Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$6,242.23
▲ $55.80 (+0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/18 09:36 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$16.63B
Day Range
$6,175.00 - $6,308.61
52-Week Range
$5,501.01 - $8,200.01
Beta
—
Next Earnings
20.10.2026
NVR is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-23.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/22 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Return on equity (ROE)
Return on equity (ROE): 34.7% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $5,280.54 vs. price $6,242.23 (-15.4%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
82/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
-3.3%
Median 40D Outcome
75/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
27%
+1.9% … +4.9%
🟡 Base
13%
+0.1% … +0.6%
🔴 Bearish
60%
-8.3% … -2.9%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 27% (95% CI 11%–52%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -2.6%.
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 40% (20%–64%) | +0.7% | -1.7% … +2.9% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 20% (7%–45%) | -1.5% | -5.3% … +0.7% | +0.8% |
| 20D | 27% (11%–52%) | -2.6% | -3.7% … +1.0% | +1.3% |
| 40D | 33% (15%–58%) | -3.3% | -7.0% … +5.4% | +3.0% |
| 60D | 40% (20%–64%) | -2.2% | -7.5% … +5.9% | +3.7% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-24 | 82/100 | Downtrend | +1.0% | +2.7% |
| 2021-10-07 | 81/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +3.7% | +18.2% |
| 2023-10-06 | 81/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -2.6% | +14.9% |
| 2021-08-24 | 79/100 | Uptrend | -3.0% | -0.3% |
| 2025-06-16 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +2.1% | +18.2% |
| 2022-09-09 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -0.2% | +9.1% |
| 2025-01-14 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -10.4% | -14.1% |
| 2025-03-05 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -1.2% | -3.7% |
| 2023-08-28 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -4.1% | +1.7% |
| 2025-03-25 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -3.3% | -2.2% |
| 2026-01-08 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +8.5% | -12.1% |
| 2025-10-21 | 77/100 | Consolidation | -8.3% | -3.0% |
| 2025-10-02 | 76/100 | Consolidation | -10.2% | -8.9% |
| 2026-01-27 | 76/100 | Consolidation | -2.9% | -11.1% |
| 2025-12-09 | 76/100 | Downtrend | +0.9% | -6.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLY (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
No data available
Value
43
Momentum
18
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
62
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING NVR...
Recent media coverage on **NVR, Inc.**—a major U.S. homebuilder—has focused on its **moderately optimistic but cautious market outlook**, with analysts noting its lagging performance relative to broader market trends. While NVR hasn’t been the primary subject in recent headlines, discussions around the housing sector, including supply chain costs and margin pressures, indirectly highlight challenges faced by builders like NVR. No specific company developments were detailed beyond general analyst sentiment.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about NVR, Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
48
Fundamentals
62
Technical
18
Valuation
43
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-4%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+25
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **herding** state (82) reflects NVR’s near-identical -2.9% drop with peers (-3.1%), signaling passive alignment rather than aggressive chasing or fleeing. While **euphoria** (20) and **overconfidence** (14) persist due to +16% DCF premiums, the negative momentum (-1.9% ROC) and neutral RSI (47) temper extreme optimism. The **narrative gap** (26) and **confirmation bias** (34) suggest investors selectively prioritize narrative over stagnant fundamentals. The key question: *Is the herding behavior a lagging indicator of broader sector weakness, or will it sustain until valuation gaps close?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:58 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Wall Street analysts maintain a moderately optimistic outlook about the stock’s prospects."
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 73/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for NVR reflects deep methodological disagreements about what makes a stock attractive. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score suggests the stock’s technical cycle position is near oversold, implying a potential rebound, while Charles Mackay’s moderate score signals no obvious crowd-driven mania—both leaning cautiously optimistic. In contrast, the majority of methodologies—from Graham’s strict valuation rules to Lynch’s growth-at-a-reasonable-price standard—reject NVR outright, citing weak fundamentals, volatility, or lack of quality/growth traits. Even the more flexible approaches, like Howard Marks’ mixed verdict or the Efficient Market Hypothesis’ lukewarm stance, highlight skepticism about whether the stock’s strengths justify its risks or outperformance. The contrast underscores whether investors prioritize technical signals, crowd psychology, or fundamental stability—with some seeing opportunity in momentum or undervaluation, while others dismiss it as speculative or overpriced.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 73
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 64
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 49
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 49
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 38
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 29
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 28
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 21
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 14
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 11
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 8
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 0
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
13.0%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
34.7%
ROA
22.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$462.00
Cash
$1.96B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$6,242.23
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$5,280.54
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-15.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-0.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.3% | $1.09B | $1.00B |
| 2 | 0.4% | $1.10B | $924.02M |
| 3 | 1.1% | $1.11B | $857.03M |
| 4 | 1.8% | $1.13B | $800.41M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.16B | $752.68M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.10B
Terminal Value
$18.26B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$11.87B
Enterprise Value
$16.21B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$16.21B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1,259.28
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1,259.28
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Barchart · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Trefis · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
CNW Group · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
MarketBeat · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 17.8.2026
NVR, Inc. (NVR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NVR currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NVR's estimated fair value is $5,280.54, which is 15.4% below the current price of $6,242.23. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NVR's technical score is 18/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Return on equity (ROE): 34.7% — strong; P/E: 14.3; Return on assets (ROA): 22.9% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $5,280.54 vs. price $6,242.23 (-15.4%); Calmar: 0.01 (3y annualized return 0.6% / max drawdown 43.9%); Revenue growth (last year): -1.9%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for NVR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oliver George | Open Market Purchase | 7.8.2026 | 63 | +63 | $6,431.51 |
| Oliver George | Open Market Purchase | 7.8.2026 | 63 | +63 | $6,431.51 |
| Martinez Melquiades R. | Gift | 30.7.2026 | 29 | -29 | — |
| Martinez Melquiades R. | Gift | 30.7.2026 | 162 | -29 | — |
| Ross Susan Williamson | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 238 | +238 | $1,700.00 |
| Ross Susan Williamson | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 238 | -238 | — |
| Ross Susan Williamson | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 624 | +238 | $1,700.00 |
| Ross Susan Williamson | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 0 | -238 | — |
| FESTA ALFRED E | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 154 | +154 | — |
| ROSIER WILLIAM GRADY | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 154 | +154 | — |
| PREISER DAVID A | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 154 | +154 | — |
| Ross Susan Williamson | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 154 | +154 | — |
| Kelpy Matthew B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 272 | +272 | — |
| Oliver George | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 154 | +154 | — |
| SAVILLE PAUL C | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 2,619 | +2,619 | — |
| Malzahn Daniel David | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 1,335 | +1,335 | — |
| Bredow Eugene James | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 2,619 | +2,619 | — |
| ANDREWS CHARLES ELLIOTT | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 154 | +154 | — |
| Martinez Melquiades R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 154 | +154 | — |
| Jung Alexandra A | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 154 | +154 | — |
| Bredow Eugene James | I | 14.5.2026 | 140 | +60 | $5,776.15 |
| PREISER DAVID A | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 154 | +154 | — |
| SAVILLE PAUL C | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 2,619 | +2,619 | — |
| ANDREWS CHARLES ELLIOTT | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 154 | +154 | — |
| BAILEY SALLIE B | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 154 | +154 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
108,108 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 114,469 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology