Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$0.57
▲ $0.06 (+10.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:49 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$31.64M
Day Range
$0.52 - $0.64
52-Week Range
$0.36 - $4.70
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$0.35
Resistance
$0.65
-83.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/24 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 33.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -218.9% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
70/100
Similarity
7
Historical Matches
70/100
Analog Quality
-31.0%
Median 40D Outcome
0/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
14%
+9.6% … +9.6%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
86%
-31.6% … -13.6%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 7 similar historical cases for this stock, 14% (95% CI 3%–51%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -19.7%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
1 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 14% (3%–51%) | -11.8% | -16.2% … -10.4% | -3.0% |
| 10D | 29% (8%–64%) | -11.3% | -20.5% … +2.7% | -3.5% |
| 20D | 14% (3%–51%) | -19.7% | -30.6% … -6.8% | -3.6% |
| 40D | 0% (0%–35%) | -31.0% | -55.9% … -15.2% | -26.9% |
| 60D | 0% (0%–35%) | -58.9% | -65.1% … -38.2% | -59.4% |
Sample size: 7 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | 70/100 | High Volatility | -58.4% | -66.2% |
| 2026-04-27 | 64/100 | High Volatility | -32.6% | -70.3% |
| 2026-04-10 | 54/100 | ✓ High Volatility | +9.6% | -64.1% |
| 2026-03-23 | 50/100 | ✓ High Volatility | -2.0% | -58.9% |
| 2026-06-23 | 45/100 | ✓ High Volatility | -19.7% | -10.4% |
| 2026-06-05 | 39/100 | High Volatility | -28.7% | -29.1% |
| 2026-03-09 | 38/100 | ✓ High Volatility | -11.6% | -47.2% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity.
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $0.57
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -1 to 29 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $0.57
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 6 to 46 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
No data available
Value
55
Momentum
59
Risk
26
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
29
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Fold Holdings, Inc.. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 6 vs. 6 out of the last 17 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
39
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
39
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
29
Technical
59
Valuation
55
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
39
Narrative Gap
+29
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 74
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 58
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 58
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 57
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 57
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 47
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 30
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 29
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 23
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 13
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 10
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 8
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (6 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
-218.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-110.5%
ROA
-45.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.65
Cash
$7.65M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.86
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$1.49
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.49
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 5 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 17 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
Motley Fool · 18.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
Moby · 12.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 11.8.2026
Benzinga · 11.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 10.8.2026
Zacks · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 15.7.2026
TheStreet · 10.6.2026
InvestorsHub · 10.6.2026
Insider Monkey · 2.6.2026
Fold Holdings, Inc. (FLD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FLD currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
FLD's technical score is 59/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 33.9%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 85.2%; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -218.9% (negative); ATR: 9.2% of price; Current ratio: 0.86.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for FLD.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dickman Thomas J | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 6 | -6 | $0.46 |
| Repass Wolfe | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 844 | -844 | $0.46 |
| Repass Wolfe | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 493 | -493 | $0.46 |
| Reeves William Brian Poppic | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 493 | -493 | $0.46 |
| Repass Wolfe | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 5 | -5 | $0.46 |
| Reeves William Brian Poppic | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 5,288 | -5,288 | $0.46 |
| Repass Wolfe | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 2,639 | -2,639 | — |
| Repass Wolfe | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 17 | -17 | — |
| Repass Wolfe | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 1,539 | -1,539 | — |
| Repass Wolfe | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 17 | +17 | — |
| Repass Wolfe | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 2,639 | +2,639 | — |
| Reeves William Brian Poppic | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 1,075 | +1,075 | — |
| Reeves William Brian Poppic | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 11,549 | -11,549 | — |
| Reeves William Brian Poppic | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 11,549 | +11,549 | — |
| Dickman Thomas J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 17 | -17 | — |
| Dickman Thomas J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 17 | +17 | — |
| Repass Wolfe | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 1,539 | +1,539 | — |
| Reeves William Brian Poppic | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 1,075 | -1,075 | — |
| Dickman Thomas J | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | — |
| Reeves William Brian Poppic | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 5,432,085 | -9,427 | $0.50 |
| Reeves William Brian Poppic | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 9,427 | -9,427 | $0.50 |
| Reeves William Brian Poppic | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 5,441,512 | -8,905 | $0.48 |
| Reeves William Brian Poppic | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 8,905 | -8,905 | $0.48 |
| Reeves William Brian Poppic | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 5,450,417 | -10,045 | $0.49 |
| Reeves William Brian Poppic | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 10,045 | -10,045 | $0.49 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
768,645 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 620,883 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
46.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 50.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology