Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$143.28
▲ $2.22 (+1.6%)
Market data updated: 09/21 01:56 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$87.42B
Day Range
$140.49 - $143.52
52-Week Range
$104.49 - $157.06
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$135.79
Resistance
$157.06
JCI is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+32.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/27 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 99.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.93
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
81/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
+6.6%
Median 40D Outcome
35/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
73%
+3.8% … +9.2%
🟡 Base
7%
+0.1% … +0.1%
🔴 Bearish
20%
-25.9% … -4.9%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 73% (95% CI 48%–89%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +3.9%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
10 occurrence(s) · 60% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 60% (36%–80%) | +2.2% | -1.1% … +4.3% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.3% | -4.1% … +4.0% | +0.9% |
| 20D | 73% (48%–89%) | +3.9% | +0.8% … +8.3% | +1.7% |
| 40D | 73% (48%–89%) | +6.6% | +0.7% … +13.2% | +4.0% |
| 60D | 73% (48%–89%) | +8.6% | +0.9% … +13.1% | +5.2% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-02 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +5.3% | +27.5% |
| 2024-07-26 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +3.6% | +12.2% |
| 2026-04-01 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +8.4% | +4.3% |
| 2024-05-07 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +11.6% | +4.6% |
| 2025-12-17 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -1.5% | +13.9% |
| 2020-09-10 | 78/100 | Uptrend | +5.1% | +11.6% |
| 2020-11-12 | 77/100 | Uptrend | +3.9% | +18.8% |
| 2023-05-26 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +8.2% | -4.2% |
| 2025-01-16 | 77/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +11.6% | -2.4% |
| 2020-02-24 | 77/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -43.6% | -30.3% |
| 2023-01-24 | 77/100 | Uptrend | -8.2% | -13.9% |
| 2024-09-11 | 76/100 | Uptrend | +9.9% | +17.6% |
| 2025-11-04 | 76/100 | Consolidation | +2.9% | +10.8% |
| 2025-09-04 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +1.5% | +8.6% |
| 2026-05-13 | 74/100 | Uptrend | +0.1% | +4.8% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
50
Value
50
Momentum
57
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
57
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING JCI...
Recent media coverage of Johnson Controls International (JCI) has focused primarily on its stock performance and investor interest, with analysts like Morgan Stanley maintaining an optimistic outlook. The company’s shares have seen mixed momentum—flat over the past day but down over shorter and longer periods, though the year-to-date return remains positive at 33.9% over one year and 5 years. Analysts raised the price target to $180, reflecting confidence in its industrial sector positioning amid broader economic uncertainty. No direct company-specific news beyond financial analysis was prominently featured.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Johnson Controls. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
21
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
30
Fundamentals
57
Technical
57
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-1%
Market Narrative
64
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+26
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
JCI’s psychology is dominated by **euphoria**, as extreme positive sentiment (98/100) and modest momentum (+1.6% ROC) align with overoptimism. The narrative-reality gap (27) suggests traders may be ignoring fundamentals, while low volatility (0.78x ATR) and peer underperformance (-1.3%) reduce counterbalancing caution. The key question: *Is this momentum self-sustaining, or will a pullback reveal overvaluation?* Overconfidence remains muted, but the absence of panic or anchoring hints at complacency—until a trigger emerges.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 05:33 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Morgan Stanley analyst Chris Snyder maintains Johnson Controls Intl (NYSE:JCI) with an Overweight rating and raises the price target from $175 to $180"
"Johnson Controls International (JCI) is drawing investor attention after recent share price moves, with the stock flat over the past day but lower over the past week, month, and 90 days"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for JCI reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Peter Lynch and Thorstein Veblen’s high scores (80 and 70) suggest they see strong growth potential—Lynch believes the stock’s price hasn’t fully reflected its upside, while Veblen aligns the company’s growth with tangible value creation. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s near-zero score (10) and even his Enterprising Investor variant (4) reject the stock outright, dismissing it as statistically overvalued or lacking defensive traits. The middle-ground methodologies—like Morgan Housel (49) or Howard Marks (45)—caution that while the stock may be holdable, it’s not a slam dunk, with concerns over inflated expectations or weak trend signals. This tension between growth-focused and value-driven frameworks underscores whether JCI’s future hinges on momentum (favored by Lynch) or whether its valuation already discounts its risks (rejected by Graham).
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 80
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 70
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 63
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 56
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 54
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 41
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 26
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 23
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 10
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 4
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (5 bullish · 3 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$135.79
Range Bottom
$157.06
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
36.4%
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
13.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
25.5%
ROA
8.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.04
Cash
$379.00M
Total Debt
$9.92B
Current Ratio
0.93
Debt/Equity
0.77
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.400 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.400 |
| 16.3.2026 | $0.400 |
| 15.3.2026 | $0.400 |
| 23.6.2025 | $0.370 |
| 22.6.2025 | $0.370 |
| 24.3.2025 | $0.370 |
| 23.3.2025 | $0.370 |
| 23.12.2024 | $0.370 |
| 22.12.2024 | $0.370 |
| 25.9.2024 | $0.370 |
| 24.9.2024 | $0.370 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$19.76
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$11.19
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
StockStory · 8.9.2026
Barchart · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Business Wire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Johnson Controls (JCI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 60/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
JCI currently scores 60/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
JCI's technical score is 57/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 99.6%; Net income growth: 93.0%; Return on equity (ROE): 25.5% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.93; Price is below the 50-day average; -3.1% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — JCI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohade Pierre E | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 3,300 | -3,300 | $147.79 |
| Schlitz Lei Zhang | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 20,917 | -20,917 | $152.98 |
| Schlitz Lei Zhang | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 2,500 | -2,500 | $153.79 |
| Schlitz Lei Zhang | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 17,517 | -20,917 | $152.98 |
| Schlitz Lei Zhang | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 15,017 | -2,500 | $153.79 |
| Schlitz Lei Zhang | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.8.2026 | 18,625 | -18,625 | $146.66 |
| Vandiepenbeeck Marc | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.8.2026 | 19,760 | -19,760 | $146.66 |
| Schlitz Lei Zhang | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.8.2026 | 38,434 | -18,625 | $146.66 |
| Vandiepenbeeck Marc | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.8.2026 | 125,861 | -19,760 | $146.66 |
| Scalia Christopher M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.7.2026 | 1,831 | -1,831 | $145.24 |
| Scalia Christopher M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.7.2026 | 2,070 | -2,070 | $145.24 |
| Scalia Christopher M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.7.2026 | 25,948 | -1,831 | $145.24 |
| Scalia Christopher M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.7.2026 | 23,878 | -2,070 | $145.24 |
| Grabowski Todd M | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 1,800 | -1,800 | $146.20 |
| Grabowski Todd M | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 26,215 | -1,800 | $146.20 |
| ESTEVES IRENE M | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 937 | +937 | — |
| ESTEVES IRENE M | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 937 | +937 | — |
| Grabowski Todd M | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 4,274 | -4,274 | $145.50 |
| Grabowski Todd M | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 28,015 | -4,274 | $145.50 |
| Schlitz Lei Zhang | Open Market Sale | 8.5.2026 | 14,701 | -14,701 | $141.55 |
| Schlitz Lei Zhang | Open Market Sale | 8.5.2026 | 48,070 | -48,070 | $141.07 |
| Schlitz Lei Zhang | Open Market Sale | 8.5.2026 | 25,138 | -25,138 | $140.51 |
| Schlitz Lei Zhang | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.5.2026 | 37,753 | +37,753 | $66.77 |
| Schlitz Lei Zhang | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.5.2026 | 25,018 | -25,018 | — |
| Schlitz Lei Zhang | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.5.2026 | 37,753 | -37,753 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
10,219,142 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 10,980,100 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology