Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$218.98
▼ $7.37 (-3.3%)
Market data updated: 09/17 05:39 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$55.29B
Day Range
$216.66 - $228.18
52-Week Range
$183.00 - $339.95
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
NXPI is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+3.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $98.78 vs. price $218.98 (-54.9%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
85/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
-0.4%
Median 40D Outcome
26/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
40%
+6.7% … +13.6%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
60%
-8.8% … -5.0%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 40% (95% CI 20%–64%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -1.9%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
2 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.1% | -5.0% … +3.9% | +0.2% |
| 10D | 33% (15%–58%) | -2.1% | -6.9% … +6.0% | +0.3% |
| 20D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.9% | -7.1% … +7.1% | +1.1% |
| 40D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.4% | -6.9% … +10.0% | +2.5% |
| 60D | 47% (25%–70%) | -1.1% | -9.1% … +10.3% | +3.2% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-06 | 85/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +47.5% | +41.7% |
| 2018-09-18 | 81/100 | Downtrend | -11.4% | -14.0% |
| 2025-01-16 | 80/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +6.3% | -19.1% |
| 2024-10-23 | 80/100 | Consolidation | -6.8% | -8.6% |
| 2025-02-07 | 79/100 | Consolidation | -1.9% | -14.3% |
| 2025-12-01 | 78/100 | Downtrend | +10.3% | +13.8% |
| 2024-08-29 | 77/100 | Consolidation | -1.5% | -9.0% |
| 2018-12-06 | 77/100 | Consolidation | -7.4% | +12.0% |
| 2024-10-02 | 77/100 | Downtrend | +4.2% | -9.2% |
| 2022-04-29 | 76/100 | Downtrend | +14.6% | +6.2% |
| 2023-10-06 | 76/100 | Consolidation | -8.8% | +8.6% |
| 2023-05-08 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +7.9% | +28.5% |
| 2022-10-04 | 74/100 | Downtrend | -5.0% | -1.1% |
| 2024-12-11 | 73/100 | Downtrend | -5.9% | -7.0% |
| 2025-10-23 | 73/100 | Consolidation | -16.6% | +5.9% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $226.31
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 10 to 39 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
37
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
45
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
80
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING NXPI...
Recent coverage of NXP Semiconductors has centered on a modest share‑price decline—dropping about 1.7% to $223.87, underperforming the broader market—and the company’s presentation at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference 2026, where executives discussed its strategy and outlook. No other major events or themes were highlighted in the available English‑language sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about NXP Semiconductors. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
48
Fundamentals
80
Technical
45
Valuation
38
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-24%
Market Narrative
77
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+37
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Loss Aversion** state (55) reflects a market cautious after a steep 23% drop, where traders hesitate to lock in losses despite modest volume. **Overconfidence** (46) and **Confirmation Bias** (35) coexist, as traders cling to a narrative gap (+27) despite stagnant fundamentals, possibly masking underlying uncertainty. The **Euphoria** score (28) is misleading—valuation extremes (+127% DCF) contrast with neutral momentum, suggesting selective optimism. The key question is whether traders will double down on selective narratives or pivot as peers outperform. **Herding** remains muted, indicating no blind following despite underperformance.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:45 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"shares remained sharply lower following the results, extending a 5.6% regular-session decline as investors weighed margin and memory-supply uncertainty. The results arrived weeks after a report that NXP was in talks to"
"While NXP Semiconductors has lagged behind the S&P 500 Index over the past year"
"implied volatility surging for NXP Semiconductors stock options"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Howard Marks (Market Cycle) — 70/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 10/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Jack Schwager's disciplined setup criteria, the model estimates a strong 73 score, suggesting a favorable reward‑risk profile, while Howard Marks's market‑cycle lens gives a more moderate 62, placing the stock near the middle of the cycle. Value‑oriented frameworks such as Graham's defensive and enterprising screens score only 10 and 31, reflecting concerns about valuation and safety, whereas growth‑oriented gauges like Fisher (49) and Lynch (21) find the company lacking the required quality or price discipline. The efficient‑market view (55) and Bagehot's liquidity assessment (47) indicate a mixed or adequate case but not a compelling edge over broad indices. Overall, the spread from high‑confidence technical and cycle scores to low‑confidence value and growth scores explains why the historical methodologies diverge in their outlook for NXPI.
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 59
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 47
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 44
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 38
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 36
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 36
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 21
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 10
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (3 bullish · 4 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
54.7%
Operating Margin
24.8%
Net Margin
16.5%
EBITDA Margin
31.6%
ROE
20.1%
ROA
7.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$8.00
Cash
$3.27B
Total Debt
$12.22B
Current Ratio
2.05
Debt/Equity
1.22
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 24.6.2026 | $1.014 |
| 23.6.2026 | $1.014 |
| 25.3.2026 | $1.014 |
| 24.3.2026 | $1.014 |
| 10.12.2025 | $1.014 |
| 9.12.2025 | $1.014 |
| 17.9.2025 | $1.014 |
| 16.9.2025 | $1.014 |
| 25.6.2025 | $1.014 |
| 24.6.2025 | $1.014 |
| 19.3.2025 | $1.014 |
| 18.3.2025 | $1.014 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$218.98
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$98.78
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-54.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-2.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -2.4% | $2.36B | $2.17B |
| 2 | -1.2% | $2.34B | $1.97B |
| 3 | 0.1% | $2.34B | $1.81B |
| 4 | 1.3% | $2.37B | $1.68B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $2.43B | $1.58B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$2.42B
Terminal Value
$38.28B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$24.88B
Enterprise Value
$34.08B
Net Debt
$8.96B
Equity Value
$25.12B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$39.54
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$7.04
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 5 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Trefis · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
MarketBeat · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockStory · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Stocktwits · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NXPI currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NXPI's estimated fair value is $98.78, which is 54.9% below the current price of $218.98. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NXPI's technical score is 45/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 20.1% — strong; Current ratio: 2.05.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $98.78 vs. price $218.98 (-54.9%); Calmar: 0.09 (3y annualized return 4.3% / max drawdown 47.2%); Revenue growth (last year): -2.7%.
Yes — NXPI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hoffmann Michael Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 2,075 | +2,075 | — |
| Hoffmann Michael Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 2,075 | +2,075 | — |
| Micallef Andrew | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $315.57 |
| Micallef Andrew | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 8,942 | -1,000 | $315.57 |
| GAVRIELOV MOSHE | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 841 | +841 | — |
| Sundstrom Karl-Henrik | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 841 | +841 | — |
| Sundstrom Karl-Henrik | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 1,035 | +1,035 | — |
| Sundstrom Karl-Henrik | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 1,035 | -1,035 | — |
| GAVRIELOV MOSHE | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 1,035 | -1,035 | — |
| GAVRIELOV MOSHE | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.6.2026 | 426 | -426 | $297.41 |
| Sundstrom Karl-Henrik | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.6.2026 | 513 | -513 | $297.41 |
| GAVRIELOV MOSHE | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 1,035 | +1,035 | — |
| CLAYTON ANNETTE K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 1,035 | -1,035 | — |
| Chunyuan Gu | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.6.2026 | 418 | -418 | $297.41 |
| Foxx Anthony R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 1,035 | +1,035 | — |
| Staiblin Jasmin | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 841 | +841 | — |
| SUMME GREGORY L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 1,035 | +1,035 | — |
| Olving Lena | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 1,035 | +1,035 | — |
| CLAYTON ANNETTE K | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 841 | +841 | — |
| Olving Lena | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 1,035 | -1,035 | — |
| Olving Lena | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 841 | +841 | — |
| Foxx Anthony R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 1,035 | -1,035 | — |
| CLAYTON ANNETTE K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.6.2026 | 513 | -513 | $297.41 |
| Olving Lena | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.6.2026 | 513 | -513 | $297.41 |
| SUMME GREGORY L | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 841 | +841 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,592,350 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,874,633 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology