Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$311.57
▼ $0.17 (-0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/21 03:09 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$17.35B
Day Range
$309.15 - $312.27
52-Week Range
$220.47 - $339.12
Beta
—
Next Earnings
08.12.2026
Support
$283.01
Resistance
$339.12
NDSN is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+36.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 34.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $150.14 vs. price $311.57 (-51.8%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (64/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
87/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
92/100
Analog Quality
+2.6%
Median 40D Outcome
58/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
73%
+3.3% … +8.6%
🟡 Base
7%
+0.6% … +0.6%
🔴 Bearish
20%
-16.4% … -8.9%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 73% (95% CI 48%–89%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +3.8%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
5 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Echo #2 — Trend Acceleration
3 occurrence(s) · 67% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 40% (20%–64%) | +0.5% | -2.0% … +1.7% | +0.4% |
| 10D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.9% | -1.6% … +3.1% | +0.8% |
| 20D | 73% (48%–89%) | +3.8% | +1.3% … +7.9% | +1.3% |
| 40D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.6% | -2.1% … +6.5% | +2.5% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +3.4% | -7.9% … +11.0% | +3.8% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-20 | 87/100 | Consolidation | +7.1% | +12.2% |
| 2020-12-14 | 84/100 | Consolidation | +1.9% | +1.0% |
| 2019-03-19 | 83/100 | Consolidation | +9.1% | +0.7% |
| 2021-05-24 | 83/100 | Consolidation | +8.2% | +12.1% |
| 2020-07-10 | 82/100 | Uptrend | +7.0% | +5.3% |
| 2019-12-27 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +7.7% | -26.5% |
| 2024-01-24 | 80/100 | Uptrend | +8.9% | +3.4% |
| 2026-06-08 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +0.6% | +12.2% |
| 2019-05-16 | 79/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -5.9% | -1.5% |
| 2026-03-24 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +3.8% | +9.9% |
| 2018-10-03 | 79/100 | Consolidation | -12.0% | -14.4% |
| 2024-10-10 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +2.7% | -19.0% |
| 2026-05-04 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +2.6% | +5.3% |
| 2025-12-09 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +9.3% | +16.3% |
| 2024-12-09 | 76/100 | Consolidation | -20.9% | -16.8% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
64
Quality
58
Value
33
Momentum
46
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
74
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING NDSN...
Recent media coverage of Nordson Corporation has focused on its **strong financial performance and investor-friendly initiatives**, including a **15% dividend hike** to $0.94 per share, marking 63 consecutive annual increases. The company also highlighted **upgraded Q2 earnings** (10.3% revenue growth, beating estimates) and introduced **AI-focused semiconductor packaging solutions** at SEMICON Taiwan 2026, reinforcing its leadership in advanced tech and medical segments amid market optimism. Analysts debated whether shares remain undervalued amid robust shareholder returns.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Nordson Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
74
Technical
46
Valuation
33
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
76
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+36
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
NDSN’s psychology suggests traders are detached from valuation reality, with overconfidence (49) dominating. The 111% DCF premium and momentum vs. stagnant EPS growth imply overestimation of growth potential. Herding (39) and euphoria (39) reflect peer underperformance and sentiment-driven buying, while FOMO (16) remains muted. The key question: *Is the 40-point narrative gap (80 vs. 40) masking deteriorating fundamentals?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:53 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Nordson has now raised its dividend for 63 consecutive years"
"Nordson Corporation recently increased its quarterly cash dividend by 15% to US$0.94 per share"
"revenue ahead of Wall Street’s expectations in Q2 CY2026, with sales up 10.3% year on year"
"new AI-focused packaging platforms and MARCH ExoSPHERE plasma treatment system for advanced semiconductor packaging"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 78/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for NDSN reflects deep philosophical divides in investing philosophy. Morgan Housel and Philip Fisher both see potential as a quiet compounder or solid long-term hold, scoring well because their frameworks prioritize patient, quality-oriented growth—even if Fisher’s bar for exceptional quality isn’t fully met. Meanwhile, Graham’s strict valuation and defensive criteria slam the stock with a 15, while Lynch’s growth-at-a-reasonable-price filter also rejects it outright. The middle ground—where methodologies like Smith, Livermore, or Nelson hover around 58—suggests a lack of decisive signals, balancing cautious optimism with neutral or ambiguous readings. Even the efficient-market camp dismisses it as unexceptional, while late-cycle warnings from Howard Marks and crowd psychology concerns from Mackay flag systemic risks that more fundamental or contrarian investors would avoid.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 78
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 73
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 64
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 64
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 58
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 53
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 44
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 33
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 32
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 26
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 25
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 15
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
55.2%
Operating Margin
25.5%
Net Margin
17.4%
EBITDA Margin
28.3%
ROE
15.9%
ROA
8.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$8.56
Cash
$108.44M
Total Debt
$2.00B
Current Ratio
1.64
Debt/Equity
0.66
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.9.2026 | $0.940 |
| 18.6.2026 | $0.820 |
| 17.6.2026 | $0.820 |
| 19.3.2026 | $0.820 |
| 18.3.2026 | $0.820 |
| 17.12.2025 | $0.820 |
| 16.12.2025 | $0.820 |
| 11.9.2025 | $0.820 |
| 10.9.2025 | $0.820 |
| 18.6.2025 | $0.780 |
| 17.6.2025 | $0.780 |
| 20.3.2025 | $0.780 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$311.57
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$150.14
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-51.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5% | $677.85M | $621.88M |
| 2 | 2.5% | $694.96M | $584.94M |
| 3 | 2.5% | $712.45M | $550.14M |
| 4 | 2.5% | $730.31M | $517.37M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $748.57M | $486.52M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$661.12M
Terminal Value
$11.80B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$7.67B
Enterprise Value
$10.43B
Net Debt
$1.89B
Equity Value
$8.55B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$53.47
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$16.56
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 6 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 6.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
StockStory · 5.9.2026
Nordson Corporation (NDSN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NDSN currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NDSN's estimated fair value is $150.14, which is 51.8% below the current price of $311.57. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NDSN's technical score is 46/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 34.4%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 1.64.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $150.14 vs. price $311.57 (-51.8%); Calmar: 0.26 (3y annualized return 10.5% / max drawdown 39.9%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — NDSN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morris Milton Mayo | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 156 | -156 | $316.63 |
| Hall Justin E | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 118 | -118 | $314.40 |
| MCDONOUGH JENNIFER L | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 6,346 | -260 | $336.00 |
| MCDONOUGH JENNIFER L | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 260 | -260 | $336.00 |
| Hopgood Daniel Roy | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 1,329 | -1,329 | $334.29 |
| Hopgood Daniel Roy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 1,329 | +1,329 | $209.73 |
| Hopgood Daniel Roy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 1,329 | -1,329 | $334.29 |
| Hopgood Daniel Roy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 6,087 | +1,329 | $209.73 |
| Hopgood Daniel Roy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 15,695 | -1,329 | $334.29 |
| Hopgood Daniel Roy | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 4,758 | -1,329 | $334.29 |
| DeFord John A | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 84 | +84 | $297.78 |
| Rutledge Joseph M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 274 | -274 | $297.78 |
| MAPES CHRISTOPHER L | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 42 | +42 | $297.78 |
| MAPES CHRISTOPHER L | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 3,025 | +42 | $297.78 |
| DeFord John A | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 5,902 | +84 | $297.78 |
| Rutledge Joseph M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 2,818 | -274 | $297.78 |
| Hopgood Daniel Roy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 148 | -148 | $281.31 |
| Hopgood Daniel Roy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 4,758 | -148 | $281.31 |
| CLAYTON ANNETTE K | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 270 | +270 | $283.20 |
| CLAYTON ANNETTE K | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 2,098 | +270 | $283.20 |
| DeFord John A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 87 | +87 | $288.45 |
| MAPES CHRISTOPHER L | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 43 | +43 | $288.45 |
| MAPES CHRISTOPHER L | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 2,975 | +43 | $288.45 |
| DeFord John A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.4.2026 | 5,802 | +87 | $288.45 |
| Subramanian Srinivas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.4.2026 | 1,900 | -1,900 | $280.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,611,120 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,678,170 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology