Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$129.35
▲ $0.11 (+0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/17 11:17 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$16.23B
Day Range
$128.00 - $131.02
52-Week Range
$98.86 - $205.77
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
LDOS is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-29.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 20.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.23 (3y annualized return 11.4% / max drawdown 50.3%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
72/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
87/100
Analog Quality
+0.7%
Median 40D Outcome
54/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
60%
+2.6% … +9.4%
🟡 Base
7%
+0.3% … +0.3%
🔴 Bearish
33%
-6.8% … -6.0%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 60% (95% CI 36%–80%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.6%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
7 occurrence(s) · 43% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 33% (15%–58%) | +0.0% | -4.7% … +3.0% | +0.4% |
| 10D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.4% | -5.8% … +3.1% | +0.9% |
| 20D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.6% | -5.9% … +6.0% | +1.4% |
| 40D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.7% | -10.7% … +14.6% | +2.4% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +3.3% | -6.2% … +18.2% | +3.9% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-02 | 72/100 | Consolidation | +1.6% | -2.2% |
| 2022-02-15 | 70/100 | Downtrend | +20.8% | +19.0% |
| 2020-10-30 | 70/100 | Downtrend | +21.3% | +30.8% |
| 2025-02-27 | 69/100 | Downtrend | +4.6% | +17.6% |
| 2020-06-18 | 68/100 | Consolidation | -11.2% | -11.1% |
| 2025-06-06 | 68/100 | Consolidation | +9.4% | +20.0% |
| 2018-11-02 | 68/100 | Downtrend | +0.3% | -5.2% |
| 2018-12-12 | 68/100 | Downtrend | -6.8% | +6.0% |
| 2020-09-11 | 68/100 | Downtrend | +4.2% | +18.7% |
| 2020-10-14 | 66/100 | Downtrend | +7.3% | +17.5% |
| 2025-02-04 | 65/100 | Downtrend | -5.8% | +3.3% |
| 2026-04-02 | 64/100 | Downtrend | -6.0% | -35.2% |
| 2023-03-22 | 64/100 | Downtrend | +1.4% | -5.9% |
| 2026-03-19 | 63/100 | Downtrend | -6.5% | -30.9% |
| 2025-12-15 | 62/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +2.6% | -6.5% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
63
Value
55
Momentum
41
Risk
54
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
69
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING LDOS...
Recent media coverage of Leidos has primarily centered on its stock performance and internal developments. After reporting earnings, Leidos’ shares rose 5.5%, prompting speculation about future market movements. Additionally, a board member sold a portion of his shares, raising questions about insider sentiment. While broader defense industry headlines mention supply chain risks tied to China’s mineral restrictions—impacting laser weapon production—Leidos itself isn’t directly highlighted beyond its stock activity. No substantive operational or strategic updates were provided.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Leidos. News trend score: 74. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
16
Fundamentals
69
Technical
41
Valuation
55
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+21%
Market Narrative
44
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+2
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for LDOS suggests a **herding dynamic** as it underperforms its peers today, consistent with relative weakness. The narrative gap (-8) hints at a slight disconnect between market sentiment (34) and objective reality (42), but no extreme bias dominates. The absence of FOMO or euphoria signals no aggressive chasing, while overconfidence is neutralized by price vs. fundamentals misalignment. The key question: *Is this underperformance a temporary peer rotation or a deeper structural concern?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:37 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"China just restricted 12 minerals that defense contractors need to build the next generation of laser weapons"
"Leidos (LDOS) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock?"
"Elizabeth Robertson... has joined Applied Aerospace & Defense as executive vice president of business development"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for LDOS split sharply between bullish and cautious camps, reflecting starkly different priorities. The highest-scoring models—Charles Mackay (92) and Samuel Armstrong Nelson (88)—focus on avoiding crowd-driven bubbles and cycle timing, both concluding the stock isn’t overvalued or in a speculative frenzy. Meanwhile, growth-oriented investors like Peter Lynch (74) and Edgar Lawrence Smith (73) see LDOS as a long-term candidate, praising its undervalued growth potential or 'buy-and-hold' appeal. In contrast, Fisher (38) and Schwager (49) dismiss it outright, lacking the quality or trend clarity they demand, while Graham’s traditional (60) and enterprising (47) frameworks find it insufficiently discounted. The divide underscores whether the stock’s value lies in its cyclical positioning (Nelson, Marks) or its growth fundamentals (Lynch, Smith)—or if it’s simply too murky for disciplined investors like Fisher or Livermore.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 87
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 74
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 71
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 67
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 60
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 60
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 60
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 47
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 34
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 17
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
18.0%
Operating Margin
12.3%
Net Margin
8.4%
EBITDA Margin
14.0%
ROE
29.5%
ROA
10.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$11.31
Cash
$1.11B
Total Debt
$20.00M
Current Ratio
1.70
Debt/Equity
0.00
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.430 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.430 |
| 16.3.2026 | $0.430 |
| 15.3.2026 | $0.430 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.430 |
| 14.12.2025 | $0.430 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.400 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.400 |
| 16.6.2025 | $0.400 |
| 15.6.2025 | $0.400 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.400 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.400 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$37.82
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$14.49
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 10 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Leidos (LDOS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
LDOS currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
LDOS's technical score is 41/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 20.8%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 29.5% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.23 (3y annualized return 11.4% / max drawdown 50.3%); Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — LDOS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May Gary Stephen | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $140.85 |
| Geer Noel B | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 8,500 | -8,500 | $140.59 |
| Geer Noel B | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $141.07 |
| Geer Noel B | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 35,774 | -8,500 | $140.59 |
| Geer Noel B | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 34,274 | -1,500 | $141.07 |
| Cage Christopher R | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.8.2026 | 4,584 | -4,584 | $118.72 |
| Stevens Roy E | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.8.2026 | 4,584 | -4,584 | $118.72 |
| Porter Elizabeth A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.8.2026 | 5,092 | -5,092 | $118.72 |
| Cage Christopher R | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.8.2026 | 60,245 | -4,584 | $118.72 |
| Stevens Roy E | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.8.2026 | 57,637 | -4,584 | $118.72 |
| Porter Elizabeth A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.8.2026 | 44,384 | -5,092 | $118.72 |
| KRAEMER HARRY M JANSEN JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.7.2026 | 310.431 | +310.431 | — |
| KRAEMER HARRY M JANSEN JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.7.2026 | 131,348 | +310 | — |
| Antal Daniel J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5.749 | +5.749 | — |
| Stevens Roy E | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 7.803 | +7.803 | — |
| Cage Christopher R | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 113.225 | +113.225 | — |
| KRAEMER HARRY M JANSEN JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 565.122 | +565.122 | — |
| SHAPARD ROBERT S | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 6.957 | +6.957 | — |
| KRAEMER HARRY M JANSEN JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 131,037 | +565 | — |
| SHAPARD ROBERT S | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,632 | +7 | — |
| Antal Daniel J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 10,743 | +6 | — |
| Cage Christopher R | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 31,840 | +113 | — |
| Stevens Roy E | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,805 | +8 | — |
| KRAEMER HARRY M JANSEN JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 1,281 | +1,281 | — |
| KRAEMER HARRY M JANSEN JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 1,067 | +1,067 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,623,584 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,200,289 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology