Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$187.30
▲ $3.92 (+2.1%)
Market data updated: 09/25 05:24 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/25/2026
News analyzed: 09/25/2026
Market Cap
$6.61B
Day Range
$183.97 - $187.30
52-Week Range
$150.42 - $205.56
Beta
—
Next Earnings
19.10.2026
Support
$172.24
Resistance
$190.94
GATX is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+3.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/25 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 4.55
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
64
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
50
Value
50
Momentum
80
Risk
44
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
52
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of GATX Corporation highlights its strategic shifts and financial stability. The company announced the appointment of a new Senior Vice President and Chief Planning and Investment Officer, signaling leadership changes in strategic planning. Analysts like Citigroup maintained a Buy rating with a slightly raised price target, reflecting positive market sentiment. GATX also declared an unchanged quarterly dividend, reinforcing its commitment to shareholder returns. The Q2 2026 earnings call and related reports underscored operational updates, though no major financial surprises were noted. Overall, themes include leadership transitions, steady dividends, and cautious optimism from analysts.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about GATX Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
36
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
61
Fundamentals
52
Technical
80
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+30
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
GATX’s psychology is dominated by herding, as identical peer/stock moves (+1.3%) signal alignment rather than independent conviction. The extreme positive sentiment (100/100) contrasts with neutral technicals (RSI 48, -0.6% ROC), suggesting traders may be following peers rather than fundamentals. The anchoring bias (2.9% above support) hints at a potential psychological barrier, while the narrative-reality gap (26-point divergence) implies traders may be overestimating positive catalysts. The key question: *Is this herding driven by shared news or a collective misreading of fundamentals?*
Updated: 09/05/2026, 12:19 AM
What could change this?
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Thorstein Veblen — 60/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for GATX reveal a stark divide between those who might tolerate its speculative or cyclical nature and those who see it as fundamentally flawed or overpriced. Charles Mackay’s near-passive crowd-following approach and Thorstein Veblen’s focus on conspicuous consumption both suggest *some* interest—Mackay detects early excitement, while Veblen questions whether growth translates to profit—but neither is enthusiastic. Meanwhile, Philip Fisher’s high bar for exceptional quality and Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria outright reject GATX, with Graham’s Enterprising Investor variant calling it statistically uncheap. On the other end, Jack Schwager’s disciplined trend-following and Jesse Livermore’s contrarian trend-avoidance both warn against it, while Morgan Housel’s volatility sensitivity implies it could unsettle patient long-term holders. The middle ground—where Fisher, Marks, or Lynch see *some* merit but not enough to commit—highlights a stock that’s neither a slam dunk nor a red flag, but rather a speculative bet with mixed signals.
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 60
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 59
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 53
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 46
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 35
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 29
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 22
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 13
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 284 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$172.24
Range Bottom
$190.94
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
19.2%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
12.1%
ROA
1.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.14
Cash
$743.00M
Total Debt
$12.51B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
4.55
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.9.2026 | $0.660 |
| 15.6.2026 | $0.660 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.660 |
| 2.3.2026 | $0.660 |
| 1.3.2026 | $0.660 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.610 |
| 14.12.2025 | $0.610 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.610 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.610 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.610 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.610 |
| 28.2.2025 | $0.610 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$76.62
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$73.10
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
StockStory · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
StockStory · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
StockStory · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
CNW Group · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.8.2026
Business Wire · 5.8.2026
GATX Corporation (GATX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 64/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GATX currently scores 64/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
GATX's technical score is 80/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 4.55; -3.6% over the last 3 months relative to the index; Debt/equity: 4.55.
Yes — GATX has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phillips Geoffrey | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 301 | -500 | $178.07 |
| Phillips Geoffrey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.9.2026 | 2,501 | +2,500 | $77.07 |
| Phillips Geoffrey | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 801 | -1,700 | $177.12 |
| Phillips Geoffrey | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 1 | -300 | $179.51 |
| Phillips Geoffrey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.9.2026 | 0 | -2,500 | — |
| Phillips Geoffrey | Gift | 3.9.2026 | 1 | -6,472 | — |
| Phillips Geoffrey | Gift | 3.9.2026 | 6,472 | -6,472 | — |
| Doygun Eren | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $179.52 |
| Doygun Eren | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | — |
| Doygun Eren | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $77.07 |
| Doygun Eren | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 0 | -1,000 | — |
| Doygun Eren | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 6,323 | +1,000 | $77.07 |
| Doygun Eren | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 5,323 | -1,000 | $179.52 |
| Sbragia John | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 6,820 | -47 | $179.63 |
| Phillips Geoffrey | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 6,473 | -70 | $179.63 |
| Hillesland Kevin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 7,212 | -70 | $179.63 |
| Sbragia John | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 47 | -47 | $179.63 |
| Hillesland Kevin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 70 | -70 | $179.63 |
| Phillips Geoffrey | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 70 | -70 | $179.63 |
| Sbragia John | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.8.2026 | 0 | -1,900 | — |
| Sbragia John | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 6,867 | -1,900 | $180.40 |
| Sbragia John | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.8.2026 | 8,767 | +1,900 | $77.07 |
| Sbragia John | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 1,900 | -1,900 | $180.40 |
| Sbragia John | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.8.2026 | 1,900 | +1,900 | $77.07 |
| Sbragia John | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.8.2026 | 1,900 | -1,900 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,296,499 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 2,049,670 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
73.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 75.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology