Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$410.73
▲ $14.28 (+3.6%)
Market data updated: 09/15 08:10 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/15/2026
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
$115.34B
Day Range
$396.76 - $413.28
52-Week Range
$161.93 - $413.28
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
MPC is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+128.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 31.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $210.07 vs. price $410.73 (-48.9%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
81/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
+3.4%
Median 40D Outcome
61/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
33%
+4.4% … +7.9%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.8% … -0.6%
🔴 Bearish
53%
-9.3% … -6.6%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 33% (95% CI 15%–58%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -2.2%.
No major conflicts found.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
14 occurrence(s) · 29% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 33% (15%–58%) | -2.9% | -5.3% … +1.2% | +0.7% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.3% | -4.8% … +5.1% | +1.5% |
| 20D | 33% (15%–58%) | -2.2% | -7.5% … +3.8% | +3.0% |
| 40D | 60% (36%–80%) | +3.4% | -0.6% … +8.3% | +4.4% |
| 60D | 73% (48%–89%) | +4.0% | +0.2% … +12.1% | +6.3% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-09 | 81/100 | Uptrend | -14.7% | -19.5% |
| 2021-03-11 | 81/100 | Uptrend | -8.9% | +9.2% |
| 2026-03-31 | 78/100 | Uptrend | -1.0% | +4.0% |
| 2018-04-27 | 78/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -5.4% | -9.4% |
| 2025-07-11 | 78/100 | Uptrend | -10.6% | +7.6% |
| 2022-04-21 | 77/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +7.9% | -1.0% |
| 2017-11-10 | 77/100 | Uptrend | +4.4% | +1.7% |
| 2021-02-18 | 77/100 | Uptrend | +3.2% | +17.3% |
| 2019-10-30 | 76/100 | Uptrend | -7.1% | -20.0% |
| 2026-06-12 | 76/100 | Uptrend | +15.1% | +51.5% |
| 2026-03-16 | 76/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -2.2% | +15.0% |
| 2025-09-17 | 75/100 | Uptrend | -0.5% | +1.3% |
| 2022-11-14 | 74/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -7.8% | +5.2% |
| 2023-08-25 | 74/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +7.1% | +3.5% |
| 2026-05-19 | 73/100 | Uptrend | -7.0% | +35.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
51
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
79
Risk
56
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
53
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING MPC...
Recent media coverage of Marathon Petroleum (MPC) has centered on its stock performance amid geopolitical tensions and rising oil prices. Analysts like UBS and Wells Fargo have raised price targets and maintained bullish ratings, citing potential benefits from Middle East supply concerns and higher crude prices. The company was frequently highlighted as a "Strong Buy" or "Bull of the Day" stock, alongside broader energy sector gains driven by oil price volatility.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Marathon Petroleum. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
71
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
88
Fundamentals
53
Technical
79
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price (3M)
+68%
Market Narrative
92
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+50
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests traders are fixated on a near-term resistance level (anchoring), while extreme valuation (+89% vs. DCF) and momentum (+10.9% ROC) fuel euphoria and overconfidence. The narrative gap (+47) implies selective attention to bullish narratives despite stagnant fundamentals. The key question is whether traders will sustain anchoring near resistance or if momentum-driven euphoria will persist despite overvaluation. The absence of panic or loss aversion signals no immediate distress, but the overbought RSI (82) raises caution about sustainability.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:33 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"UBS Adjusts Marathon Petroleum price target to $450 From $321, Maintains Buy Rating"
"Energy stocks rise premarket as oil prices climb on Middle East supply fears"
"Marathon Petroleum (MPC) is a Trending Stock — Zacks.com users have been paying close attention"
"Bull of the Day: Marathon Petroleum (MPC)"
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides methodologies sharply, with a strong cluster of growth-oriented investors like Jesse Livermore (77), Thorstein Veblen (71), and Peter Lynch (70) seeing it as a high-potential opportunity, framing it as a trend-following or value-aligned play. Meanwhile, value and defensive investors—particularly Benjamin Graham (18) and Samuel Armstrong Nelson (0)—reject it outright, citing overvaluation, stretched cycles, or outright speculative risks. The middle ground is occupied by pragmatic investors like Gerald Loeb (58) and Morgan Housel (46), who acknowledge moderate risks but still view it as holdable rather than a slam dunk. The stark contrast between Fisher (21), who demands quality and growth, and Marks (20), who warns of late-cycle dangers, underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in momentum or whether it’s already priced for perfection.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 80
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 70
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 43
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 42
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 27
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 21
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 20
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 18
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 14
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 8
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 0
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
10.0%
Operating Margin
6.2%
Net Margin
3.0%
EBITDA Margin
8.7%
ROE
23.4%
ROA
4.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$13.24
Cash
$3.67B
Total Debt
$2.37B
Current Ratio
1.26
Debt/Equity
0.14
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 19.8.2026 | $1.000 |
| 20.5.2026 | $1.000 |
| 19.5.2026 | $1.000 |
| 18.2.2026 | $1.000 |
| 17.2.2026 | $1.000 |
| 19.11.2025 | $1.000 |
| 18.11.2025 | $1.000 |
| 20.8.2025 | $0.910 |
| 19.8.2025 | $0.910 |
| 21.5.2025 | $0.910 |
| 20.5.2025 | $0.910 |
| 19.2.2025 | $0.910 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$410.73
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$210.07
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-48.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $4.53B | $4.15B |
| 2 | -3.1% | $4.39B | $3.69B |
| 3 | -1.2% | $4.33B | $3.35B |
| 4 | 0.6% | $4.36B | $3.09B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $4.47B | $2.90B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$4.77B
Terminal Value
$70.46B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$45.80B
Enterprise Value
$62.98B
Net Debt
$-1.30B
Equity Value
$64.28B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$56.58
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$17.14
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
CNBC · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
MarketBeat · 12.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MPC currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MPC's estimated fair value is $210.07, which is 48.9% below the current price of $410.73. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MPC's technical score is 79/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 31.2%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 23.4% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $210.07 vs. price $410.73 (-48.9%); Revenue growth (last year): -4.4%; Free cash flow growth: -22.3%.
Yes — MPC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 13 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lyon Shawn M | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $375.75 |
| Lyon Shawn M | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 425 | -425 | $368.51 |
| Brzezinski Erin M | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 570 | -570 | $362.79 |
| Brzezinski Erin M | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 1,576 | -570 | $362.79 |
| Benson Molly R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $47.73 |
| Benson Molly R | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 7,196 | -7,196 | $358.57 |
| Benson Molly R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 7,196 | -7,196 | — |
| Benson Molly R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $47.73 |
| Benson Molly R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | — |
| Benson Molly R | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $358.57 |
| Benson Molly R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | — |
| Benson Molly R | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $358.57 |
| Benson Molly R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 7,196 | +7,196 | $47.73 |
| Lyon Shawn M | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 2,500 | -2,500 | $350.00 |
| Henschen Michael A II | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 6,011 | -6,011 | $341.56 |
| Henschen Michael A II | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 10,889 | -6,011 | $341.56 |
| Mannen Maryann T. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 908 | -908 | $311.78 |
| Mannen Maryann T. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 110,939 | -908 | $311.78 |
| Henschen Michael A II | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 4,964 | +4,964 | $49.94 |
| Henschen Michael A II | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 4,964 | -4,964 | — |
| Henschen Michael A II | Open Market Sale | 4.6.2026 | 4,964 | -4,964 | $268.85 |
| Henschen Michael A II | Open Market Sale | 4.6.2026 | 1,372 | -1,372 | $268.75 |
| Henschen Michael A II | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 21,864 | +4,964 | $49.94 |
| Henschen Michael A II | Open Market Sale | 4.6.2026 | 16,900 | -4,964 | $268.85 |
| Henschen Michael A II | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 0 | -4,964 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,601,383 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,786,536 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
65.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 67.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology