Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$1.40
▲ $0.04 (+3.3%)
Market data updated: 09/17 07:04 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$28.45M
Day Range
$1.36 - $1.40
52-Week Range
$1.25 - $3.46
Beta
—
Next Earnings
12.11.2026
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
ACGLNArch Capital Group Ltd. Depositary Shares each Representing a 1/1000th Interest in a 4.550% Non-Cumulative Preferred Share Series G
ACGLOArch Capital Group Ltd. Depositary Shares Each Representing 1/1000th Interest in a Share of 5.45% Non-Cumulative Preferred Shares Series F
-60.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $3.19 vs. price $1.40 (+128.8%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -2.6% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $1.29
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 16 to 42 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
58
Value
67
Momentum
32
Risk
34
Sentiment
32
Fundamental
21
Institutional
50
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Atlantic American Corporation has primarily centered on regulatory compliance issues, particularly delayed SEC filings. The company received a Nasdaq noncompliance notice in August 2026 for failing to submit its second-quarter 10-Q report and remaining delinquent on its 2025 annual 10-K filing, triggering a 20% stock surge after hours. Additionally, AM Best placed its credit ratings under review with negative implications in June 2026, reflecting broader investor concerns.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Atlantic American Corporation. News trend score: 32. Reason: 4 of the last 7 articles are negative, versus 1 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
13
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
87
Fundamentals
21
Technical
32
Valuation
67
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-28%
Market Narrative
20
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
-20
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for AAME suggests a strong **loss aversion** bias, as the stock’s 18.6% drop over three months and muted volume align with investors clinging to positions to avoid further losses. The absence of FOMO or euphoria—despite peer underperformance—implies no aggressive buying pressure, while elevated volatility hints at cautious selling rather than panic. The narrative gap (-17) further signals a disconnect between investor perceptions (optimistic) and market reality (undervalued but weak). The key question is whether the stock’s undervaluation (-59% vs. DCF) will eventually outweigh loss aversion or if further declines will solidify defensive positioning.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:08 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"received a notice from Nasdaq over delayed SEC filings (Form 10-Q and 10-K)"
"AM Best places credit ratings under review with negative implications"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Gerald M. Loeb — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for AAME reflects deep methodological divides between value, cycle, and growth-oriented investors. Benjamin Graham’s defensive and enterprising frameworks both score maximally, signaling a strong fundamental case—likely due to low valuation or robust balance-sheet metrics—but his enterprising version hesitates due to data gaps. Meanwhile, Howard Marks’ cycle-aware approach leans bullish (92), seeing early-to-mid cycle strength, while his broader risk assessment (78) remains cautiously optimistic. In contrast, Fisher, Lynch, and Loeb dismiss it outright, prioritizing growth, momentum, or risk control, with Fisher’s 49 and Lynch’s 21 suggesting it lacks the signature traits of their preferred stocks. Even Nelson’s cyclical favorability (77) clashes with Livermore’s trend-against stance (30), illustrating how technical and macro perspectives can override fundamental appeal. The Efficient Market Hypothesis (37) and Veblen’s (30) skepticism further highlight skepticism toward active selection, framing the stock as either overanalyzed or fundamentally flawed by behavioral or market-structure lenses.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 99
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 95
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 72
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 60
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 47
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 34
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 23
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 21
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-2.6%
Net Margin
-2.3%
EBITDA Margin
-2.4%
ROE
-4.3%
ROA
-1.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.23
Cash
$35.57M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 9.4.2025 | $0.020 |
| 8.4.2025 | $0.020 |
| 11.4.2024 | $0.020 |
| 10.4.2024 | $0.020 |
| 21.8.2023 | $0.020 |
| 20.8.2023 | $0.020 |
| 12.4.2022 | $0.020 |
| 11.4.2022 | $0.020 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1.40
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$3.19
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+128.8%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-1.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1.9% | $4.49M | $4.12M |
| 2 | -0.8% | $4.45M | $3.75M |
| 3 | 0.3% | $4.47M | $3.45M |
| 4 | 1.4% | $4.53M | $3.21M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $4.64M | $3.02M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$4.58M
Terminal Value
$73.21M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$47.58M
Enterprise Value
$65.13M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$65.13M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$4.88
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$4.88
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 1 positive, 2 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 7 articles.
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
MT Newswires · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Business Wire · 17.6.2026
GlobeNewswire · 22.5.2026
Atlantic American Corporation (AAME) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 40/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AAME currently scores 40/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AAME's estimated fair value is $3.19, which is 128.8% above the current price of $1.40. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AAME's technical score is 32/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $3.19 vs. price $1.40 (+128.8%); Free cash flow growth: 80.0%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -2.6% (negative); Net margin: -2.3% (negative); ATR: 6.4% of price.
Yes — AAME has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 20 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROBINSON HARRIETT J | Open Market Sale | 30.12.2022 | 300,000 | -300,000 | $3.00 |
| ROBINSON HARRIETT J | Open Market Purchase | 30.12.2022 | 300,000 | +300,000 | $3.00 |
| Scheerer Joseph M | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.11.2022 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| HOWELL HILTON H JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.11.2022 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Preisinger Mark E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.11.2022 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Wheeler D Keehln | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.11.2022 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Howell Robin Robinson | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.11.2022 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Franklin Jeffrey Ross | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.9.2022 | 3,500 | -3,500 | $2.98 |
| HOWELL HILTON H JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.9.2022 | 9,334 | -9,334 | $2.98 |
| ROBINSON HARRIETT J | Open Market Sale | 31.3.2022 | 1,363,809 | -1,363,809 | $4.00 |
| ROBINSON HARRIETT J | Open Market Purchase | 31.3.2022 | 1,363,809 | +1,363,809 | $4.00 |
| HOWELL HILTON H JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.9.2021 | 9,334 | -9,334 | $3.99 |
| Franklin Jeffrey Ross | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.9.2021 | 3,500 | -3,500 | $3.99 |
| ROBINSON HARRIETT J | Gift | 4.2.2021 | 50,209 | -50,209 | — |
| ROBINSON HARRIETT J | Gift | 4.2.2021 | 50,209 | +50,209 | — |
| Howell Robin Robinson | Gift | 4.2.2021 | 50,209 | +50,209 | — |
| HOWELL HILTON H JR | Gift | 4.2.2021 | 50,209 | +50,209 | — |
| ROBINSON HARRIETT J | Gift | 4.2.2021 | 62,761 | +62,761 | — |
| ROBINSON HARRIETT J | Gift | 4.2.2021 | 62,761 | -62,761 | — |
| HOWELL HILTON H JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.9.2020 | 9,334 | -9,334 | $2.02 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
35,447 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 16,001 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
31.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 21.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology