Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$221.50
▼ $1.34 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/17 06:24 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$16.33B
Day Range
$219.44 - $224.40
52-Week Range
$158.19 - $243.80
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
IEX is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+35.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.45
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $113.69 vs. price $221.50 (-48.7%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
81/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
+0.7%
Median 40D Outcome
72/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
40%
+2.1% … +9.3%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.7% … -0.3%
🔴 Bearish
47%
-5.9% … -3.1%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 40% (95% CI 20%–64%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -0.9%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
2 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Echo #2 — Oversold Reversal
3 occurrence(s) · 33% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.8% | -0.7% … +4.0% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 33% (15%–58%) | -0.2% | -1.6% … +1.8% | +0.5% |
| 20D | 40% (20%–64%) | -0.9% | -3.9% … +2.3% | +0.9% |
| 40D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.7% | -5.4% … +10.2% | +2.3% |
| 60D | 60% (36%–80%) | +4.4% | -4.3% … +10.5% | +4.0% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-21 | 81/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +1.3% | +11.4% |
| 2023-03-23 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -0.1% | -5.9% |
| 2019-05-28 | 79/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +10.5% | +9.5% |
| 2018-06-22 | 78/100 | Consolidation | -0.9% | +12.5% |
| 2023-01-05 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +1.8% | +1.5% |
| 2018-04-11 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -3.2% | -2.6% |
| 2019-10-10 | 77/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +2.8% | +9.4% |
| 2023-09-15 | 77/100 | Downtrend | -6.3% | -3.0% |
| 2023-10-02 | 76/100 | Downtrend | -7.9% | +4.4% |
| 2021-08-20 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -3.0% | +6.0% |
| 2026-06-01 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +9.3% | +13.2% |
| 2023-02-22 | 75/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -2.7% | -8.7% |
| 2024-05-02 | 75/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -5.4% | -5.7% |
| 2024-12-12 | 74/100 | Uptrend | -4.6% | -20.8% |
| 2025-11-20 | 73/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +9.1% | +27.5% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
42
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
19
Risk
54
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
75
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING IEX...
Recent media coverage of IDEX Corporation (IEX) has centered on its stock performance and market positioning. Analysts note the company’s shares have risen modestly—8.9% over six months—though trailing the S&P 500’s 12.3% gain, with cautious optimism about future growth. Comparisons to peers in gas and liquid handling sectors highlight its Q2 earnings performance, while discussions on earnings reports and analyst predictions emphasize mixed but cautiously positive outlooks. No substantive operational or strategic shifts are detailed.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about IDEX Corporation. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
31
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
47
Fundamentals
75
Technical
19
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
71
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+34
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests traders are overestimating value (+98% above DCF) while ignoring weak momentum, consistent with overconfidence and anchoring. The extreme narrative gap (73 vs. 37) implies optimism far exceeds fundamentals. The key question is whether traders will adjust expectations as momentum remains negative. The disconnect between sentiment (100/100) and technicals may signal complacency rather than true conviction.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 09:29 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"IDEX trades at $230.28 and has moved in lockstep with the market"
"analysts are cautiously optimistic about the stock’s prospects"
"Idex (IEX) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock?"
"IDEX (NYSE:IEX) Vs Other Gas and Liquid Handling Stocks"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 91/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for IEX split sharply between those emphasizing defensive resilience and those skeptical of its long-term fundamentals or market fit. Bagehot and Nelson’s high scores reflect a focus on liquidity and cyclical positioning, suggesting the stock could weather volatility or benefit from a market rebound. Meanwhile, Schwager’s disciplined approach also sees potential, but the middle tier—including Loeb and Smith—cautions that while the stock may preserve capital or offer moderate returns, it lacks the depth for sustained holding. On the other end, Graham’s strict valuation and Fisher’s quality thresholds dismiss it outright, while Marks and Veblen flag overvaluation or speculative tendencies. The divide underscores a tension between short-term defensive plays and long-term value/growth criteria, with only a few methodologies finding any merit.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 91
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 91
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 72
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 68
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 62
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 58
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 49
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 28
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 27
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 26
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 24
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$215.51
Range Bottom
$243.80
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
44.5%
Operating Margin
20.2%
Net Margin
14.0%
EBITDA Margin
20.2%
ROE
12.0%
ROA
7.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$6.41
Cash
$580.00M
Total Debt
$1.82B
Current Ratio
2.86
Debt/Equity
0.45
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 6.7.2026 | $0.730 |
| 5.7.2026 | $0.730 |
| 22.5.2026 | $0.730 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.730 |
| 16.1.2026 | $0.710 |
| 15.1.2026 | $0.710 |
| 10.10.2025 | $0.710 |
| 9.10.2025 | $0.710 |
| 11.7.2025 | $0.710 |
| 10.7.2025 | $0.710 |
| 19.5.2025 | $0.710 |
| 18.5.2025 | $0.710 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$221.50
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$113.69
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-48.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8% | $634.29M | $581.92M |
| 2 | 2.8% | $651.75M | $548.56M |
| 3 | 2.7% | $669.14M | $516.70M |
| 4 | 2.6% | $686.43M | $486.28M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $703.59M | $457.29M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$616.80M
Terminal Value
$11.10B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$7.21B
Enterprise Value
$9.80B
Net Debt
$1.24B
Equity Value
$8.56B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$53.49
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$8.42
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Business Wire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
StockStory · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Barchart · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
StockStory · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
Trefis · 21.8.2026
IDEX Corporation (IEX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
IEX currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, IEX's estimated fair value is $113.69, which is 48.7% below the current price of $221.50. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
IEX's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.45; Current ratio: 2.86; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $113.69 vs. price $221.50 (-48.7%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.04 (3y annualized return 1.4% / max drawdown 35.9%).
Yes — IEX has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lausas Allison S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.8.2026 | 645 | -645 | $230.28 |
| Anderson Lisa M | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 385 | -385 | $238.59 |
| Anderson Lisa M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 385 | -385 | — |
| Anderson Lisa M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 385 | +385 | $93.27 |
| Anderson Lisa M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 4,712 | +385 | $93.27 |
| Anderson Lisa M | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 4,327 | -385 | $238.59 |
| Anderson Lisa M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 0 | -385 | — |
| ASHLEMAN ERIC D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.5.2026 | 15,385 | +15,385 | $93.27 |
| ASHLEMAN ERIC D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.5.2026 | 15,385 | -15,385 | — |
| ASHLEMAN ERIC D | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 4,915 | -4,915 | $215.81 |
| ASHLEMAN ERIC D | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 10,470 | -10,470 | $214.95 |
| ASHLEMAN ERIC D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.5.2026 | 82,043 | +15,385 | $93.27 |
| ASHLEMAN ERIC D | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 71,573 | -10,470 | $214.95 |
| ASHLEMAN ERIC D | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 66,658 | -4,915 | $215.81 |
| ASHLEMAN ERIC D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.5.2026 | 0 | -15,385 | — |
| Glastra Matthijs | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 805 | +805 | — |
| Disher Stephanie | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 805 | +805 | — |
| BUTHMAN MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 805 | +805 | — |
| Beck Mark A | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 805 | +805 | — |
| Christenson Carl R | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 805 | +805 | — |
| Gunter Lakecia N | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 805 | +805 | — |
| Watts Stanfield Paris | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 805 | +805 | — |
| Quiroz Alejandro | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 805 | +805 | — |
| Helmkamp Katrina L | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 1,035 | +1,035 | — |
| Helmkamp Katrina L | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 14,235 | +1,035 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,892,602 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,894,657 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
42.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 51.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology