Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$49.27
▼ $1.07 (-2.1%)
Market data updated: 09/17 08:08 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$2.89B
Day Range
$49.24 - $50.33
52-Week Range
$36.96 - $51.29
Beta
—
Next Earnings
15.12.2026
ABM is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+9.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 102.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $16.92 vs. price $49.27 (-65.7%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (62/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
9d ago · $48.35
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 2 to 38 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
87
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
38
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of ABM Industries Incorporated has centered on its **Q3 2026 earnings report**, highlighting **record revenue growth** and an **upward revision to full-year guidance**. Analysts praised the company’s strong financial performance, with profits exceeding expectations, while broader market volatility—driven by Middle East tensions—cast a shadow over broader equity trends. Investors were encouraged to retain ABM stock amid its robust results.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about ABM Industries Incorporated. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
38
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
52
Fundamentals
38
Technical
87
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+12%
Market Narrative
84
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+43
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixating on the 1.7% gap below resistance, potentially limiting upside despite strong momentum and extreme valuation. The narrative gap (81 vs. 41) indicates optimism vastly outpaces fundamentals, consistent with overconfidence and euphoria. However, the lack of panic or herd behavior suggests discipline remains intact. The key question is whether traders will break the resistance anchor or hold near-term, given the disconnect between price and fair value.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:25 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"ABM Industries Inc reported record revenue and raised full-year guidance in Q3 2026 earnings call (articles 1, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11)"
"Q3 earnings and revenues exceeded estimates (articles 6, 10, 11)"
"ABM tightened full-year earnings outlook but maintained positive quarterly performance (article 8)"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 79/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 26/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for ABM reflects deep philosophical splits between methodologies. Peter Lynch’s high score (79) suggests he’d see untapped growth potential, while the majority—including Graham, Marks, and Fisher—flagged it as overvalued or risky, with scores below 30. Veblen’s caution (60) and Smith’s lukewarm take (58) hint at doubts about profitability, contrasting sharply with Lynch’s optimism. Meanwhile, the efficient-market camp (55) and Livermore (54) lean neutral, questioning whether active selection adds value over passive strategies. At the extreme, Nelson’s low score (10) and Schwager’s (21) signal outright skepticism, warning of speculative bubbles or poor technical setups—highlighting how even similar growth signals can clash with contrasting risk tolerances and valuation frameworks.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 79
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 62
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 60
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 58
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 54
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 45
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 42
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 42
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 33
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 33
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 30
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 28
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 26
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 26
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 0 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
12.3%
Operating Margin
3.6%
Net Margin
1.9%
EBITDA Margin
4.8%
ROE
9.1%
ROA
3.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.61
Cash
$104.10M
Total Debt
$1.57B
Current Ratio
1.48
Debt/Equity
0.88
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 2.7.2026 | $0.290 |
| 1.7.2026 | $0.290 |
| 2.4.2026 | $0.290 |
| 1.4.2026 | $0.290 |
| 14.1.2026 | $0.290 |
| 13.1.2026 | $0.290 |
| 2.10.2025 | $0.265 |
| 1.10.2025 | $0.265 |
| 3.7.2025 | $0.265 |
| 2.7.2025 | $0.265 |
| 3.4.2025 | $0.265 |
| 2.4.2025 | $0.265 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$49.27
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$16.92
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-65.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.9% | $161.09M | $147.79M |
| 2 | 3.5% | $166.76M | $140.36M |
| 3 | 3.2% | $172.07M | $132.87M |
| 4 | 2.8% | $176.95M | $125.36M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $181.38M | $117.88M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$155.10M
Terminal Value
$2.86B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.86B
Enterprise Value
$2.52B
Net Debt
$1.46B
Equity Value
$1.06B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$28.48
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$16.73
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Motley Fool · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ABM currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ABM's estimated fair value is $16.92, which is 65.7% below the current price of $49.27. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ABM's technical score is 87/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 102.3%; Net income growth: 99.5%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $16.92 vs. price $49.27 (-65.7%); Calmar: 0.19 (3y annualized return 6.7% / max drawdown 36.2%); Free cash flow growth: -7.3%.
Yes — ABM has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VALENTIN RAUL JAVIER | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 1,639 | -1,639 | $48.00 |
| VALENTIN RAUL JAVIER | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 49,036 | -1,639 | $48.00 |
| CHIN DEAN A | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 3,958 | -3,958 | $45.31 |
| CHIN DEAN A | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 16,993 | -3,958 | $45.31 |
| ORR DAVID MARSHALL | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 539 | -539 | $44.54 |
| ORR DAVID MARSHALL | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 36,034 | -539 | $44.54 |
| SALMIRS SCOTT B | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 39,576 | -39,576 | $46.25 |
| SALMIRS SCOTT B | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 10,424 | -10,424 | $46.69 |
| SALMIRS SCOTT B | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 434,861 | -10,424 | $46.69 |
| SALMIRS SCOTT B | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 395,285 | -39,576 | $46.25 |
| JACOBSEN RENE | Open Market Sale | 9.2.2026 | 9,339 | -9,339 | $47.23 |
| JACOBSEN RENE | Open Market Sale | 9.2.2026 | 41,626 | -9,339 | $47.23 |
| JACOBSEN RENE | Open Market Sale | 13.1.2026 | 31,034 | -31,034 | $44.12 |
| JACOBSEN RENE | Open Market Sale | 13.1.2026 | 51,714 | -31,034 | $44.12 |
| CHIN DEAN A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.1.2026 | 3,293 | +3,293 | — |
| TOLAR MIRANDA ROSE | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.1.2026 | 1,270 | +1,270 | — |
| CHIN DEAN A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.1.2026 | 1,232 | -1,232 | $44.69 |
| JACOBSEN RENE | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.1.2026 | 22,230 | +22,230 | — |
| TOLAR MIRANDA ROSE | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.1.2026 | 523 | -523 | $44.69 |
| JACOBSEN RENE | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.1.2026 | 2,003 | -2,003 | $44.69 |
| CHIN DEAN A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.1.2026 | 248 | -248 | $44.69 |
| MAHONEY SEAN MICHAEL | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.1.2026 | 2,634 | -2,634 | $44.69 |
| JACOBSEN RENE | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.1.2026 | 11,022 | -11,022 | $44.69 |
| Ruiz Melanie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.1.2026 | 881 | -881 | $44.69 |
| Ruiz Melanie | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.1.2026 | 2,426 | +2,426 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,232,623 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,943,345 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 76.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology