Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$73.22
▼ $0.03 (-0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/17 06:43 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$31.15B
Day Range
$72.92 - $74.85
52-Week Range
$69.72 - $100.50
Beta
—
Next Earnings
20.10.2026
CCI is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-21.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 111.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.26
Risk
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (60/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
77/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
-4.4%
Median 40D Outcome
65/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
40%
+2.3% … +5.3%
🟡 Base
20%
-0.8% … -0.5%
🔴 Bearish
40%
-11.0% … -6.7%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 40% (95% CI 20%–64%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -0.7%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
9 occurrence(s) · 44% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.6% | -3.4% … +2.5% | +0.0% |
| 10D | 27% (11%–52%) | -3.3% | -5.4% … +1.8% | +0.1% |
| 20D | 40% (20%–64%) | -0.7% | -7.9% … +2.4% | -0.1% |
| 40D | 33% (15%–58%) | -4.4% | -10.8% … +2.0% | -0.6% |
| 60D | 27% (11%–52%) | -7.0% | -13.7% … +1.3% | -0.2% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-16 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +7.8% | -1.7% |
| 2020-09-24 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -0.7% | -2.3% |
| 2026-03-18 | 75/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +2.3% | +8.5% |
| 2022-09-06 | 73/100 | Downtrend | -11.2% | -16.4% |
| 2020-09-08 | 73/100 | Consolidation | +4.2% | +5.3% |
| 2018-10-12 | 73/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +5.6% | +1.8% |
| 2025-12-23 | 73/100 | Downtrend | -0.9% | -7.0% |
| 2023-06-26 | 73/100 | Downtrend | -0.2% | -12.7% |
| 2025-10-28 | 72/100 | Downtrend | -5.5% | -7.8% |
| 2026-06-15 | 72/100 | Consolidation | -10.4% | -16.8% |
| 2023-04-21 | 72/100 | Downtrend | -10.2% | -9.9% |
| 2022-09-20 | 71/100 | Downtrend | -17.3% | -14.8% |
| 2026-01-22 | 70/100 | Downtrend | +2.1% | +1.6% |
| 2025-12-05 | 70/100 | Downtrend | -2.4% | +0.9% |
| 2026-05-15 | 69/100 | Consolidation | +2.4% | -14.6% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLRE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 22, 2026
Then
55
$75.51
Now
43
$73.22
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
19
Risk
40
Sentiment
38
Fundamental
53
Institutional
40
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING CCI...
Recent media coverage of Crown Castle has primarily focused on the broader challenges facing cell tower REITs (real estate investment trusts), including **declining stock valuations** and **dividend scrutiny**. Analysts highlight Crown Castle’s **raised guidance and recent dividend payments**, though payout sustainability remains debated. The sector faces **satellite competition** (e.g., SpaceX, AST SpaceMobile) and **lower earnings multiples**, with investors weighing long-term growth against near-term risks. Market trends also emphasize macroeconomic pressures like rising yields and inflation.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Crown Castle. News trend score: 38. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 7 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
48
Fundamentals
53
Technical
19
Valuation
45
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
-11%
Market Narrative
35
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
-7
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant psychological state here is **Loss Aversion**, driven by a steep 3-month decline and elevated trading volume. Investors appear cautious, possibly resisting further downside or hesitating to exit positions. The narrative gap (-4) suggests a slight disconnect between market sentiment and fundamentals, but no extreme bias is evident. The key question is whether the recent volume spike reflects defensive positioning or a strategic rebalancing ahead of potential catalysts. The absence of panic or euphoria signals stability, though the low FOMO score hints at limited enthusiasm for upside bets.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:23 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"high capital costs and physics limits favor tower REITs like Crown Castle and American Tower over urban disruption fears"
"the coverage math behind those payouts tells a story that should make income investors look twice before treating them as equals"
"mixed U.S. stocks after Warsh’s hawkish Jackson Hole remarks lifted yields; REITs lagged"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for CCI reflects a clash between growth-oriented and defensive investment philosophies. High scorers like Charles Mackay (95) and Peter Lynch (77) see potential in the stock’s fundamentals—Lynch highlights underappreciated growth, while Mackay dismisses crowd-driven hype. Meanwhile, value-focused methodologies like Benjamin Graham (27) and Walter Bagehot (25) reject it outright, citing weak defensive metrics and liquidity risks. Even moderate-risk approaches like Gerald Loeb (49) and Samuel Nelson (46) remain cautious, suggesting mid-cycle uncertainty. The contrast underscores how growth hunters and contrarians would debate whether CCI’s momentum justifies the risk, while traditional value investors see no margin of safety.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 89
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 78
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 66
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 61
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 34
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 27
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 25
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 21
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 8 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
97.3%
Operating Margin
48.7%
Net Margin
10.4%
EBITDA Margin
64.8%
ROE
-27.2%
ROA
1.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.02
Cash
$99.00M
Total Debt
$27.12B
Current Ratio
0.26
Debt/Equity
-16.59
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $1.063 |
| 14.6.2026 | $1.063 |
| 13.3.2026 | $1.063 |
| 12.3.2026 | $1.063 |
| 15.12.2025 | $1.063 |
| 14.12.2025 | $1.063 |
| 15.9.2025 | $1.063 |
| 14.9.2025 | $1.063 |
| 13.6.2025 | $1.063 |
| 12.6.2025 | $1.063 |
| 14.3.2025 | $1.565 |
| 13.3.2025 | $1.565 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
-$3.74
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$17.44
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 4 neutral, 9 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Fintel · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Barchart · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Crown Castle (CCI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CCI currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CCI's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 111.2%; Net income growth: 111.4%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.26; Calmar: -0.23 (3y annualized return -9.1% / max drawdown 39.1%); Return on equity (ROE): -27.2% (negative).
Yes — CCI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collins Robert Sean | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $75.89 |
| Hinson Kristoffer L | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 11,083 | +11,083 | — |
| Hinson Kristoffer L | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 11,083 | +11,083 | — |
| Stephens Kevin A | Open Market Purchase | 5.5.2026 | 820 | +820 | $90.24 |
| Stephens Kevin A | Open Market Purchase | 5.5.2026 | 23,934 | +820 | $90.24 |
| Collins Robert Sean | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 1,138 | +1,138 | — |
| Adams Edward B JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 14,490 | +14,490 | — |
| Adams Edward B JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 5,702 | -5,702 | $88.78 |
| Piche Catherine | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 2,186 | -2,186 | $88.78 |
| Collins Robert Sean | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 325 | -325 | $88.78 |
| Piche Catherine | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 5,031 | +5,031 | — |
| Collins Robert Sean | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 6,938 | +1,138 | — |
| Collins Robert Sean | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 6,613 | -325 | $88.78 |
| Piche Catherine | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 22,691 | +5,031 | — |
| Piche Catherine | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 20,505 | -2,186 | $88.78 |
| Adams Edward B JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 39,673 | +14,490 | — |
| Adams Edward B JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 33,971 | -5,702 | $88.78 |
| PATEL SUNIT S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.4.2026 | 9,649 | -9,649 | — |
| PATEL SUNIT S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.4.2026 | 9,649 | +9,649 | — |
| PATEL SUNIT S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.4.2026 | 3,797 | -3,797 | $86.57 |
| PATEL SUNIT S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.4.2026 | 16,847 | +9,649 | — |
| PATEL SUNIT S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.4.2026 | 13,050 | -3,797 | $86.57 |
| PATEL SUNIT S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.4.2026 | 19,303 | -9,649 | — |
| Collins Robert Sean | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $87.49 |
| Collins Robert Sean | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 5,800 | -3,000 | $87.49 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
9,720,564 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 12,278,916 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
30.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 36.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology