Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$1,015.80
▲ $38.30 (+3.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:22 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$1.15T
Day Range
$977.93 - $1,016.44
52-Week Range
$154.65 - $1,255.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
30.09.2026
Support
$737.88
Resistance
$1,042.40
MU is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+501.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 21/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 48.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $32.24 vs. price $1,015.80 (-96.8%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (82/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
78/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
87/100
Analog Quality
+6.5%
Median 40D Outcome
32/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+8.3% … +15.7%
🟡 Base
7%
-1.0% … -1.0%
🔴 Bearish
40%
-12.3% … -2.6%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 40 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +3.4%.
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.1% | -2.9% … +3.5% | +0.7% |
| 10D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.4% | -5.0% … +6.6% | +1.4% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +3.4% | -2.8% … +10.3% | +2.1% |
| 40D | 67% (42%–85%) | +6.5% | -1.6% … +17.2% | +4.4% |
| 60D | 67% (42%–85%) | +3.8% | -3.6% … +22.0% | +7.3% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-27 | 78/100 | High Volatility | -2.3% | -13.1% |
| 2020-05-08 | 75/100 | High Volatility | +11.3% | +6.3% |
| 2020-06-30 | 74/100 | Uptrend | -2.2% | -4.0% |
| 2023-04-10 | 74/100 | Uptrend | -3.8% | -3.2% |
| 2020-09-14 | 74/100 | Consolidation | +3.4% | +49.3% |
| 2020-07-27 | 73/100 | Uptrend | -15.2% | +3.8% |
| 2019-08-29 | 73/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -3.3% | +2.7% |
| 2023-04-28 | 73/100 | Uptrend | +14.9% | +4.7% |
| 2017-08-22 | 72/100 | Consolidation | +18.1% | +49.0% |
| 2022-05-31 | 72/100 | Consolidation | -24.1% | -17.1% |
| 2020-10-08 | 72/100 | Consolidation | +9.4% | +54.8% |
| 2018-02-14 | 72/100 | High Volatility | +35.4% | +19.3% |
| 2020-06-16 | 72/100 | High Volatility | -1.0% | -12.1% |
| 2023-05-16 | 71/100 | Uptrend | +8.5% | +1.0% |
| 2021-11-18 | 71/100 | Consolidation | +7.8% | +24.6% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/11/202669
This Week
73
7D Ago
↓ -4
Weakening
Technical
67
7D Ago: 85
↓ -18
Fundamental
77
7D Ago: 77
→ 0
Growth
82
7D Ago: 82
→ 0
Valuation
33
7D Ago: 33
→ 0
News
98
7D Ago: 100
→ -2
Quality
63
7D Ago: 63
→ 0
Risk
62
7D Ago: 62
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
69
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
3d ago · $927.60
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 1 to 28 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $927.60
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 60)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $924.03
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 23 to -6 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
8d ago · $974.71
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 58)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
10d ago · $1,027.77
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 60)
What happened after
10d ago · $1,000.27
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 43 to 18 day-over-day
What happened after
14d ago · $1,016.59
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 58)
What happened after
14d ago · $1,016.59
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 17 to 46 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
69 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 10, 2026
Then
73
$1,027.77
Now
69
$1,015.80
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
67
Risk
62
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
77
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING MU...
Recent coverage of Micron Technology has largely focused on stock‑comparisons and future speculation. Articles pit Micron against Broadcom to decide which is a better buy in 2026, while others project Micron’s trajectory over the next decade and even suggest it could be the “next Nvidia.” Meanwhile, a notable sell‑side view cites billionaire Stanley Druckenmiller dumping Micron, and another piece notes Micron is not the pick among the “dirt cheap Magnificent Seven” in the AI race.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Micron Technology. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
55
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
64
Fundamentals
77
Technical
67
Valuation
33
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-10%
Market Narrative
86
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+43
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant overconfidence—driven by extreme valuation disconnects (3003% above DCF)—suggests traders are prioritizing recent gains over fundamentals. FOMO and euphoria coexist, as momentum and sentiment remain positive but unsupported by earnings growth. The key question is whether traders will adjust expectations when the narrative gap (62 vs. 44) widens further, or if anchoring near resistance (4.1%) halts further upside. Herding and panic are absent, implying no broad panic or forced alignment, but confirmation bias remains dormant.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:38 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MU) and Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL) offer two ways to invest in AI demand. One sells essential memory."
"Micron and Sandisk Surge as Goldman Spots Powerful Shift in Memory Stocks"
"Micron (MU) settling at $1, representing a -1.61% change from its previous close."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 24D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles, the model estimates that Peter Lynch, Edgar Lawrence Smith and Philip Fisher all assign very high scores (96‑93), reflecting their focus on strong growth, long‑term buy‑and‑hold appeal and exceptional company quality. In contrast, investors such as Walter Bagehot, Samuel Nelson and Thorstein Veblen give moderate scores (86‑67), emphasizing liquidity, favorable cycle positioning and alignment of growth with value creation rather than pure price momentum. The more conservative or market‑efficiency oriented frameworks of Howard Marks, the Graham variants and Jack Schwager rate the stock much lower (44‑19), highlighting concerns about high expectations, insufficient margin of safety and a lack of a clear technical setup. These divergent outcomes illustrate how differing emphasis on growth versus valuation, cycle context, and risk tolerance lead each methodology to a distinct assessment of MU.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 94
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 93
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 85
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 67
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 60
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 58
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 35
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 30
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 22
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 20
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 20
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 14
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
39.8%
Operating Margin
26.1%
Net Margin
22.8%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
15.8%
ROA
10.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.65
Cash
$9.64B
Total Debt
$12.09B
Current Ratio
2.52
Debt/Equity
0.27
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 6.7.2026 | $0.150 |
| 5.7.2026 | $0.150 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.150 |
| 29.3.2026 | $0.150 |
| 29.12.2025 | $0.115 |
| 28.12.2025 | $0.115 |
| 3.10.2025 | $0.115 |
| 2.10.2025 | $0.115 |
| 7.7.2025 | $0.115 |
| 6.7.2025 | $0.115 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.115 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.115 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1,015.80
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$32.24
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-96.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
20.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.3% | $2.01B | $1.84B |
| 2 | 15.9% | $2.33B | $1.96B |
| 3 | 11.4% | $2.59B | $2.00B |
| 4 | 7.0% | $2.77B | $1.96B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $2.84B | $1.85B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.67B
Terminal Value
$44.79B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$29.11B
Enterprise Value
$38.72B
Net Debt
$2.45B
Equity Value
$36.27B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$48.28
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$47.87
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Micron Technology (MU) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 69/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MU currently scores 69/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MU's estimated fair value is $32.24, which is 96.8% below the current price of $1,015.80. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MU's technical score is 67/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 48.9%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 984.3%; Free cash flow growth: 1278.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $32.24 vs. price $1,015.80 (-96.8%); ATR: 4.8% of price; -12.4% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — MU has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 84 | -84 | $985.40 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 863 | -863 | $975.75 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,127 | -1,127 | $976.80 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,354 | -1,354 | $983.11 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 258 | -258 | $989.59 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 716 | -716 | $981.92 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 337 | -337 | $974.17 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 351 | -351 | $988.10 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 664 | -664 | $978.02 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,091 | -1,091 | $979.20 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 637 | -637 | $984.12 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 458 | -458 | $980.00 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 341 | -341 | $986.24 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 2,847 | -2,847 | $968.77 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,023 | -1,023 | $970.71 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 144 | -144 | $959.14 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 3,434 | -3,434 | $964.67 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 2,930 | -2,930 | $965.81 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 301 | -301 | $972.78 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,047 | -1,047 | $971.78 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 2,938 | -2,938 | $966.85 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 823 | -823 | $960.41 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 4,305 | -4,305 | $962.84 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,586 | -1,586 | $961.58 |
| MEHROTRA SANJAY | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 4,227 | -4,227 | $963.84 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
29,705,339 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 29,892,897 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
39.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 44.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology