Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$58.15
▼ $0.16 (-0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 11:28 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$2.49B
Day Range
$57.39 - $58.45
52-Week Range
$23.76 - $59.97
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$38.75
Resistance
$59.97
LPG is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+79.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 23/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 36.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.42 (3y annualized return 27.5% / max drawdown 66.1%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/10/202666
This Week
70
7D Ago
↓ -4
Weakening
Technical
82
7D Ago: 94
↓ -12
Fundamental
78
7D Ago: 78
→ 0
Growth
74
7D Ago: 74
→ 0
Valuation
55
7D Ago: 55
→ 0
News
20
7D Ago: 26
↓ -6
Quality
63
7D Ago: 63
→ 0
Risk
54
7D Ago: 54
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
66
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $53.57
Evidence: +4.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
15d ago · $53.57
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
15d ago · $53.57
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
15d ago · $53.57
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 56)
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
66 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 28, 2026
Then
77
$49.28
Now
66
$58.15
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
63
Value
55
Momentum
82
Risk
54
Sentiment
20
Fundamental
78
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Dorian LPG Ltd. has centered on its strategic expansion, highlighting the company’s $345 million order for three dual-fuel Panamax VLGCs from Hanwha Ocean, set for delivery in late 2030. These vessels, capable of burning LPG or low-sulfur fuels, reflect Dorian’s focus on modernizing its fleet. Additionally, the company announced forward chartering estimates and secured a new credit facility, reinforcing its financial stability and growth outlook amid broader energy sector volatility.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Dorian LPG Ltd.. News trend score: 20. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 1 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
49
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
53
Fundamentals
78
Technical
82
Valuation
55
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+47%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+6
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for LPG is dominated by anchoring, with traders fixating on the near-resistance level (0.1% away), despite strong momentum and overbought conditions. Euphoria and overconfidence are also present, as price momentum (+11.2% ROC) vastly outpaces fundamental growth (+1.1% EPS), while extreme overvaluation (+34.2% above 200-day average) fuels speculative enthusiasm. The key open question is whether traders will break resistance or adjust expectations downward, given the disconnect between price action and fundamentals. FOMO and herding remain muted, suggesting limited contagion from peers or broader market trends.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:48 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Dorian LPG orders three dual-fuel Panamax VLGCs from Hanwha Ocean"
"Each VLGC will be equipped with dual-fuel engines capable of burning LPG or conventional low-sulphur fuels"
"Dorian LPG Ltd. announces new credit facility alongside newbuilding contracts"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 3/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-oriented and value/cycle-sensitive methodologies. Peter Lynch, Philip Fisher, and Edgar Lawrence Smith all rate it near the top (95, 93, and 88), emphasizing its potential for long-term growth and exceptional quality—suggesting the company’s fundamentals or market position justify a high-conviction hold. Meanwhile, value-focused investors like Benjamin Graham and Walter Bagehot (78 and 82) still see merit, but with more caution, as the stock may not meet the strict margin-of-safety thresholds of traditional Graham investing. At the opposite end, cyclical or market-savvy frameworks like Samuel Nelson (0) and Charles Mackay (41) flag overbought conditions or crowd-driven behavior, while efficient-market proponents (46) dismiss it as unexceptional. The split highlights whether the stock’s strength lies in its growth trajectory (top-tier scores) or if its valuation already reflects those expectations (lower scores), with middle-ground thinkers like Howard Marks (56) warning that the business may be priced for perfection.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 95
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 93
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 88
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 82
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 79
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 74
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 68
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 59
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 47
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 35
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 3
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
43.6%
Net Margin
40.2%
EBITDA Margin
58.5%
ROE
17.0%
ROA
10.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.55
Cash
$327.41M
Total Debt
$560.39M
Current Ratio
2.67
Debt/Equity
0.49
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 27.7.2026 | $1.000 |
| 26.7.2026 | $1.000 |
| 18.5.2026 | $1.000 |
| 17.5.2026 | $1.000 |
| 9.2.2026 | $0.700 |
| 8.2.2026 | $0.700 |
| 17.11.2025 | $0.650 |
| 16.11.2025 | $0.650 |
| 12.8.2025 | $0.600 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.600 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.500 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.500 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$26.73
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$26.73
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 1 positive, 13 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Barchart · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Rigzone.com · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Offshore Technology · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 66/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
LPG currently scores 66/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
LPG's technical score is 82/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 36.3%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 112.1%; Net income growth: 114.8%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.42 (3y annualized return 27.5% / max drawdown 66.1%); RSI 74.0 — approaching overbought territory; %K 81.8 — overbought.
Yes — LPG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hadjipateras Alexander C. | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $54.13 |
| Young Theodore B. | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 11,919 | -11,919 | $54.50 |
| Hansen Tim Truels | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 50,000 | -50,000 | $53.12 |
| Young Theodore B. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $54.01 |
| Young Theodore B. | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 9,081 | -9,081 | $53.25 |
| Hansen Tim Truels | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $45.04 |
| Hansen Tim Truels | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 157,675 | -25,000 | $45.04 |
| Young Theodore B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 5,098 | -5,098 | $43.05 |
| Young Theodore B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 4,083 | -4,083 | $43.05 |
| Lycouris John | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 4,634 | -4,634 | $43.05 |
| Hadjipateras Alexander C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 16,382 | +16,382 | — |
| Young Theodore B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 26,432 | +26,432 | — |
| Hadjipateras Alexander C. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 2,165 | -2,165 | $43.05 |
| Hadjipateras Alexander C. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 2,536 | -2,536 | $43.05 |
| Young Theodore B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 6,383 | -6,383 | $43.05 |
| Hadjipateras Alexander C. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 1,385 | -1,385 | $43.05 |
| HADJIPATERAS JOHN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 45,429 | +45,429 | — |
| Lycouris John | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 5,585 | -5,585 | $43.05 |
| Hansen Tim Truels | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 24,833 | +24,833 | — |
| Lycouris John | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 3,573 | -3,573 | $43.05 |
| Lycouris John | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 23,128 | +23,128 | — |
| HADJIPATERAS JOHN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 1,882,667 | +45,429 | — |
| Young Theodore B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 149,358 | +26,432 | — |
| Young Theodore B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 144,260 | -5,098 | $43.05 |
| Young Theodore B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 137,877 | -6,383 | $43.05 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,880,142 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,324,680 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
67.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology