Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$337.82
▼ $18.67 (-5.2%)
Market data updated: 09/19 09:07 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$336.71 - $361.00
52-Week Range
$152.21 - $458.25
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$302.17
Resistance
$458.25
+48.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $516.04 vs. price $337.82 (+52.8%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 6.4% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
76/100
Similarity
7
Historical Matches
71/100
Analog Quality
+35.5%
Median 40D Outcome
0/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
86%
+23.7% … +46.9%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
14%
-12.9% … -12.9%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 7 similar historical cases for this stock, 86% (95% CI 49%–97%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +38.3%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 57% (25%–84%) | +1.6% | -2.3% … +15.5% | +1.4% |
| 10D | 71% (36%–92%) | +12.0% | -1.6% … +22.0% | +5.3% |
| 20D | 86% (49%–97%) | +38.3% | +11.7% … +45.2% | +9.8% |
| 40D | 100% (65%–100%) | +35.5% | +24.0% … +54.0% | +20.4% |
| 60D | 100% (65%–100%) | +31.9% | +27.8% … +67.6% | +40.2% |
Sample size: 7 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 76/100 | High Volatility | +18.9% | +28.6% |
| 2026-03-26 | 68/100 | High Volatility | +53.3% | +77.5% |
| 2026-04-10 | 66/100 | ✓ High Volatility | +38.3% | +102.5% |
| 2026-06-05 | 63/100 | High Volatility | +48.7% | +31.9% |
| 2026-03-12 | 52/100 | ✓ High Volatility | -12.9% | +27.0% |
| 2026-04-29 | 46/100 | High Volatility | +4.5% | +57.7% |
| 2026-06-22 | 44/100 | High Volatility | +41.7% | +18.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity.
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
55
Value
62
Momentum
33
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
73
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Dave Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 16 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
33
Fundamentals
73
Technical
33
Valuation
62
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+7%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Philip Fisher — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Howard Marks (Market Cycle) — 29/100
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 72
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 70
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 60
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 59
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 56
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
35.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
55.5%
ROA
40.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$14.65
Cash
$80.52M
Total Debt
$0
Current Ratio
3.83
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$337.82
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$516.04
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+52.8%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $362.13M | $332.23M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $432.30M | $363.85M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $491.74M | $379.71M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $531.69M | $376.66M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $544.98M | $354.20M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$289.71M
Terminal Value
$8.59B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.59B
Enterprise Value
$7.39B
Net Debt
$-80.52M
Equity Value
$7.47B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$24.36
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$23.41
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 5 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 16 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 24.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.7.2026
Benzinga · 23.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.7.2026
Dave Inc. (DAVE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DAVE currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DAVE's estimated fair value is $516.04, which is 52.8% above the current price of $337.82. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DAVE's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $516.04 vs. price $337.82 (+52.8%); Revenue growth (last year): 59.7%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 222.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 6.4% of price; Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DAVE.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 11 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rozov Yadin | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 0 | -2,200 | — |
| Preston Dan | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 5,191 | -275 | $259.83 |
| Preston Dan | Open Market Sale | 4.6.2026 | 5,466 | -275 | $247.65 |
| Wilk Jason | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 299,950 | -8,290 | $275.01 |
| POPE MICHAEL W | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 6,468 | +637 | — |
| Wilk Jason | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 308,344 | -80 | $277.49 |
| Beilman Kyle | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 200,228 | -49 | $277.23 |
| Preston Dan | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 5,741 | +637 | — |
| Beilman Kyle | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 196,155 | -4,073 | $275.00 |
| Wilk Jason | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 308,240 | -104 | $276.55 |
| Rozov Yadin | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 75,834 | +637 | — |
| Carroll Brendan | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 2,271 | +637 | — |
| Khajehnouri Nima | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 637 | +637 | — |
| Beilman Kyle | Other Transaction | 29.5.2026 | 25,650 | +25,650 | — |
| Beilman Kyle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 18.3.2026 | 200,277 | -3,261 | $206.09 |
| Wilk Jason | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 308,424 | +18,335 | — |
| Beilman Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 163,816 | +8,260 | — |
| Wilk Jason | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 217,550 | +13,767 | — |
| Wilk Jason | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 290,089 | +72,539 | — |
| Beilman Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 194,040 | +30,224 | — |
| Beilman Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 203,538 | +9,498 | — |
| Mitchell Andrea | Open Market Sale | 6.3.2026 | 20,506 | -803 | $206.26 |
| Mitchell Andrea | Open Market Sale | 6.3.2026 | 21,309 | -200 | $204.86 |
| Mitchell Andrea | Open Market Sale | 6.3.2026 | 19,094 | -1,412 | $207.51 |
| Mitchell Andrea | Open Market Sale | 6.3.2026 | 15,154 | -2,158 | $209.34 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,415,526 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,314,382 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
72.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 75.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology