Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$25.50
▼ $0.15 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/15 07:13 PM
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$25.45 - $25.70
52-Week Range
$20.91 - $26.56
Beta
—
Next Earnings
20.10.2026
+14.7% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 2/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.1% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
23
Risk
58
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
77
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Adams Diversified Equity Fund Inc.** (ADX) has primarily focused on its **high-yielding closed-end fund (CEF) strategy**, particularly its **8% annualized distribution** and strong **long-term capital gains backing** (91% of payouts). Analysts highlight ADX as a preferred **income play** in volatile markets, emphasizing its **actively managed large-cap equity focus**, **low leverage**, and **discount-to-NAV** appeal. Comparisons to other high-yield funds (e.g., PEO) and broader discussions on **diversified income portfolios** also feature prominently.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Adams Diversified Equity Fund Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
42
Fundamentals
—
Technical
23
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+2%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+9
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for ADX strongly suggests traders are anchored near a resistance level just 1.6% above current prices, likely due to its psychological weight. While FOMO and euphoria scores are present, they are muted by modest momentum and neutral RSI, indicating cautious optimism rather than reckless speculation. The narrative gap (7 points) hints at a disconnect between perceived fundamentals and market positioning, but anchoring dominates as the primary psychological state. The key question remains whether traders will break resistance or retreat, given the lack of extreme sentiment or volatility.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 12:04 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"ADX delivers an 8% annualized distribution from an actively managed large-cap equity portfolio"
"8% Payout Is Not What Worries Me — ADX 2024 managed-distribution policy"
"A SWAN income portfolio aims for consistent income, growth, and lower volatility through diversification"
"10%+ yields, 7.7% NAV discounts, diversification, and vetted picks"
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 26/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for ADX reflects deep methodological divides between growth-focused and value-oriented investors. Morgan Housel’s near-perfect score highlights his preference for quiet, compounding businesses—here, the stock’s steady fundamentals align with his patient, long-term approach. Meanwhile, Thorstein Veblen’s moderate approval suggests it meets his criteria for *real* value creation, though not with the same urgency as a Housel-style compounder. On the other end, technical and market-cycle analysts like Samuel Nelson and Jack Schwager dismiss it outright, with Nelson flagging overbought conditions and Schwager’s quantitative rigor finding no clear edge. Even value stalwarts like Gerald Loeb and Howard Marks (in his mixed verdict) temper their enthusiasm, wary of inflated expectations or insufficient data, while Grahamite methodologies uniformly lack the concrete metrics to form a definitive opinion. The divide underscores whether ADX’s appeal lies in its quiet growth (for Housel) or whether its risks—cyclicality, crowd sentiment, or valuation—make it a gamble for others.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 97
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 73
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 68
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 26
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$24.53
Range Bottom
$26.56
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 27.7.2026 | $0.500 |
| 26.7.2026 | $0.500 |
| 27.4.2026 | $0.480 |
| 26.4.2026 | $0.480 |
| 26.1.2026 | $0.470 |
| 25.1.2026 | $0.470 |
| 21.11.2025 | $0.460 |
| 20.11.2025 | $0.460 |
| 28.7.2025 | $0.460 |
| 27.7.2025 | $0.460 |
| 28.4.2025 | $0.460 |
| 27.4.2025 | $0.460 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 17.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 17.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Adams Diversified Equity Fund Inc. (ADX) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for ADX specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
ADX's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.1% of price; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -2.1% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — ADX has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 10 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerns Janis F. | Open Market Purchase | 2.2.2026 | 7 | +7 | $23.30 |
| Kerns Janis F. | Open Market Purchase | 2.2.2026 | 51,990 | +7 | $23.30 |
| Kerns Janis F. | Open Market Purchase | 30.1.2026 | 107 | +107 | $23.23 |
| Kerns Janis F. | Open Market Purchase | 30.1.2026 | 100 | +100 | $23.23 |
| Kerns Janis F. | Open Market Purchase | 30.1.2026 | 107 | +107 | $23.24 |
| Kerns Janis F. | Open Market Purchase | 30.1.2026 | 51,776 | +107 | $23.24 |
| Kerns Janis F. | Open Market Purchase | 30.1.2026 | 51,883 | +107 | $23.23 |
| Kerns Janis F. | Open Market Purchase | 30.1.2026 | 51,983 | +100 | $23.23 |
| Kerns Janis F. | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 51,669 | +6,822 | — |
| Hook Brian Stephen | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 45,659 | +1,757 | — |
| Hook Brian Stephen | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 45,783 | +124 | — |
| Haynie James P. | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 222,798 | +21,570 | — |
| Swindell Douglas Cotton | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 81,304 | +7,533 | — |
| Escherich Frederic A | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 52,512 | +0 | — |
| JAMMET MARY CHRIS | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 10,316 | +841 | — |
| Kloppenburg Lauriann C | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 16,324 | +1,333 | — |
| Nelson Jane Musser | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 6,026 | +487 | — |
| Dale Kenneth James | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.12.2025 | 26,623 | +1,072 | — |
| Dale Kenneth James | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 27,552 | +929 | — |
| Stoeckle Mark E. | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 80,231 | +0 | — |
| Nelson Jane Musser | Open Market Purchase | 31.10.2024 | 1,155 | +1,155 | $21.69 |
| Escherich Frederic A | Open Market Sale | 28.10.2024 | 9,500 | -9,500 | $21.93 |
| Escherich Frederic A | Open Market Sale | 25.10.2024 | 4,833 | -4,833 | $21.90 |
| Escherich Frederic A | Open Market Sale | 24.10.2024 | 11,110 | -11,110 | $21.65 |
| Nelson Jane Musser | Open Market Purchase | 27.1.2023 | 3,585 | +3,585 | $15.41 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,236,437 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,395,972 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology