Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Communication Services · ·
$59.15
▼ $1.19 (-2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/17 03:35 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$59
Day Range
$58.70 - $60.42
52-Week Range
$44.08 - $68.18
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
FOX is a stock from the Communication Services sector — Telecom, media, and internet/social platforms — revenue from advertising and subscriptions.
+13.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 3.17
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $50.52 vs. price $59.15 (-14.6%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
80/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
-7.2%
Median 40D Outcome
49/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
27%
+4.4% … +5.5%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.4% … -0.4%
🔴 Bearish
67%
-18.8% … -5.2%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 27% (95% CI 11%–52%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -5.1%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 33% (15%–58%) | -0.8% | -4.6% … +1.5% | +0.4% |
| 10D | 33% (15%–58%) | -2.1% | -7.1% … +2.2% | +0.7% |
| 20D | 27% (11%–52%) | -5.1% | -14.4% … +1.9% | +1.0% |
| 40D | 33% (15%–58%) | -7.2% | -14.9% … +4.6% | +2.3% |
| 60D | 47% (25%–70%) | -3.1% | -10.4% … +4.1% | +2.4% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-07 | 80/100 | Consolidation | -25.4% | -34.4% |
| 2022-03-17 | 80/100 | Consolidation | -3.2% | -21.2% |
| 2025-09-18 | 80/100 | Uptrend | -5.1% | +16.8% |
| 2026-05-28 | 77/100 | Uptrend | -22.5% | +4.0% |
| 2023-07-21 | 76/100 | Uptrend | -0.4% | -7.1% |
| 2023-08-31 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -5.4% | -7.5% |
| 2025-06-17 | 75/100 | Uptrend | +4.3% | +6.4% |
| 2021-11-15 | 74/100 | Uptrend | -12.9% | +4.2% |
| 2022-04-14 | 74/100 | Consolidation | -12.9% | -15.3% |
| 2023-05-02 | 74/100 | Consolidation | -3.7% | +2.6% |
| 2023-05-23 | 73/100 | Downtrend | +6.3% | +8.0% |
| 2026-02-02 | 73/100 | Uptrend | -19.8% | -13.3% |
| 2026-05-06 | 73/100 | Consolidation | +4.5% | -6.4% |
| 2025-07-16 | 73/100 | Consolidation | +5.3% | +3.1% |
| 2026-06-12 | 71/100 | Uptrend | -16.0% | -3.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLC (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
34
Quality
50
Value
38
Momentum
63
Risk
56
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
61
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING FOX...
Recent media coverage of Fox Corporation (Class B) has primarily centered on internal personnel changes, with reports confirming the departure of longtime Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, despite her denial of termination. Additionally, there’s focus on the company’s stock performance, including strong Q2 earnings growth (10.8% revenue increase) and analyst expectations, though valuation concerns persist amid discussions of a potential re-merger with News Corp. The coverage reflects mixed investor sentiment between short-term momentum and long-term valuation debates.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Fox Corporation (Class B). News trend score: 74. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
12
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
61
Technical
63
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+26%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+15
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests investors are herding into FOX despite relative underperformance, driven by peer alignment rather than fundamentals. The narrative-reality gap (21 points) indicates optimism may outpace tangible support, while euphoria and overconfidence persist due to valuation premiums. The key question is whether herding will sustain momentum or if negative momentum (-3.3% ROC) will trigger a re-evaluation. The absence of panic or loss aversion signals confidence in the trend, but FOMO remains muted by weak momentum.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 02:51 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Maria Bartiromo, the longtime host of Fox News and Fox Business programming, has disputed reports she was fired from the cable TV networks."
"News stock has delivered a strong 47.8% gain over the past three years, yet the current valuation checks suggest the shares lean expensive rather than offering obvious value."
"Talk of a potential re-merger with Fox..."
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 91/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for FOX reflects deep methodological contrasts. Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score highlights his focus on liquidity and resilience, suggesting the stock’s financial health could weather crises—an approach starkly different from Philip Fisher’s near-zero score, which dismisses it for lacking Fisher’s signature of long-term quality and growth. Meanwhile, Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s moderate optimism contrasts with Morgan Housel’s caution, as Nelson’s cyclical analysis sees oversold potential while Housel’s volatility concerns flag patient investors’ risks. Benjamin Graham’s mixed verdicts—one leaning neutral, the other rejecting it as too expensive—mirror the tension between strict valuation discipline and the Enterprising Investor’s willingness to accept higher risk for growth, while Howard Marks’ caution reflects skepticism about whether the stock’s strengths justify its valuation. The spread from Livermore’s neutral stance to Veblen’s outright warning underscores how some methodologies prioritize trend clarity or cultural signals over fundamentals, leaving FOX caught between bullish liquidity advocates and bearish growth skeptics.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 91
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 73
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 65
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 62
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 58
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 51
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 41
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 34
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 33
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 31
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 22
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 14
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (5 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
10.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
14.9%
ROA
7.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.91
Cash
$4.21B
Total Debt
$6.61B
Current Ratio
3.17
Debt/Equity
0.57
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 2.9.2026 | $0.290 |
| 4.3.2026 | $0.280 |
| 3.3.2026 | $0.280 |
| 3.9.2025 | $0.280 |
| 2.9.2025 | $0.280 |
| 5.3.2025 | $0.270 |
| 4.3.2025 | $0.270 |
| 4.9.2024 | $0.270 |
| 3.9.2024 | $0.270 |
| 5.3.2024 | $0.260 |
| 4.3.2024 | $0.260 |
| 29.8.2023 | $0.260 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$59.15
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$50.52
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-14.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
5.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.1% | $1.54B | $1.42B |
| 2 | 4.5% | $1.61B | $1.36B |
| 3 | 3.8% | $1.67B | $1.29B |
| 4 | 3.2% | $1.73B | $1.22B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.77B | $1.15B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.47B
Terminal Value
$27.91B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$18.14B
Enterprise Value
$24.58B
Net Debt
$2.40B
Equity Value
$22.18B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$26.49
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.64
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 8 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
StockStory · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
The Fly · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
CNBC · 4.9.2026
Fox Corporation (Class B) (FOX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FOX currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, FOX's estimated fair value is $50.52, which is 14.6% below the current price of $59.15. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
FOX's technical score is 63/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 3.17; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $50.52 vs. price $59.15 (-14.6%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -21.8%; Free cash flow growth: -51.0%.
Yes — FOX has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MURDOCH KEITH RUPERT | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 19,447 | -19,447 | $69.04 |
| MURDOCH KEITH RUPERT | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 35,841 | -35,841 | — |
| MURDOCH KEITH RUPERT | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 35,841 | +35,841 | — |
| MURDOCH LACHLAN K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 147,247 | -147,247 | — |
| MURDOCH LACHLAN K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 33,636 | -33,636 | — |
| MURDOCH LACHLAN K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 54,920 | -54,920 | — |
| MURDOCH LACHLAN K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 57,078 | -57,078 | — |
| MURDOCH LACHLAN K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 71,885 | -71,885 | $69.04 |
| MURDOCH LACHLAN K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 147,247 | +147,247 | — |
| MURDOCH LACHLAN K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 16,548 | -16,548 | $69.04 |
| MURDOCH LACHLAN K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 33,636 | +33,636 | — |
| MURDOCH LACHLAN K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 26,649 | -26,649 | $69.04 |
| MURDOCH LACHLAN K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 54,920 | +54,920 | — |
| MURDOCH LACHLAN K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 27,865 | -27,865 | $69.04 |
| MURDOCH LACHLAN K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 57,078 | +57,078 | — |
| NALLEN JOHN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 66,930 | -66,930 | — |
| NALLEN JOHN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 19,874 | -19,874 | — |
| NALLEN JOHN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 24,961 | -24,961 | — |
| NALLEN JOHN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 25,946 | -25,946 | — |
| NALLEN JOHN | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 32,592 | -32,592 | $69.04 |
| NALLEN JOHN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 66,930 | +66,930 | — |
| NALLEN JOHN | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 9,678 | -9,678 | $69.04 |
| NALLEN JOHN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 19,874 | +19,874 | — |
| NALLEN JOHN | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 11,569 | -11,569 | $69.04 |
| NALLEN JOHN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 24,961 | +24,961 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
10,401,645 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 11,129,670 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
43.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 36.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology