Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$118.40
▲ $0.47 (+0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/19 04:38 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$40.85B
Day Range
$116.27 - $118.60
52-Week Range
$91.89 - $127.72
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$113.64
Resistance
$127.72
PRU is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
+14.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/25 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 33.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.21 (3y annualized return 6.2% / max drawdown 29.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
88/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
93/100
Analog Quality
-6.1%
Median 40D Outcome
64/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
33%
+4.4% … +6.0%
🟡 Base
20%
-0.9% … -0.8%
🔴 Bearish
47%
-10.7% … -6.4%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 40 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 33% (95% CI 15%–58%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -1.0%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
8 occurrence(s) · 25% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 27% (11%–52%) | -1.1% | -5.6% … +1.1% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.6% | -4.0% … +2.3% | +0.6% |
| 20D | 33% (15%–58%) | -1.0% | -7.4% … +3.7% | +1.1% |
| 40D | 33% (15%–58%) | -6.1% | -11.3% … +3.2% | +1.7% |
| 60D | 33% (15%–58%) | -10.5% | -13.7% … +3.0% | +1.8% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-25 | 88/100 | Consolidation | +4.4% | -9.4% |
| 2024-04-30 | 88/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +6.3% | +12.4% |
| 2021-11-24 | 84/100 | Consolidation | -1.0% | +3.1% |
| 2024-09-25 | 84/100 | Consolidation | +4.7% | -3.4% |
| 2021-09-16 | 84/100 | Consolidation | +6.0% | +3.3% |
| 2025-01-14 | 83/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -5.8% | -16.3% |
| 2019-07-17 | 83/100 | Consolidation | -19.7% | -12.4% |
| 2019-05-17 | 83/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -0.9% | -15.4% |
| 2024-06-05 | 83/100 | Uptrend | -0.8% | +2.9% |
| 2026-02-02 | 83/100 | Consolidation | -11.6% | -13.7% |
| 2021-07-12 | 82/100 | Consolidation | +3.1% | +6.4% |
| 2025-02-03 | 82/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -7.8% | -13.6% |
| 2026-01-13 | 81/100 | Uptrend | -9.7% | -16.9% |
| 2024-12-09 | 81/100 | Consolidation | -3.4% | -13.2% |
| 2024-11-20 | 80/100 | Consolidation | -7.0% | -10.5% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLF (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
45
Risk
42
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
50
Institutional
50
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING PRU...
Everyone's writing about Prudential Financial. News trend score: 86. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
29
Fundamentals
50
Technical
45
Valuation
55
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+11%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+22
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 79/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 3/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, the model estimates that Benjamin Graham views PRU as attractive to a defensive investor because of its solid fundamentals and low risk profile, while Peter Lynch sees it as a growth candidate whose price has not yet caught up to earnings potential. Thorstein Veblen’s higher score reflects a belief that growth aligns with real value creation, whereas Walter Bagehot’s lower score indicates insufficient balance‑sheet data to apply his strict liquidity criteria. Mid‑range scores from investors like Morgan Housel, Charles Mackay and Edgar Lawrence Smith suggest moderate confidence, crowd excitement and reasonable but not compelling long‑term holding case, while lower scores from Howard Marks (both standard and cycle) and Philip Fisher highlight concerns about high expectations and a lack of the quality‑growth signature Fisher requires. Overall, the divergent conclusions arise from each methodology’s focus on different metrics—defensive safety, growth momentum, balance‑sheet strength, market‑cycle positioning and qualitative quality signals—leading to a spread of verdicts from favorable to cautious.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 79
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 78
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 74
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 70
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 61
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 57
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 53
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 52
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 49
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 3
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$113.64
Range Bottom
$127.72
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
7.8%
Net Margin
6.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
11.0%
ROA
0.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$10.05
Cash
$19.71B
Total Debt
$20.30B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.71
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 25.8.2026 | $1.400 |
| 26.5.2026 | $1.400 |
| 25.5.2026 | $1.400 |
| 17.2.2026 | $1.400 |
| 16.2.2026 | $1.400 |
| 18.11.2025 | $1.350 |
| 17.11.2025 | $1.350 |
| 19.8.2025 | $1.350 |
| 18.8.2025 | $1.350 |
| 20.5.2025 | $1.350 |
| 19.5.2025 | $1.350 |
| 18.2.2025 | $1.350 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$93.24
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$77.46
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Barchart · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Business Wire · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.9.2026
Prudential Financial (PRU) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
PRU currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
PRU's technical score is 45/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 33.2%; Net income growth: 31.1%; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.21 (3y annualized return 6.2% / max drawdown 29.0%); Revenue growth (last year): -13.7%; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — PRU has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boyle Robert E | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 115 | -115 | $117.60 |
| Boyle Robert E | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 353 | +353 | — |
| Boyle Robert E | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 353 | -353 | — |
| KAPPLER ANN M | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 7,652 | -7,652 | $125.01 |
| PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO OF AMERICA | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 214,746.359 | -214,746.359 | $24.75 |
| PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC | Open Market Purchase | 15.7.2026 | 3,000,000 | +3,000,000 | $10.00 |
| PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC | Open Market Purchase | 15.7.2026 | 3,000,000 | +3,000,000 | $10.00 |
| CASELLAS GILBERT F | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 23 | +23 | $106.51 |
| Di Sibio Carmine | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 23 | +23 | $106.51 |
| HUNDMEJEAN MARTINA | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 369 | +369 | $106.51 |
| CASELLAS GILBERT F | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 563 | +563 | $106.51 |
| Jones Wendy Elizabeth | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 23 | +23 | $106.51 |
| HUNDMEJEAN MARTINA | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 23 | +23 | $106.51 |
| Di Sibio Carmine | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 41 | +41 | $106.51 |
| HUNDMEJEAN MARTINA | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 197 | +197 | $106.51 |
| Jones Wendy Elizabeth | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 126 | +126 | $106.51 |
| Jones Wendy Elizabeth | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 23 | +23 | $106.51 |
| Mannen Maryann T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 23 | +23 | $106.51 |
| TODMAN MICHAEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 23 | +23 | $106.51 |
| Pianalto Sandra | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 92 | +92 | $106.51 |
| Pianalto Sandra | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 23 | +23 | $106.51 |
| POON CHRISTINE A | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 54 | +54 | $106.51 |
| Stoddard Thomas D | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 23 | +23 | $106.51 |
| TODMAN MICHAEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 170 | +170 | $106.51 |
| POON CHRISTINE A | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 23 | +23 | $106.51 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
13,546,466 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 12,096,608 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
77.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 75.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology