Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$12.26
▲ $0.13 (+1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 11:41 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$824.78M
Day Range
$12.00 - $12.32
52-Week Range
$5.44 - $14.59
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$8.42
Resistance
$13.60
+94.6% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 8/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 5.0% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Obsidian Energy (OBE) demonstrates a robust overall investor score of 85, driven primarily by strong technical indicators and favorable news sentiment, though tempered by notable risk factors. The technical category achieves a near-perfect score of 95, reflecting a clear bullish trend: the stock price remains above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with the 50-day SMA recently crossing above the 200-day SMA—a classic bullish signal. The MACD histogram confirms upward momentum, while an RSI of 59.2 indicates healthy positive momentum without overbought conditions. News sentiment aligns positively, with recent earnings beats, analyst optimism, and strategic financing announcements reinforcing investor confidence. However, the risk category scores poorly at 34, highlighting volatility concerns: the ATR of 4.7% suggests moderate price swings, and the high Sharpe ratio (0.30) paired with a 56.4% maximum drawdown over three years—despite a 17.1% annualized return—signals significant volatility risk. This volatility could erode gains or trigger sharp corrections, particularly in a downturn or sector-specific downturn.
The stock exhibits a strong bullish technical setup, with the price above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a recent golden cross (SMA 50 > SMA 200), a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 59.2 indicating healthy upward momentum.
These technical signals collectively suggest a favorable short-to-medium-term trend, reinforcing investor confidence in sustained upward movement.
Recent news includes positive analyst commentary, earnings beats, and strategic financing (e.g., C$75M senior notes offering), though some announcements are neutral in tone.
Positive news bolsters investor sentiment and validates the company’s operational and financial stability, while neutral announcements mitigate downside surprises.
The stock exhibits high volatility (ATR: 4.7%) and a historically volatile performance profile, with a Sharpe ratio of 0.30 and a maximum 56.4% drawdown over three years despite a 17.1% annualized return.
Such volatility introduces significant downside risk, particularly for investors sensitive to price swings or sector-specific shocks.
StockIQ conclusion
Obsidian Energy (OBE) presents a compelling case for investors prioritizing growth and momentum, backed by strong technicals and positive news sentiment. However, the stock’s high volatility and historical drawdowns introduce meaningful risk, particularly for risk-averse investors. The balance between upside potential and downside volatility will largely depend on sector performance and macroeconomic conditions, which remain uncertain. While the current data suggests a favorable short-term outlook, long-term investors should carefully weigh the volatility risk against potential rewards.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
77
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $12.20
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $12.20
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $12.14
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $12.14
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $12.14
Evidence: 1.7x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $12.70
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $12.70
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $12.70
Evidence: 1.7x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $12.45
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $12.79
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $12.79
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $12.97
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $12.97
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $12.97
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $12.97
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $12.74
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 60)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $12.74
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 28 to 55 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
10d ago · $12.16
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
10d ago · $12.16
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
12d ago · $11.82
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 5, 2026
Then
85
$11.82
Now
77
$12.26
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
79
Risk
34
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Obsidian Energy Ltd.** highlights its aggressive expansion and financial growth. The company announced a **$98 million acquisition** of Belly River light oil assets in early July, boosting its 2026 production guidance. Later that month, it secured a **$75 million add-on to its senior unsecured notes**, raising capital for further investments. Q2 2026 results showed **beating net income estimates**, while a **50% increase in CapEx** to $300–$325 million signaled confidence in future growth. Analysts view these moves as bullish for the stock.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Obsidian Energy Ltd.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 7 of the last 15 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
39
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
—
Technical
79
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+33%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
OBE’s psychology score (31) reflects a dominant *anchoring* bias, where traders may cling to resistance at 3.4% above current levels. The narrative gap (7) hints at a disconnect between optimistic sentiment (86/100) and technical weakness (negative ROC, neutral RSI). Euphoria (24) persists despite weak momentum, possibly due to positive news, while FOMO (23) remains muted by lack of volume spikes. The key question: will traders break resistance or double down on anchoring? The absence of panic or herding suggests caution, not urgency.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 08:42 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Obsidian Energy's increased CapEx by nearly 50% to $300–$325 million signals management’s bullish outlook"
"Obsidian Energy Closes Acquisition of Belly River Light Oil Assets for $98 Million"
"Obsidian Energy Q2 Net Income Beats Estimates"
"Obsidian Energy Completes C$75 Million Senior Notes Offering"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 52/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each investor, the model estimates that the more momentum‑oriented or macro‑cycle thinkers such as Livermore, Malkiel & Bogle, Schwager and Nelson assign modestly positive scores (59‑51) and describe the situation as lacking a clear trend or edge, reflecting their reliance on observable price patterns and cycle positioning. In contrast, value‑focused and risk‑averse frameworks like Marks (both cycle and general), Loeb, Veblen and Smith produce markedly lower scores (35‑15) and flag the stock for late‑cycle risk, valuation concerns, or growth‑for‑its‑own‑sake, highlighting their sensitivity to perceived overvaluation and capital protection. Several classic fundamentals‑driven approaches (Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot and Graham‑Enterprising) default to a neutral 50, noting insufficient balance‑sheet, valuation or growth data, which underscores their need for detailed financial metrics before forming a view. The overall spread of scores therefore illustrates how differing methodological emphases—price action, market cycles, risk tolerance, and data requirements—lead to a consensus of uncertainty but varying degrees of caution.
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 60
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 52
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 51
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 44
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 40
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 22
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 8 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 15 articles.
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
TMX Newsfile · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
MT Newswires · 30.7.2026
TMX Newsfile · 30.7.2026
MT Newswires · 23.7.2026
TMX Newsfile · 22.7.2026
TMX Newsfile · 15.7.2026
MT Newswires · 2.7.2026
MT Newswires · 2.7.2026
TMX Newsfile · 2.7.2026
MT Newswires · 30.6.2026
CNW Group · 30.6.2026
TMX Newsfile · 23.6.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Obsidian Energy Ltd. (OBE) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for OBE specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
OBE's technical score is 79/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 56.6 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 5.0% of price; Calmar: 0.30 (3y annualized return 17.2% / max drawdown 56.4%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for OBE.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 20 sales out of the last 20 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 19.10.2016 | 1,190,600 | -1,190,600 | $1.80 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 17.10.2016 | 335,544 | -335,544 | $1.82 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 14.10.2016 | 1,044,900 | -1,044,900 | $1.90 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 13.10.2016 | 1,020,000 | -1,020,000 | $1.83 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 12.10.2016 | 825,500 | -825,500 | $1.87 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 11.10.2016 | 627,300 | -627,300 | $1.90 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 10.10.2016 | 446,800 | -446,800 | $1.91 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 7.10.2016 | 771,100 | -771,100 | $1.89 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 6.10.2016 | 1,140,000 | -1,140,000 | $1.92 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 5.10.2016 | 1,140,000 | -1,140,000 | $1.91 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 4.10.2016 | 690,000 | -690,000 | $1.85 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 3.10.2016 | 746,720 | -746,720 | $1.84 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 30.9.2016 | 955,100 | -955,100 | $1.82 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 29.9.2016 | 1,650,000 | -1,650,000 | $1.86 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 28.9.2016 | 1,560,000 | -1,560,000 | $1.82 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 26.9.2016 | 131,500 | -131,500 | $1.80 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 23.9.2016 | 325,300 | -325,300 | $1.83 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 22.9.2016 | 720,000 | -720,000 | $1.85 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 21.9.2016 | 696,000 | -696,000 | $1.81 |
| Ho Cheuk Fund | Open Market Sale | 20.9.2016 | 595,900 | -595,900 | $1.81 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,376,006 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 7,658,521 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology