Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$15.12
▲ $0.08 (+0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/17 03:27 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$5.16B
Day Range
$15.05 - $15.27
52-Week Range
$14.88 - $18.25
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
-15.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/22 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.9% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.24 (3y annualized return -7.0% / max drawdown 28.9%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
59
Quality
No data available
Value
60
Momentum
4
Risk
50
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
60
Institutional
25
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Arch Capital Group Ltd. has centered on its stock valuation and operational challenges. Despite reporting strong earnings, the company’s shares trade at a discount, reflecting investor concerns. Headlines highlight margin pressures in its insurance segment due to competitive pricing and catastrophe losses, while broader reinsurance market reports note profitability amid a softening market. Analysts also discuss earnings estimates and the company’s stock performance relative to market gains.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Arch Capital Group Ltd. Depositary Shares each Representing a 1/1000th Interest in a 4.550% Non-Cumulative Preferred Share Series G. News trend score: 98. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
36
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
66
Fundamentals
60
Technical
4
Valuation
60
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
58
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+20
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for ACGLN suggests traders are anchored near a 2.4% support level, overriding other biases like FOMO or panic. The narrative gap (55 vs. 38) hints at a disconnect where optimism (e.g., positive sentiment) may not align with technical reality (e.g., negative momentum). The key question is whether traders will break free from anchoring or if the stock consolidates near support. Elevated volatility and volume indicate heightened sensitivity to price movements, which could amplify either anchoring or panic depending on near-term catalysts.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:08 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Arch Capital (ACGL) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock? We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues."
"Arch Capital faces pressure from softer property pricing and catastrophe losses, weighing on Insurance segment growth and underwriting margins."
"Arch Capital’s (ACGL) Valuation Supports Strategic Capital Allocation"
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 26/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for ACGLN reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Benjamin Graham and his Enterprising Investor variant both rate it as a near-perfect candidate, seeing it as a statistically discounted asset with long-term potential—aligning with their focus on intrinsic value and margin of safety. Meanwhile, more cyclical or trend-following approaches like Nelson’s and Livermore’s split sharply: Nelson sees it as oversold and favorable for a buy-and-hold strategy, while Livermore’s negative score suggests it violates his core rule of trading with the prevailing market trend. Fisher and Marks, though more cautious, still acknowledge its merits—Fisher as a solid but not exceptional business, Marks as a decent play despite potential overvaluation—while the efficient-market camp dismisses it as unexceptional compared to passive indexing. The contrast between Veblen’s skepticism (flagging it as growth-chasing) and Mackay’s reassurance (no crowd mania) further highlights how subjective criteria—like whether growth is justified or if sentiment is irrational—can swing conclusions entirely.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 86
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 79
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 70
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 69
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 62
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 59
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 26
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 12 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
22.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
18.2%
ROA
5.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$11.83
Cash
$993.00M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.284 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.284 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.284 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.284 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.284 |
| 14.12.2025 | $0.284 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.284 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.284 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.284 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.284 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.284 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.284 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$64.39
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$61.36
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 6 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 6.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 25.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 20.8.2026
Zacks · 19.8.2026
Arch Capital Group Ltd. Depositary Shares each Representing a 1/1000th Interest in a 4.550% Non-Cumulative Preferred Share Series G (ACGLN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ACGLN currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ACGLN's technical score is 4/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.9% of price; Net margin: 22.1% — strong; Revenue growth (last year): 14.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.24 (3y annualized return -7.0% / max drawdown 28.9%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — ACGLN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 24 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morin Francois | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.8.2026 | 11,010 | -11,010 | — |
| Morin Francois | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.8.2026 | 11,010 | +11,010 | $27.09 |
| Morin Francois | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 11,010 | -11,010 | $99.32 |
| PASQUESI JOHN M | Gift | 11.6.2026 | 1,006,700 | +1,006,700 | — |
| PASQUESI JOHN M | Gift | 11.6.2026 | 1,006,700 | -1,006,700 | — |
| Posner Brian S | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $19.66 |
| Posner Brian S | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $17.14 |
| KILCOYNE MOIRA A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 2,071 | +2,071 | — |
| BUNCE JOHN L JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 2,071 | +2,071 | — |
| Triplett Neal F | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 2,071 | +2,071 | — |
| MOCZARSKI ALEXANDER S | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 2,071 | +2,071 | — |
| Posner Brian S | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 2,071 | +2,071 | — |
| PASQUESI JOHN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 2,071 | +2,071 | — |
| PASQUESI JOHN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 1,858 | +1,858 | — |
| Houston Daniel Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 1,327 | +1,327 | — |
| BUNCE JOHN L JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 1,327 | +1,327 | — |
| Goodman Laurie | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 2,071 | +2,071 | — |
| Ebong Francis | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 2,071 | +2,071 | — |
| Houston Daniel Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 2,071 | +2,071 | — |
| KILCOYNE MOIRA A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 1,327 | +1,327 | — |
| PASQUESI JOHN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 1,327 | +1,327 | — |
| MALLESCH EILEEN A | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 2,071 | +2,071 | — |
| Triplett Neal F | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 1,327 | +1,327 | — |
| Houston Daniel Joseph | Open Market Purchase | 30.4.2026 | 5,300 | +5,300 | $94.09 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
46,944 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 139,689 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
35.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 40.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology