Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$11.64
▼ $0.10 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/28 09:40 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/28/2026
News analyzed: 09/28/2026
Market Cap
$635.02M
Day Range
$11.53 - $11.75
52-Week Range
$11.53 - $16.36
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$11.53
Resistance
$13.37
-24.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 2/17 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.8% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.26 (3y annualized return -8.9% / max drawdown 34.7%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
37
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
38
Quality
No data available
Value
55
Momentum
9
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
48
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of SLR Investment Corp., a closed-end fund, has focused on its declining net asset value (NAV) and underperformance, with the stock trading at a 27% discount to NAV, deeper than historical averages. The company reported missed earnings and revenue estimates in Q2 2026, with net investment income of $0.33 per share, amid challenges in its direct-lending business. Analysts like B. Riley downgraded the stock to Neutral from Buy, citing ongoing struggles, while the company maintained its dividend coverage at $0.31 per share. Executives emphasized a focus on specialty finance lending despite a tougher lending environment.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SLR Investment Corp. - Closed End Fund. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 4 vs. 4 out of the last 18 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
81
Fundamentals
48
Technical
9
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
38
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
SLRC’s psychology score (68) is dominated by anchoring, where traders may be fixated on the 1.6% distance from support, ignoring broader negative momentum (-1.3% ROC) and neutral sentiment (44/100). The narrative gap (-10) hints at a disconnect between market perception (40) and reality (50), possibly reinforcing anchoring. Herding (47) suggests cautious underperformance awareness, but no panic or FOMO signals emerge. The key question: *Will traders break free from support fixation, or will the 1.6% proximity reinforce holding?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:13 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"delivered earnings and revenue surprises of -2.94% and -0.43% (Yahoo, #9)"
"trades at a 27% discount to NAV, deeper than its historical average (SeekingAlpha, #2)"
"dividend remains covered at $0.31/share (ChartMill, #8)"
"more challenging direct-lending environment (Yahoo, #3)"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for SLRC reflects deep methodological differences between value, growth, and cyclical investors. Benjamin Graham and his variants—both conservative and enterprising—struggle due to insufficient balance-sheet or valuation data, leaving them unable to form a definitive opinion. Meanwhile, Thorstein Veblen and Howard Marks (both in his general and cycle-focused approaches) see potential, with Veblen praising real value alignment and Marks noting reasonable risk pricing, suggesting a more nuanced, growth-oriented or cyclical perspective. In contrast, Jesse Livermore’s low score and harsh verdict—rooted in his trend-following dogma—stands out as an outlier, while Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher’s zero or neutral scores stem from a lack of growth or fundamental data, reinforcing the stock’s ambiguity for classic growth or quality investors. The middle ground, represented by Nelson, Housel, and Loeb, offers cautious optimism, balancing cyclical positioning and risk tolerance, while efficient-market theorists and Schwager remain skeptical, questioning the stock’s edge over passive strategies.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 94
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 85
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 77
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 74
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 73
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 61
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 61
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 24
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 0
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
—
ROA
3.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.70
Cash
$364.30M
Total Debt
$1.15B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.9.2026 | $0.310 |
| 12.6.2026 | $0.310 |
| 11.6.2026 | $0.310 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.410 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.410 |
| 12.12.2025 | $0.410 |
| 11.12.2025 | $0.410 |
| 12.9.2025 | $0.410 |
| 11.9.2025 | $0.410 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.410 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.410 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.410 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 10 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 18 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 22.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
MarketBeat · 5.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
Moby · 5.8.2026
ChartMill · 5.8.2026
Yahoo · 4.8.2026
Yahoo · 4.8.2026
Zacks · 4.8.2026
Associated Press · 4.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 4.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 1.7.2026
SLR Investment Corp. - Closed End Fund (SLRC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 37/100, rated "Weak" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SLRC currently scores 37/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SLRC's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.8% of price; P/E: 6.8.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.26 (3y annualized return -8.9% / max drawdown 34.7%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -3.4%; Net income growth: -3.4%.
Yes — SLRC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 9 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Open Market Purchase | 10.9.2026 | 4,065,153 | +20,000 | $12.35 |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Open Market Purchase | 13.5.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $13.10 |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Open Market Purchase | 13.5.2026 | 4,045,153 | +10,000 | $13.10 |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Open Market Purchase | 12.5.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $13.09 |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Open Market Purchase | 12.5.2026 | 4,035,153 | +10,000 | $13.09 |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Open Market Purchase | 16.3.2026 | 10,452 | +10,452 | $13.90 |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Open Market Purchase | 16.3.2026 | 4,025,153 | +10,452 | $13.90 |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.3.2026 | 466,378.429 | -466,378.429 | — |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.3.2026 | 354,511.383 | +354,511.383 | — |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | E | 13.3.2026 | 10,986.597 | -10,986.597 | — |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.3.2026 | 354,511.383 | -354,511.383 | — |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.3.2026 | 354,511.383 | -354,511.383 | — |
| SPOHLER BRUCE J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.3.2026 | 354,511.383 | -354,511.383 | — |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Open Market Purchase | 13.3.2026 | 25,000 | +25,000 | $13.91 |
| SPOHLER BRUCE J | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.3.2026 | 466,378.429 | -466,378.429 | — |
| Kajee Shiraz | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.3.2026 | 5,782.285 | +5,782.285 | — |
| Kajee Shiraz | Disposition to the Company | 13.3.2026 | 5,782.285 | -5,782.285 | — |
| SPOHLER BRUCE J | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.3.2026 | 354,511.383 | +354,511.383 | — |
| Kajee Shiraz | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.3.2026 | 13,899.643 | +13,899.643 | — |
| Kajee Shiraz | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.3.2026 | 5,782.285 | -5,782.285 | — |
| SPOHLER BRUCE J | E | 13.3.2026 | 10,986.597 | -10,986.597 | — |
| SPOHLER BRUCE J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.3.2026 | 354,511.383 | -354,511.383 | — |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.3.2026 | 3,635,190 | -354,511 | — |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.3.2026 | 3,989,701 | +354,511 | — |
| GROSS MICHAEL S | Open Market Purchase | 13.3.2026 | 4,014,701 | +25,000 | $13.91 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,149,492 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,022,046 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 50.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology