Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$248.92
▼ $3.75 (-1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:23 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$98.95B
Day Range
$247.21 - $252.67
52-Week Range
$190.12 - $368.73
Beta
—
Next Earnings
08.12.2026
Support
$210.88
Resistance
$294.53
ADBE is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-32.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $433.54 vs. price $248.92 (+74.2%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
77/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
-1.0%
Median 40D Outcome
35/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
33%
+10.1% … +14.5%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.6% … -0.6%
🔴 Bearish
60%
-11.3% … -3.7%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 33% (95% CI 15%–58%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -2.4%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
8 occurrence(s) · 38% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.5% | -2.5% … +4.8% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.1% | -10.7% … +4.9% | +1.0% |
| 20D | 33% (15%–58%) | -2.4% | -8.1% … +6.1% | +1.3% |
| 40D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.0% | -6.0% … +5.9% | +1.9% |
| 60D | 33% (15%–58%) | -5.4% | -11.6% … +7.4% | +2.8% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-24 | 77/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -11.3% | -4.2% |
| 2023-03-02 | 76/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +14.5% | +24.6% |
| 2025-06-26 | 73/100 | Consolidation | -3.7% | -5.4% |
| 2022-02-28 | 72/100 | Downtrend | -3.8% | -14.8% |
| 2023-05-11 | 71/100 | Downtrend | +32.9% | +52.4% |
| 2024-12-24 | 70/100 | Downtrend | -2.1% | -9.9% |
| 2026-01-26 | 70/100 | Downtrend | -16.3% | -16.0% |
| 2024-09-26 | 69/100 | Downtrend | -6.3% | -13.2% |
| 2026-05-22 | 69/100 | Consolidation | -19.3% | +11.3% |
| 2025-04-14 | 67/100 | Downtrend | +13.2% | +3.5% |
| 2026-02-17 | 67/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -2.4% | -9.4% |
| 2026-04-14 | 66/100 | Downtrend | +2.2% | -5.1% |
| 2025-01-15 | 65/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +10.1% | -15.5% |
| 2025-10-17 | 65/100 | Downtrend | -0.6% | -8.6% |
| 2026-06-08 | 65/100 | Consolidation | -9.8% | +14.2% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
72
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🔎 What Changed (vs. 30 days ago)
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
14d ago · $266.51
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -24 to 2 day-over-day
What happened after
16d ago · $285.75
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 13 to -14 day-over-day
What happened after
25d ago · $272.35
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
25d ago · $272.35
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
26d ago · $276.27
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
26d ago · $276.27
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
27d ago · $275.30
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
27d ago · $275.30
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
28d ago · $275.30
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
28d ago · $275.30
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
28d ago · $275.30
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
28d ago · $275.30
Evidence: 9 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $274.15
Evidence: +5.6pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
31d ago · $270.59
Evidence: +4.4pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
31d ago · $270.59
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
31d ago · $270.59
Evidence: 7 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $266.74
Evidence: +6.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
32d ago · $266.74
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $266.74
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
72
$265.58
Now
60
$248.92
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
58
Value
67
Momentum
26
Risk
26
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
70
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING ADBE...
Recent media coverage of Adobe Inc. has centered on leadership changes and investor speculation. The company announced Anil Chakravarthy’s appointment as CEO, succeeding Shantanu Narayen, who will become executive chair, marking the first CEO transition in nearly two decades. Analysts, including Morgan Stanley, have drawn comparisons between Adobe and Oracle, while stock analysts like Mizuho adjusted price targets to $260. Investor attention also highlights Adobe’s stock rally, with discussions about potential growth to $300, driven by its AI initiatives and strong market position.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Adobe Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 18 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
64
Fundamentals
70
Technical
26
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+28%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
-1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ADBE’s psychology is fragmented, with **Panic Selling** and **FOMO** competing as top signals. The negative momentum (-5.5% ROC) and neutral RSI (42) suggest cautious selling, while modest volume (1.01x avg) and positive sentiment (68) hint at lingering FOMO. The narrative gap (-9) implies reality (undervaluation vs. DCF) clashes with market perception. The key question: Is the selling technical (momentum drag) or fundamental (valuation reassessment)?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 06:27 PM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Longtime CEO Shantanu Narayen will transition to executive chair. Anil Chakravarthy will become president and CEO, effective Dec. 1."
"A deeper AI disruption debate that has kept the fund negative all year."
"Is Adobe's Stock Heading for $300? — The tech stock has been quietly rallying for the past few months."
"Had a very difficult H1, have eked out a profit but not by much and nowhere near enough to justify time/effort/risk."
📈 22D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of the various investors, the model estimates that the more cycle‑ and growth‑oriented frameworks (Nelson, Lynch, Mackay, Fisher, Veblen, and Marks’s cycle view) assign high scores (90‑71) because they see ADBE as oversold, still growing, and of high quality. Investors who stress valuation safety and capital preservation (Graham, Graham‑enterprising, Loeb, Bagehot) give much lower scores (53 down to 14), reflecting concerns that the price is not sufficiently cheap and that liquidity or risk could threaten capital. The moderate‑score group (Marks, Smith, Housel, efficient‑market) yields mixed verdicts, balancing a good business against high expectations or weak evidence of outperformance relative to an index. Consequently, the divergence stems from each methodology’s weighting of cycle position, growth potential, margin of safety, and market efficiency, leading to a spectrum of enthusiasm versus caution for ADBE.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 90
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 86
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 75
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 71
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 54
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 53
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 52
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 39
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 34
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 27
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 17
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 14
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
89.3%
Operating Margin
36.6%
Net Margin
30.0%
EBITDA Margin
40.1%
ROE
61.3%
ROA
24.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$16.73
Cash
$5.43B
Total Debt
$6.21B
Current Ratio
1.00
Debt/Equity
0.53
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$248.92
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$433.54
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+74.2%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.5% | $10.89B | $9.99B |
| 2 | 8.5% | $11.82B | $9.95B |
| 3 | 6.5% | $12.59B | $9.72B |
| 4 | 4.5% | $13.15B | $9.32B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $13.48B | $8.76B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$9.85B
Terminal Value
$212.59B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$138.17B
Enterprise Value
$185.90B
Net Debt
$779.00M
Equity Value
$185.12B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$27.22
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$4.05
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 18 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Adobe Inc. (ADBE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 60/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ADBE currently scores 60/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ADBE's estimated fair value is $433.54, which is 74.2% above the current price of $248.92. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ADBE's technical score is 26/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $433.54 vs. price $248.92 (+74.2%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 35.1%; Free cash flow growth: 25.1%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.1% of price; Current ratio: 1.00; Calmar: -0.33 (3y annualized return -22.8% / max drawdown 69.5%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ADBE.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day Steven | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 58 | -58 | — |
| Day Steven | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 28 | -28 | $264.02 |
| Day Steven | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 58 | +58 | — |
| Forusz Jillian | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 416 | -416 | $264.33 |
| Forusz Jillian | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 3,824 | -416 | $264.33 |
| Day Steven | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 22,616 | +22,616 | — |
| Day Steven | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 419 | -419 | — |
| Day Steven | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 153 | -153 | — |
| Day Steven | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 63 | -63 | — |
| Day Steven | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 55 | -55 | — |
| Day Steven | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.7.2026 | 207 | -207 | $224.56 |
| Day Steven | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 419 | +419 | — |
| Day Steven | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 153 | +153 | — |
| Day Steven | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.7.2026 | 75 | -75 | $224.56 |
| Day Steven | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.7.2026 | 31 | -31 | $224.56 |
| Day Steven | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 55 | +55 | — |
| Chakravarthy Anil | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 696 | -696 | — |
| Chakravarthy Anil | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 437 | -437 | — |
| Chakravarthy Anil | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 1,130 | -1,130 | — |
| Day Steven | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.7.2026 | 27 | -27 | $224.56 |
| Day Steven | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 63 | +63 | — |
| Chakravarthy Anil | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 761 | -761 | — |
| Chakravarthy Anil | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.7.2026 | 560 | -560 | $224.56 |
| Chakravarthy Anil | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 1,130 | +1,130 | — |
| Forusz Jillian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 22 | -22 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
17,369,986 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 19,347,621 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology