Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$33.24
▲ $0.17 (+0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/29 10:43 PM
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
$60.47B
Day Range
$32.90 - $33.37
52-Week Range
$27.57 - $47.97
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$32.46
Resistance
$38.58
RELX is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-29.5% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 1/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Relative strength vs. S&P 500
+2.6% over the last 3 months relative to the index
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.00 (3y annualized return -0.1% / max drawdown 50.2%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
RELX demonstrates a balanced yet nuanced profile, with its investorScore of 77 and STRONG rating driven primarily by robust technical indicators and overwhelmingly positive news sentiment. The stock’s price sits comfortably above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, reinforcing a sustained uptrend, while the positive MACD histogram and price above SAR (Parabolic Stop and Reverse) further validate momentum. However, the RSI at 49.3 and neutral %K signal potential short-term weakness, tempering the otherwise bullish technical outlook. News coverage is uniformly positive, with multiple articles highlighting growth strategies, AI expansion, and value investor interest, which could attract institutional or long-term investors. Conversely, risk metrics reveal significant volatility, with a Keltner Channel (0.06) indicating a 50.2% historical maximum drawdown over three years, despite a modest 2.9% annualized return. This volatility underscores the stock’s speculative nature, particularly for risk-averse investors.
The stock exhibits strong uptrend confirmation with prices above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and price above SAR, but the RSI (49.3) and neutral %K suggest short-term caution.
Technical strength signals sustained bullish momentum, but RSI weakness may indicate overbought conditions or impending pullbacks.
All recent news articles are positive, emphasizing growth strategies, AI expansion, and comparative value investor interest, reinforcing long-term bullish sentiment.
Positive news coverage can drive investor confidence and attract capital, potentially supporting upward price movement.
The stock displays high volatility, with a Keltner Channel of 0.06 and a historical maximum drawdown of 50.2% over three years, despite a low annualized return of 2.9%.
Extreme volatility and drawdown risk suggest heightened uncertainty and potential for significant price swings.
StockIQ conclusion
RELX presents a mixed profile with strong technical support and overwhelmingly positive news sentiment, but its high volatility and historical drawdown risk create significant concerns for risk-averse investors. The stock’s ability to sustain momentum depends on whether technical indicators stabilize and whether AI-driven growth strategies deliver on expectations. While short-term bullish signals are present, the underlying volatility and weak RSI suggest caution is warranted, particularly for speculative investors.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/16/202643
This Week
72
7D Ago
↓ -29
Weakening
Technical
23
7D Ago: 67
↓ -44
News
92
7D Ago: 100
↓ -8
Risk
42
7D Ago: 42
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
43
Today
77
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🔎 What Changed (vs. 30 days ago)
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
43 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 28, 2026
Then
77
$36.30
Now
43
$33.24
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
23
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of RELX PLC highlights three main themes: analysts upgraded the stock to a Zacks Rank #2 “Buy,” reflecting growing optimism about its earnings outlook; its LexisNexis Risk Solutions unit released a study showing SNAP fraud costs at a five‑year high; and Brightmine announced that its HR‑compliance tools can now be embedded in third‑party HR platforms, expanding the company’s data‑driven services.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about RELX PLC PLC American Depositary Shares (Each representing One Ordinary Share). News trend score: 92. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
53
Fundamentals
—
Technical
23
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+6%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+9
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
RELX’s psychology score (19) reflects a paradox: extreme positive sentiment (100/100) drives euphoria despite weak momentum (-1.9% ROC). The narrative-reality gap (12) suggests traders may be overestimating fundamentals. Key uncertainty lies in whether sentiment remains detached from price action or if volume spikes signal impending correction. The absence of panic or herding signals keeps behavior ambiguous.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:51 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"4-Factor Dividend Growth Strategy targets high-quality, growth-oriented dividend stocks"
"TRI's recurring revenue strength... and rising AI adoption support momentum"
"RELX Plc maintains robust high-single-digit organic growth, with Legal and STM segments accelerating"
"Evaluating RELX PLC’s (RELX) Enterprise Advantages in the AI Era"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 88/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for RELX reveal a stark divide between those that see speculative or speculative-leaning signals and those that either dismiss it outright or treat it as a neutral-to-risky hold. Charles Mackay’s high score (66) suggests a crowd-driven excitement, aligning with his focus on speculative bubbles, while Edgar Lawrence Smith’s perfect score (100) reflects his lack of dividend/growth data—though his model defaults to extreme caution when data is insufficient. In contrast, Jack Schwager’s low score (26) and Jack Schwager’s wizards’ verdict indicate a complete lack of disciplined setup, reinforcing a hands-off stance. Meanwhile, the majority—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot—all score 50 with verdicts citing insufficient data, framing RELX as a blind spot rather than a clear opportunity. Even the more nuanced approaches, like Howard Marks’ mixed verdict (41) or Gerald Loeb’s moderate risk assessment (46), imply this stock is either overpriced or too ambiguous to justify aggressive participation, while Samuel Nelson’s mid-cycle neutrality (55) and Jesse Livermore’s indecision (52) further underscore the lack of consensus.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 88
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 54
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 49
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 7.8.2026 | $0.279 |
| 8.5.2026 | $0.656 |
| 7.5.2026 | $0.656 |
| 8.8.2025 | $0.263 |
| 7.8.2025 | $0.263 |
| 9.5.2025 | $0.559 |
| 8.5.2025 | $0.559 |
| 2.8.2024 | $0.234 |
| 1.8.2024 | $0.234 |
| 2.5.2024 | $0.526 |
| 1.5.2024 | $0.526 |
| 3.8.2023 | $0.220 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Zacks · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
PR Newswire · 22.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Investor's Business Daily · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for RELX PLC PLC American Depositary Shares (Each representing One Ordinary Share) (RELX) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for RELX specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
RELX's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: +2.6% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.00 (3y annualized return -0.1% / max drawdown 50.2%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — RELX has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,707,402 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 6,105,708 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
37.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 50.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology