Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$18.11
▼ $1.16 (-6.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:27 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$17.83 - $19.16
52-Week Range
$9.25 - $63.56
Beta
—
Next Earnings
17.11.2026
Support
$11.78
Resistance
$20.16
ODD is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-71.1% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 8/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 7.9% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
The overall investor score of 77 reflects a blend of solid technical momentum, highly favorable news sentiment, and notable risk considerations. Technically, the price sits above the 50‑day moving average and the SAR level, indicating an uptrend, while the MACD histogram is positive and RSI is at a healthy 67.4, both signaling strong bullish momentum; however, the price remains below the 200‑day average, tempering the outlook. News sentiment is exceptionally positive, with a perfect score of 100 driven by multiple analyst upgrades and a turnaround narrative that adds confidence to the outlook. Conversely, the risk score is low at 34, highlighted by an ATR representing 8.2% of price and a Kelmar metric of –0.25, suggesting high historical volatility and a steep potential drawdown of 87.3%. The combination of robust technical signals and optimistic analyst coverage lifts the composite score, while the elevated volatility and long‑term downside risk keep it from reaching a higher tier. This balanced picture explains why the stock earns a "STRONG" rating despite the underlying risk flags.
Price is above the 50‑day average and SAR, with a positive MACD histogram, RSI 67.4, and neutral %K, but it stays below the 200‑day average.
These indicators together gauge trend direction and momentum, key drivers of short‑term price behavior.
All five news items are positive or neutral, including analyst upgrades and a turnaround narrative.
Analyst sentiment can influence investor expectations and price target adjustments.
ATR equals 8.2% of price and Kelmar is –0.25, indicating high volatility and a potential 87.3% maximum drawdown.
High volatility and drawdown risk increase the chance of significant price swings.
StockIQ conclusion
The stock's 77 score stems from strong technical momentum and overwhelmingly positive analyst coverage, tempered by elevated volatility and a price position below the long‑term moving average. While current indicators support a robust outlook, risk factors and the need for more fundamental data suggest a cautious optimism.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
74
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $18.38
Evidence: -4.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $18.38
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 56)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $19.27
Evidence: +7.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $19.27
Evidence: +8.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $19.27
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $18.14
Evidence: 2.5x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $18.14
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $17.95
Evidence: -4.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $17.95
Evidence: 2.5x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $17.95
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $18.82
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 56)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $16.01
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 13 to 38 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
10d ago · $16.48
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -12 to 13 day-over-day
What happened after
10d ago · $16.48
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 10 to 74 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 11, 2026
Then
77
$16.01
Now
74
$18.11
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
75
Risk
34
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of ODDITY Tech Ltd. centers on a steep 25% drop in Q2 revenue to about $181 million and a plunge in non‑GAAP adjusted EBITDA, prompting discussion of an IL MAKIAGE advertising fix and the company’s broader turnaround prospects. Analysts have responded positively, revising earnings estimates upward and raising price targets (Morgan Stanley to $16.5, Truist to $18, Evercore ISI to $21), while notes highlight discounted convertible bonds and a potentially “nice, growing” revenue base.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about ODDITY Tech Ltd.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
52
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
—
Technical
75
Valuation
—
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+39%
Market Narrative
84
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+34
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior in ODD suggests traders are aligning with peer group movements rather than independent analysis. The stock’s modest outperformance relative to peers (-2.7% vs. -3.7%) may reflect a cautious but coordinated shift, possibly due to sector-wide trends or index tracking. Low FOMO and absence of euphoria indicate limited speculative enthusiasm, while anchoring near support (14.3%) hints at lingering caution. The key question remains whether this herding is a tactical adjustment or a longer-term trend, given the narrative-reality gap (-12) may signal misaligned expectations.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:48 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Goldman Sachs Downgrades ODDITY Tech to Sell From Neutral, Adjusts Price Target to $8 From $16"
"Oddity Tech (ODD) Is Down 18.7% After Weak Q1 Results And Steep Q2 Revenue Guidance Cut"
"Oddity Tech (ODD) Stock Fair Value Moves Lower After Q1 Sparks Analyst Cuts"
"Oddity Tech Unit to Repurchase $50 Million of Exchangeable Senior Notes"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Howard Marks (Market Cycle) — 64/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some models seeing cautious opportunity while others flag it as high-risk or volatile. Charles Mackay and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) score it highly, suggesting it lacks crowd-driven mania or cycle-driven overextension—implying a relatively stable, mid-cycle environment. However, other fundamentalists like Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, and Peter Lynch can’t yet form a clear view due to insufficient data, leaving their verdicts neutral. Meanwhile, contrarian voices like Jesse Livermore and Gerald Loeb paint a starkly negative picture, with Livermore’s model rejecting the trend and Loeb’s flagging unacceptable risk, while Veblen’s score hints at speculative, growth-chasing behavior. Even passive investors like Malkiel/Bogle and Morgan Housel dismiss it—one for its lack of efficiency edge, the other for its volatility, which could erode patience. The contrast underscores whether the stock’s ambiguity is a missed opportunity or a red flag, depending on the investor’s framework.
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 48
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 20
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Insider Monkey · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Motley Fool · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Motley Fool · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 9.9.2026
ChartMill · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Moby · 9.9.2026
ChartMill · 9.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for ODDITY Tech Ltd. (ODD) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for ODD specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
ODD's technical score is 75/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; RSI 61.0 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 7.9% of price; Calmar: -0.20 (3y annualized return -17.5% / max drawdown 87.3%); Price is below the 200-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ODD.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 809 | -809 | $15.01 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 809 | +809 | $9.39 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 809 | -809 | — |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 7,717 | -7,717 | — |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 7,717 | +7,717 | $9.39 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 7,717 | -7,717 | $15.09 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 128,421 | +23,929 | — |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 717,877 | -23,929 | — |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 116,135 | -12,286 | $14.27 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 23,929 | +23,929 | — |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 12,286 | -12,286 | $14.27 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 23,929 | -23,929 | — |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 104,492 | -21,571 | $15.14 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 296,273 | -21,571 | — |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 126,063 | +21,571 | $9.39 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 21,571 | -21,571 | $15.14 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 21,571 | +21,571 | $9.39 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 21,571 | -21,571 | — |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 104,492 | -5,503 | $15.00 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 317,844 | -5,503 | — |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 109,995 | +5,503 | $9.39 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 5,503 | -5,503 | $15.00 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 5,503 | +5,503 | $9.39 |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 5,503 | -5,503 | — |
| Drucker Mann Lindsay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 323,347 | -3,493 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,836,255 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,998,488 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology