $14.39
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $14.39
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $14.39
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $14.53
Evidence: +3.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $14.19
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $14.19
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
15d ago · $13.47
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
15d ago · $13.47
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
75 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 27, 2026
Then
76
$12.25
Now
75
$14.71
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
82
Risk
50
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Teekay Corporation Ltd. has centered on its **strong Q2 2026 financial performance**, highlighting a **record net income** and **robust cash flow** amid market scrutiny. Analysts noted a **tripling of earnings per share (EPS)**, sparking discussions about its valuation and potential as a value investment. Some warnings about overbought stocks in the energy sector briefly included Teekay, but overall, the focus remained on its **positive earnings results** and operational strength.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Teekay Corporation Ltd.. News trend score: 68. Reason: 4 of the last 16 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
49
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
70
Fundamentals
—
Technical
82
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+24%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+17
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **balanced mix of cautious excitement (FOMO) and anchored positioning near resistance**, with no dominant panic or herd-driven bias. The narrative gap (3 points) implies minor misalignment, but euphoria remains muted despite positive momentum. Key open question: Will traders break resistance or anchor tighter, or will sentiment shift if momentum stalls? The absence of extreme volatility or divergence from peers keeps the market cautious but not panicked.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:51 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"EPS from continuing operations more than tripled"
"Record Net Income and Strong Cash Flow"
"Teekay (TK) Is Down 5.1% After EPS From Continuing Operations More Than Triples"
"Teekay Q2 Earnings, Revenue Rise"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 75/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 2/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among the methodologies, with scores ranging from a cautious 71 under Edgar Lawrence Smith—who, despite limited dividend/growth data, suggests *some* potential—to a resounding 7 from Samuel Armstrong Nelson, who sees it as dangerously overbought at this cycle stage. Meanwhile, the middle-ground thinkers like Howard Marks and Jesse Livermore (both scoring 53–63) acknowledge the stock’s merits but flag overvaluation or lack of clear momentum, while Philip Fisher, Benjamin Graham, and Peter Lynch all hit 50 due to insufficient fundamental data. On the extreme ends, Thorstein Veblen (20) and Morgan Housel (18) dismiss it outright, with Veblen seeing it as growth-chasing and Housel warning of volatility that could spook patient investors. The contrast highlights whether the stock’s speculative appeal (or perceived fundamentals) outweighs its cyclical or psychological risks.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 75
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 48
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 45
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 39
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 27
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 2
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 26.5.2026 | $1.000 |
| 25.5.2026 | $1.000 |
| 2.7.2025 | $1.000 |
| 1.7.2025 | $1.000 |
| 4.12.2024 | $1.000 |
| 3.12.2024 | $1.000 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 16 articles.
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 6.8.2026
Zacks · 4.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 1.8.2026
MarketBeat · 1.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
Moby · 30.7.2026
MT Newswires · 30.7.2026
Associated Press · 29.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 15.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Teekay Corporation Ltd. (TK) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for TK specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
TK's technical score is 82/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: RSI 71.0 — approaching overbought territory; %K 89.4 — overbought.
Yes — TK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 11 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hvid Kenneth | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.9.2026 | 132,884 | +132,884 | $5.81 |
| Hvid Kenneth | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 132,884 | -132,884 | $14.28 |
| Hvid Kenneth | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.9.2026 | 132,884 | -132,884 | $5.81 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.9.2026 | 11,585 | -11,585 | $5.81 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.9.2026 | 11,585 | +11,585 | $5.81 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 11,585 | -11,585 | $14.08 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $13.64 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 485 | -485 | $13.24 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 96 | -96 | $13.19 |
| Speers Brody | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 350 | -350 | $13.20 |
| Speers Brody | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $13.08 |
| Krediet Rudolph | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 41,457 | -41,457 | $11.45 |
| Krediet Rudolph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 41,457 | +41,457 | $3.98 |
| Krediet Rudolph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 41,457 | -41,457 | $3.98 |
| Krediet Rudolph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 76,624 | +41,457 | $3.98 |
| Krediet Rudolph | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 35,167 | -41,457 | $11.45 |
| Krediet Rudolph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 0 | -41,457 | $3.98 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 18,119 | -18,119 | $12.37 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 18,119 | +18,119 | $3.98 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 18,119 | -18,119 | $3.98 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 65,701 | +18,119 | $3.98 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 47,582 | -18,119 | $12.37 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 0 | -18,119 | $3.98 |
| Krediet Rudolph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.6.2026 | 41,457 | -41,457 | $3.98 |
| Krediet Rudolph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.6.2026 | 21,585 | -21,585 | $5.81 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,225,552 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,334,642 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 60.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology