Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$58.84
▼ $0.45 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/19 09:54 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$58.82B
Day Range
$58.69 - $59.41
52-Week Range
$38.80 - $67.45
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$51.87
Resistance
$63.77
OXY is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+24.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $34.80 vs. price $58.84 (-40.9%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
86/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
-4.8%
Median 40D Outcome
68/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
40%
+2.0% … +5.7%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
60%
-9.3% … -7.5%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 40% (95% CI 20%–64%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -6.7%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
7 occurrence(s) · 29% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.9% | -3.4% … +1.9% | +0.1% |
| 10D | 27% (11%–52%) | -2.2% | -6.1% … +0.8% | +0.1% |
| 20D | 40% (20%–64%) | -6.7% | -8.2% … +2.5% | +0.4% |
| 40D | 13% (4%–38%) | -4.8% | -9.0% … -3.4% | -0.7% |
| 60D | 27% (11%–52%) | -8.5% | -11.1% … +3.3% | -1.2% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-08 | 86/100 | Consolidation | -11.7% | -8.5% |
| 2024-07-24 | 86/100 | Downtrend | -6.7% | -13.9% |
| 2017-10-31 | 85/100 | Uptrend | +8.3% | +18.1% |
| 2025-09-22 | 85/100 | Consolidation | -10.3% | -14.9% |
| 2024-05-06 | 84/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -7.9% | -8.7% |
| 2018-02-06 | 84/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -8.5% | +8.5% |
| 2018-06-21 | 84/100 | Consolidation | +1.2% | -5.5% |
| 2018-09-10 | 83/100 | Consolidation | +6.3% | -9.4% |
| 2023-09-20 | 82/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +3.5% | -8.5% |
| 2026-05-12 | 82/100 | Consolidation | +1.5% | -0.6% |
| 2026-06-09 | 81/100 | Consolidation | -7.5% | +7.2% |
| 2024-08-19 | 80/100 | Downtrend | -9.3% | -12.4% |
| 2025-12-11 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +3.7% | +34.9% |
| 2024-07-08 | 80/100 | Consolidation | -7.8% | -12.6% |
| 2026-04-13 | 79/100 | Uptrend | -5.0% | -9.9% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
44
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
50
Value
33
Momentum
43
Risk
34
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
43
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING OXY...
Recent media coverage of Occidental Petroleum (OXY) has focused on its stock performance and financial strength. Analysts have initiated "Buy" ratings with an optimistic price target of $73, citing strong earnings growth—OXY’s stock rose 8.2% since its last report—and highlighting its status as a cash-producing company. Dividend discussions and comparisons to Warren Buffett’s portfolio also surfaced, though no new dividend changes were reported. Overall, the tone leans bullish on OXY’s fundamentals and market outlook.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Occidental Petroleum. News trend score: 86. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
43
Technical
43
Valuation
33
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+29
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests OXY is caught in a **herding dynamic**, where traders align with peers (+1.0% move) rather than fundamentals. The extreme narrative gap (+39) and overvaluation (+74% above DCF) indicate **confirmation bias** and **overconfidence** may be reinforcing the rally, despite weak momentum (-0.1% ROC). The key open question is whether the detached optimism (euphoria) will persist or if a divergence from peers could trigger a re-evaluation. Low volatility (0.89x ATR) and neutral volume (0.96x) reduce panic risk but also signal complacency.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 08:59 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Seaport Global initiates coverage on Occidental Petroleum (OXY) with a Buy rating and announces Price Target of $73"
"Occidental (OXY) reported earnings 30 days ago... OXY Up 8.2% Since Last Earnings Report"
"While strong cash flow is a key indicator of stability... Occidental (OXY) Up 8.2% Since Last Earnings Report"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 86/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for OXY reflects a clash between passive indexing and rigorous fundamental scrutiny. Burton Malkiel and John Bogle’s efficient-market approach gives it a modest 65, suggesting it could justify a slight deviation from a broad index—likely because it’s not an outright mispricing. Meanwhile, the majority of methodologies—especially those rooted in valuation discipline (Graham, Lynch, Fisher) or cyclical caution (Marks, Bagehot)—score it poorly, flagging risks like overvaluation, liquidity concerns, or lack of growth quality. Even mid-tier signals (Smith, Mackay) lean toward neutrality, while contrarian or trend-following frameworks (Livermore, Schwager) outright dismiss it. The contrast underscores how OXY’s perceived volatility and speculative traits repel strict fundamentalists but might intrigue passive or momentum-leaning investors.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 86
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 56
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 55
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 55
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 41
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 35
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 32
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 31
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 30
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 27
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 24
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 15
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 14
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 8
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
11.0%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
6.6%
ROA
2.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.65
Cash
$1.97B
Total Debt
$21.40B
Current Ratio
0.94
Debt/Equity
0.59
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.9.2026 | $0.280 |
| 10.6.2026 | $0.260 |
| 9.6.2026 | $0.260 |
| 10.3.2026 | $0.260 |
| 9.3.2026 | $0.260 |
| 10.12.2025 | $0.240 |
| 9.12.2025 | $0.240 |
| 10.9.2025 | $0.240 |
| 9.9.2025 | $0.240 |
| 10.6.2025 | $0.240 |
| 9.6.2025 | $0.240 |
| 10.3.2025 | $0.240 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$58.84
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$34.80
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-40.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $3.90B | $3.58B |
| 2 | -3.1% | $3.78B | $3.18B |
| 3 | -1.2% | $3.73B | $2.88B |
| 4 | 0.6% | $3.75B | $2.66B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $3.85B | $2.50B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$4.11B
Terminal Value
$60.68B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$39.44B
Enterprise Value
$54.23B
Net Debt
$19.43B
Equity Value
$34.81B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$36.03
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$35.36
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 6 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
CNBC · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Occidental Petroleum (OXY) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 44/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
OXY currently scores 44/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, OXY's estimated fair value is $34.80, which is 40.9% below the current price of $58.84. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
OXY's technical score is 43/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; +11.5% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $34.80 vs. price $58.84 (-40.9%); Current ratio: 0.94; Calmar: -0.08 (3y annualized return -3.7% / max drawdown 47.9%).
Yes — OXY has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLLACK BRAD | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 26,284 | +26,284 | — |
| POLLACK BRAD | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 42,660 | +26,284 | — |
| Jackson Richard A. | Open Market Purchase | 23.6.2026 | 4,770 | +4,770 | $52.38 |
| Jackson Richard A. | Open Market Purchase | 23.6.2026 | 444,098 | +4,770 | $52.38 |
| Hollub Vicki A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 3,183 | +3,183 | — |
| Jackson Richard A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 101,833 | +101,833 | — |
| Hollub Vicki A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 701 | -701 | $58.92 |
| Hollub Vicki A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 73,477 | -73,477 | $58.92 |
| Hollub Vicki A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,112,004 | +3,183 | — |
| Hollub Vicki A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 1,111,303 | -701 | $58.92 |
| Hollub Vicki A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 1,037,826 | -73,477 | $58.92 |
| Jackson Richard A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 439,328 | +101,833 | — |
| GOULD ANDREW | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.5.2026 | 1,494 | -1,494 | $60.27 |
| KLESSE WILLIAM R | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.5.2026 | 913 | -913 | $60.27 |
| POLADIAN AVEDICK BARUYR | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 4,149 | +4,149 | — |
| MOORE JACK B | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 6,720 | +6,720 | — |
| Robinson Kenneth B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.5.2026 | 913 | -913 | $60.27 |
| Robinson Kenneth B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 4,149 | +4,149 | — |
| BAILEY VICKY A | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 3,734 | +3,734 | — |
| ONeill Claire | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 3,734 | +3,734 | — |
| GOULD ANDREW | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 4,978 | +4,978 | — |
| BAILEY VICKY A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.5.2026 | 1,223 | -1,223 | $60.27 |
| MOORE JACK B | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.5.2026 | 1,479 | -1,479 | $60.27 |
| GUTIERREZ CARLOS M | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 3,734 | +3,734 | — |
| KLESSE WILLIAM R | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 4,149 | +4,149 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
20,965,218 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 22,715,229 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology