Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$22.65
▼ $0.83 (-3.5%)
Market data updated: 09/25 03:52 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/25/2026
News analyzed: 09/25/2026
Market Cap
$8.50B
Day Range
$22.31 - $23.64
52-Week Range
$11.50 - $30.32
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$17.39
Resistance
$25.39
+35.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 71.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$59.77 vs. price $22.65 (-363.9%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
72
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
25
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) has centered on its stock volatility, shifting investor sentiment, and evolving business narratives. Headlines highlight concerns over a 36% decline in three months, debates on whether to hold or exit shares, and speculation about its future beyond Bitcoin mining. The company’s stock movements are tied to broader crypto market trends, AI-related funding hopes, and analyst valuations, with some betting on its potential transition into AI infrastructure. Recent discussions also emphasize billionaire investments in ex-Bitcoin miners, reinforcing uncertainty around its long-term strategy.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Riot Platforms, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
41
Fundamentals
25
Technical
72
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-21%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+31
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
RIOT’s psychology is dominated by Loss Aversion, consistent with a stock that has recently underperformed (-11.6% in 3 months) but lacks aggressive selling volume. The Overconfidence and Confirmation Bias scores suggest investors are selectively ignoring weak fundamentals (declining margins, stagnant revenue) while chasing momentum. The FOMO signal is muted by low volume (0.73x avg) and moderate RSI (57), indicating cautious participation rather than frenzy. The key question: *Will the narrative gap (+30) sustain participation despite deteriorating fundamentals, or will loss aversion trigger further hesitation?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:50 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Third Point built a four-stock basket of bitcoin miners positioned to benefit from the industry’s growing shift toward AI infrastructure."
"MARA and Riot Sink 6% While Bitcoin Holds Near $79,500"
"Riot Platforms (RIOT) Stock Looks Fully Priced Despite Recent Weakness"
"Billionaire hedge fund manager bets on ex-Bitcoin miners"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 73/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for RIOT reflects deep contrasts in how these methodologies weigh risk, valuation, and market psychology. At the optimistic end, Edgar Lawrence Smith and Charles Mackay see potential in a 'buy and hold' opportunity or a lack of crowd-driven mania, suggesting they prioritize long-term fundamentals or speculative calm. Meanwhile, the majority—including Fisher, Marks, and Graham—flag concerns like overvaluation, weak defensive metrics, or stretched cycles, signaling caution. The lowest scores, from Schwager and Veblen, dismiss the stock outright, either due to a lack of disciplined setups or a perception of growth-chasing without substance. This tension highlights whether RIOT’s volatility and speculative nature align with patient, value-driven strategies or if it’s better suited for those who tolerate risk for speculative upside.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 56
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 51
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 44
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 38
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 36
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 34
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 28
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 27
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 7
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 1 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-96.1%
Net Margin
-102.4%
EBITDA Margin
-43.1%
ROE
-23.2%
ROA
-16.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.95
Cash
$233.52M
Total Debt
$840.80M
Current Ratio
0.96
Debt/Equity
0.29
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$22.65
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$59.77
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-363.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-967.89M | $-887.97M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-1.16B | $-972.49M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-1.31B | $-1.01B |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-1.42B | $-1.01B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-1.46B | $-946.69M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-774.31M
Terminal Value
$-22.97B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-14.93B
Enterprise Value
$-19.76B
Net Debt
$607.28M
Equity Value
$-20.36B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$8.39
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.94
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 5 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
ChartMill · 21.9.2026
ChartMill · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
RIOT currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, RIOT's estimated fair value is -$59.77, which is 363.9% below the current price of $22.65. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
RIOT's technical score is 72/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 71.9%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.29.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$59.77 vs. price $22.65 (-363.9%); Operating margin: -96.1% (negative); Net margin: -102.4% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for RIOT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Howell Stephen Mitchell Jr. | Gift | 12.8.2026 | 21,198 | -21,198 | — |
| Howell Stephen Mitchell Jr. | Gift | 12.8.2026 | 1,834,408 | -21,198 | — |
| Werner Ryan D. | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 2,501 | -2,501 | $23.53 |
| Werner Ryan D. | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 35,430 | -35,430 | $21.98 |
| Werner Ryan D. | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 9,802 | -9,802 | $22.82 |
| Werner Ryan D. | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 699,493 | -2,501 | $23.53 |
| Werner Ryan D. | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 701,994 | -9,802 | $22.82 |
| Werner Ryan D. | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 711,796 | -35,430 | $21.98 |
| Werner Ryan D. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 148,500 | -148,500 | $20.17 |
| Les Jason | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 2,896,921 | -2,896,921 | $20.17 |
| Howell Stephen Mitchell Jr. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 153,162 | -153,162 | $20.17 |
| Les Jason | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 4,944,637 | -2,896,921 | $20.17 |
| Werner Ryan D. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 747,226 | -148,500 | $20.17 |
| Howell Stephen Mitchell Jr. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 1,855,606 | -153,162 | $20.17 |
| Werner Ryan D. | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 10,232 | -10,232 | $21.22 |
| Werner Ryan D. | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 7,596 | -7,596 | $21.93 |
| Werner Ryan D. | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 903,322 | -10,232 | $21.22 |
| Werner Ryan D. | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 895,726 | -7,596 | $21.93 |
| Mouton Douglas | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 8,347 | +8,347 | — |
| Les Jason | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 101,015 | -101,015 | $23.96 |
| Howell Stephen Mitchell Jr. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 21,966 | -21,966 | $23.96 |
| Turner Michael John | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 8,347 | +8,347 | — |
| Leverton Jaime | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 8,347 | +8,347 | — |
| Yee Colin M. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 41,071 | -41,071 | — |
| Yee Colin M. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 124,823 | +124,823 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
51,105,102 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 51,866,945 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
43.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology