Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$249.83
▼ $2.38 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:51 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$63.17B
Day Range
$247.78 - $251.41
52-Week Range
$188.08 - $277.22
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$236.22
Resistance
$277.22
ALL is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
+21.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $659.27 vs. price $249.83 (+163.9%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
82/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
+5.3%
Median 40D Outcome
63/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
73%
+4.9% … +11.0%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.8% … -0.8%
🔴 Bearish
20%
-8.0% … -2.4%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 73% (95% CI 48%–89%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +5.3%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
2 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Echo #2 — Trend Acceleration
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Echo #3 — Oversold Reversal
1 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 60% (36%–80%) | +2.1% | -0.4% … +4.3% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.2% | -0.6% … +6.6% | +0.7% |
| 20D | 73% (48%–89%) | +5.3% | +1.2% … +8.7% | +1.2% |
| 40D | 80% (55%–93%) | +5.3% | +2.9% … +8.4% | +2.4% |
| 60D | 60% (36%–80%) | +5.3% | +0.5% … +13.0% | +3.3% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-19 | 82/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -2.4% | +10.7% |
| 2024-06-04 | 82/100 | Consolidation | -2.4% | +15.3% |
| 2025-01-07 | 81/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +3.1% | +0.3% |
| 2024-06-18 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +10.4% | +17.6% |
| 2021-07-22 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +4.5% | -1.2% |
| 2024-11-04 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +11.5% | +5.3% |
| 2026-06-03 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +19.6% | +24.5% |
| 2025-02-12 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +6.7% | +7.0% |
| 2022-12-14 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +7.0% | -12.0% |
| 2025-07-28 | 78/100 | Downtrend | +5.3% | +0.9% |
| 2023-03-03 | 77/100 | Consolidation | -13.5% | -13.6% |
| 2025-07-11 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +7.0% | +8.0% |
| 2024-07-05 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +11.6% | +19.7% |
| 2025-06-18 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -0.8% | +0.6% |
| 2025-09-15 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +4.4% | +2.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLF (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
16d ago · $263.11
Evidence: 8 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
25d ago · $257.61
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
25d ago · $257.49
Evidence: 2 bullish / 7 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
25d ago · $260.19
Evidence: 3 bullish / 5 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
26d ago · $260.19
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
26d ago · $259.09
Evidence: 3 bullish / 5 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
27d ago · $253.83
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
27d ago · $253.83
Evidence: 2 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
28d ago · $253.83
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
28d ago · $253.83
Evidence: 2 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
28d ago · $253.83
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
28d ago · $253.83
Evidence: 2 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $260.58
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
31d ago · $260.58
Evidence: 4 bullish / 4 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $263.17
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $263.17
Evidence: 5 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
67
$262.83
Now
61
$249.83
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
73
Quality
55
Value
67
Momentum
33
Risk
64
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
67
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING ALL...
Recent coverage of Allstate (ALL) highlights its high return on equity and cash‑generating profile, positioning it among top high‑ROE stocks amid rate‑hike
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Allstate. News trend score: 92. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
41
Fundamentals
67
Technical
33
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+13%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+5
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior suggests investors are aligning with peers after a relative underperformance, despite the stock’s positive momentum and sentiment. The anchoring effect near support (3.2%) may reinforce reluctance to sell, while euphoria is muted by the significant valuation gap (-61%). The narrative gap (9 points) hints at a disconnect between investor optimism and fundamental realities. The key question remains whether herding will persist or if anchoring breaks under further peer outperformance.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 07:47 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Allstate are using AI, data and technology to improve insurance efficiency, underwriting and growth"
"Allstate (ALL) Down 4.4% Since Last Earnings Report: Can It Rebound?"
"The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights Travelers, Kinsale Capital and Allstate"
📈 21D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 38/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Walter Bagehot's documented principles, the model cannot generate a reliable estimate because there is insufficient balance‑sheet data. Samuel Armstrong Nelson's cycle‑based approach gives a relatively high score, suggesting the stock is near an oversold position and thus favorable. In contrast, Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria and Peter Lynch’s growth focus both yield high scores but for different reasons—Graham sees an attractively priced defensive play, while Lynch highlights uncapped growth not yet reflected in price. Lower‑scoring investors such as Philip Fisher, Jesse Livermore, and Jack Schwager converge on skepticism because the stock lacks the quality‑growth profile Fisher requires, runs counter to Livermore’s trend‑following rule, and offers no clear setup for disciplined entry.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 97
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 86
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 86
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 82
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 76
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 73
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 70
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 69
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 56
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 43
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$236.22
Range Bottom
$277.22
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
15.2%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
33.6%
ROA
8.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$38.56
Cash
$678.00M
Total Debt
$7.49B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.24
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.8.2026 | $1.080 |
| 1.6.2026 | $1.080 |
| 31.5.2026 | $1.080 |
| 2.3.2026 | $1.080 |
| 1.3.2026 | $1.080 |
| 1.12.2025 | $1.000 |
| 30.11.2025 | $1.000 |
| 29.8.2025 | $1.000 |
| 28.8.2025 | $1.000 |
| 9.6.2025 | $1.000 |
| 8.6.2025 | $1.000 |
| 10.3.2025 | $1.000 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$249.83
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$659.27
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+163.9%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
9.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.6% | $10.83B | $9.94B |
| 2 | 7.9% | $11.69B | $9.84B |
| 3 | 6.1% | $12.39B | $9.57B |
| 4 | 4.3% | $12.93B | $9.16B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $13.25B | $8.61B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$9.88B
Terminal Value
$208.93B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$135.79B
Enterprise Value
$182.90B
Net Debt
$6.81B
Equity Value
$176.09B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$114.60
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$100.84
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 5 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockStory · 10.9.2026
Allstate (ALL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ALL currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ALL's estimated fair value is $659.27, which is 163.9% above the current price of $249.83. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ALL's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $659.27 vs. price $249.83 (+163.9%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 124.0%; Net income growth: 120.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — ALL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeevanjee Zulfikar | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.9.2026 | 213 | -213 | $259.57 |
| Jeevanjee Zulfikar | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.9.2026 | 483 | +483 | — |
| KEANE MARGARET M | Gift | 3.9.2026 | 944 | -944 | — |
| LOWN CHRISTIAN M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.9.2026 | 16,615 | +16,615 | — |
| LOWN CHRISTIAN M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.9.2026 | 3,783 | +3,783 | — |
| Rizzo Mario | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 12,827 | -12,827 | $265.55 |
| Rizzo Mario | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 56,225 | -56,225 | — |
| Rizzo Mario | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 56,225 | +56,225 | $92.46 |
| Rizzo Mario | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 43,398 | -43,398 | $264.17 |
| Rizzo Mario | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 138,452 | +56,225 | $92.46 |
| Rizzo Mario | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 82,227 | -12,827 | $265.55 |
| Rizzo Mario | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 95,054 | -43,398 | $264.17 |
| Rizzo Mario | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 0 | -56,225 | — |
| Dugenske John E | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 25,717 | -25,717 | $268.80 |
| Dugenske John E | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 3,378 | -3,378 | $270.20 |
| Dugenske John E | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 3,901 | -3,901 | $272.05 |
| Dugenske John E | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 42,672 | -3,378 | $270.20 |
| Dugenske John E | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 38,771 | -3,901 | $272.05 |
| Dugenske John E | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 13,054 | -25,717 | $268.80 |
| Perold Jacques P | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 174 | +174 | $243.12 |
| KEANE MARGARET M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 138 | +138 | $243.12 |
| TRAQUINA PERRY M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 169 | +169 | $243.12 |
| TRAQUINA PERRY M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 8,043 | +169 | $243.12 |
| KEANE MARGARET M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 18,502 | +138 | $243.12 |
| Perold Jacques P | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 2,189 | +174 | $243.12 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,318,184 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,816,754 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 40.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology