Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$1.07
▲ $0.01 (+0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/18 11:50 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$13.94M
Day Range
$1.06 - $1.10
52-Week Range
$1.02 - $1.88
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
DLPN is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-15.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 77.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -0.1% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
77/100
Similarity
6
Historical Matches
68/100
Analog Quality
-18.3%
Median 40D Outcome
68/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
0%
— … —
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
100%
-12.0% … -5.1%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 6 similar historical cases for this stock, 0% (95% CI 0%–39%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -7.6%.
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 67% (30%–90%) | +1.8% | -7.4% … +2.0% | -0.9% |
| 10D | 17% (3%–56%) | -3.4% | -8.1% … -0.2% | -2.6% |
| 20D | 0% (0%–39%) | -7.6% | -12.0% … -5.1% | -5.5% |
| 40D | 0% (0%–39%) | -18.3% | -19.6% … -10.7% | -13.2% |
| 60D | 0% (0%–39%) | -23.2% | -24.3% … -12.4% | -23.8% |
Sample size: 6 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-01 | 77/100 | Consolidation | -7.2% | -23.0% |
| 2026-04-28 | 72/100 | Downtrend | -13.4% | -24.6% |
| 2026-05-13 | 69/100 | Downtrend | -21.3% | -23.4% |
| 2026-06-22 | 65/100 | Downtrend | -4.3% | -7.8% |
| 2026-03-12 | 63/100 | High Volatility | -1.9% | -28.2% |
| 2026-06-01 | 56/100 | High Volatility | -8.0% | -8.8% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLY (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
16
Risk
32
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
17
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Dolphin Entertainment’s recent coverage centers on its Q2 2026 financial performance, highlighted by earnings reports and an 11% upside forecast from GF Value, alongside an upcoming earnings call. The company also emphasizes growth, with its Digital Dept adding 130 creators (a 45% team increase) and entering two new markets, while subsidiaries launch exclusive creator platforms at LTK Con and drive high‑profile campaigns at San Diego Comic‑Con. Additional news notes PR wins for Kewpie, a J‑Pop fragrance collaboration via Shore Fire Media, and a celebration of Angélique Kidjo’s historic Hollywood Walk of Fame star.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Dolphin Entertainment, Inc.. News trend score: 68. Reason: 4 of the last 19 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
21
Fundamentals
17
Technical
16
Valuation
50
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
42
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
-1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests moderate optimism reflected in the FOMO score, while anchoring near resistance is evident. Overconfidence appears modest given price outperformance versus modest EPS growth. The narrative gap of 4 points indicates stories are slightly ahead of realized fundamentals. A key open question is whether the stock can break above resistance to sustain the current momentum.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:10 AM
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 91/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on documented principles, Mackay’s model gives DLPN a high score (91) and flags no crowd‑mania, indicating the stock appears rational and free of speculative excess. Growth‑oriented analysts such as Lynch (80) and Veblen (74) view the company as a growth candidate whose price has not yet caught up to fundamentals, while more conservative value investors like Graham (62) and his enterprising variant (24) find the stock mixed and not cheap enough. Risk‑aware frameworks from Marks (71) and the market‑cycle version (63) place the stock near the middle of the cycle with reasonable risk pricing, whereas trend‑focused observers such as Livermore (35) and Nelson (19) warn of negative momentum and an overbought cycle. Liquidity and capital‑preservation gauges from Bagehot (31), Loeb (33) and Schwager (31) add additional red flags, creating a split conclusion between the relatively favorable growth/value signals and the cautionary risk/technical warnings.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 91
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 80
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 74
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 64
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 60
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 58
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 43
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 29
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
5.3%
Operating Margin
-0.1%
Net Margin
-5.4%
EBITDA Margin
4.1%
ROE
-31.9%
ROA
-5.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.27
Cash
$8.76M
Total Debt
$1.81M
Current Ratio
0.84
Debt/Equity
0.19
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$0.84
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$1.71
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 14 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 19 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 2.9.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 25.8.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 19.8.2026
Moby · 13.8.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 12.8.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 12.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 11.8.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 6.8.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 4.8.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 28.7.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 21.7.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 13.7.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 8.7.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 1.7.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 22.6.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 16.6.2026
Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. (DLPN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 40/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DLPN currently scores 40/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
DLPN's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 77.9%; Net income growth: 75.5%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -0.1% (negative); Net margin: -5.4% (negative); ATR: 5.7% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DLPN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 25 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 8.9.2026 | 4,100 | +4,100 | $1.19 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 4,100 | +4,100 | $1.15 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 538,990 | +4,100 | $1.14 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 4,100 | +4,100 | $1.14 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 17.8.2026 | 4,100 | +4,100 | $1.20 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 530,790 | +4,400 | $1.10 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 4,400 | +4,400 | $1.10 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 3.8.2026 | 526,390 | +4,600 | $1.07 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 3.8.2026 | 4,600 | +4,600 | $1.07 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 27.7.2026 | 521,790 | +4,400 | $1.11 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 27.7.2026 | 4,400 | +4,400 | $1.11 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 20.7.2026 | 517,390 | +4,400 | $1.12 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 20.7.2026 | 4,400 | +4,400 | $1.12 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 13.7.2026 | 512,990 | +4,450 | $1.11 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 13.7.2026 | 4,450 | +4,450 | $1.11 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 6.7.2026 | 508,540 | +4,300 | $1.16 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 6.7.2026 | 4,300 | +4,300 | $1.16 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 29.6.2026 | 4,200 | +4,200 | $1.18 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 22.6.2026 | 500,040 | +4,100 | $1.19 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 22.6.2026 | 4,100 | +4,100 | $1.19 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 15.6.2026 | 495,940 | +4,000 | $1.21 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 15.6.2026 | 4,000 | +4,000 | $1.21 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 8.6.2026 | 491,940 | +4,100 | $1.17 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 8.6.2026 | 4,100 | +4,100 | $1.17 |
| O'Dowd William IV | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 487,840 | +3,900 | $1.25 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
32,547 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 13,648 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
35.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology