Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$272.11
▲ $18.81 (+7.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:59 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$36.53B
Day Range
$257.62 - $272.87
52-Week Range
$79.76 - $355.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$204.37
Resistance
$329.00
SIMO is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+197.8% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 8/14 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 7.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
70
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $272.11
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 57)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $264.47
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 7 to 34 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $236.81
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 27 to -10 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $284.48
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 60)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 11, 2026
Then
78
$265.25
Now
70
$272.11
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
72
Risk
42
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation has centered on its progress with **EU Cyber Resilience Act compliance**, marking initial milestones in its compliance program. Analysts have also debated its stock valuation, with some suggesting it may be overvalued while others highlight its strong year-to-year performance (186% surge). The focus remains on regulatory readiness and market valuation amid broader semiconductor sector trends.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Silicon Motion Technology Corporation. News trend score: 80. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
50
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
96
Fundamentals
—
Technical
72
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-15%
Market Narrative
73
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+23
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for SIMO suggests a **FOMO-driven momentum trade** (24) with mild euphoria (18) as a secondary influence. Positive momentum, high sentiment, and a neutral RSI indicate traders may be chasing gains, while the lack of volatility or peer-group divergence rules out panic or herding. The narrative gap (15) hints at a disconnect between market enthusiasm and fundamentals, but the dominant FOMO signal suggests traders are prioritizing short-term price action over deeper analysis. The key question remains whether this momentum can sustain itself or if sentiment will reverse if the stock approaches resistance.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 10:08 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Silicon Motion Completes Initial Stage of EU Cyber Resilience Act Compliance Program"
"Silicon Motion Surges 186% in Past Year: Reason to Buy the Stock?"
"Silicon Motion (SIMO) Stock Could Be 47% Overvalued On EU Cyber Resilience Progress"
"Silicon Motion (NASDAQ:SIMO) Shows High Growth Momentum With a Breakout Setup"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 62/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on their documented principles, the model estimates that many classic investors—Smith, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot—cannot form a substantive view because dividend, balance‑sheet, or growth data are missing, leading to neutral 50‑point scores. Those who focus on market cycles or crowd sentiment, such as Nelson, Mackay, Marks‑cycle, and the efficient‑market viewpoint, assign modestly positive or mixed scores, suggesting the stock appears slightly oversold or shows early excitement. In contrast, traders who prioritize trend direction, risk, and valuation—Livermore, Marks, Loeb, Veblen, and Housel—give low scores, flagging negative momentum, heightened risk, or speculative growth as cautionary signals. The divergence therefore arises from each methodology’s weighting of different information: absent data yields neutrality, while cycle, risk, or crowd cues push the assessments toward either modest optimism or marked pessimism.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟢 67
A real, well-supported case — deviating from a broad index may be justified here
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 62
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 31
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 30
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 26
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 26
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 25
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 6.8.2026 | $0.500 |
| 7.5.2026 | $0.500 |
| 6.5.2026 | $0.500 |
| 11.2.2026 | $0.500 |
| 10.2.2026 | $0.500 |
| 14.11.2025 | $0.500 |
| 13.11.2025 | $0.500 |
| 7.8.2025 | $0.500 |
| 6.8.2025 | $0.500 |
| 8.5.2025 | $0.500 |
| 7.5.2025 | $0.500 |
| 13.2.2025 | $0.500 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 3 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Business Wire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for SIMO specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
SIMO's technical score is 72/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 7.1% of price; -17.4% over the last 3 months relative to the index; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — SIMO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 12 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHIEH HAN-PING | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $328.00 |
| LIN KUAN-MING | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $320.31 |
| LIN KUAN-MING | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 7,500 | -1,000 | $320.31 |
| SHIEH HAN-PING | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 6,656 | -1,000 | $328.00 |
| LIN KUAN-MING | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $300.00 |
| LIN KUAN-MING | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $310.01 |
| LIN KUAN-MING | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 9,500 | -1,000 | $300.00 |
| LIN KUAN-MING | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 8,500 | -1,000 | $310.01 |
| SHIEH HAN-PING | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $301.25 |
| SHIEH HAN-PING | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 7,656 | -1,000 | $301.25 |
| DUANN SHII TYNG | Open Market Sale | 6.5.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $245.00 |
| DUANN SHII TYNG | Open Market Sale | 6.5.2026 | 15,200 | -1,500 | $245.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,640,870 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 807,432 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology