Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$21.33
▲ $0.36 (+1.7%)
Market data updated: 09/22 10:49 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$537.57M
Day Range
$21.12 - $21.65
52-Week Range
$18.28 - $29.61
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$20.96
Resistance
$25.13
ETD is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-26.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 2.06
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
44
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
42
Value
55
Momentum
16
Risk
48
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
58
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) has centered on its financial performance and shareholder communications. The company declared a special cash dividend in August 2026, reaffirming its strong financial position and commitment to sustainable shareholder value. Its Q4 2026 earnings call highlighted tariff recovery and plans for expanding a new design center, though it noted softer consumer demand. Additionally, CEO Doug Bergeron faced criticism over perceived self-serving board tactics, while ETD’s stock was occasionally mentioned in broader dividend and consumer discretionary stock discussions.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
35
Psychology
65
Fundamentals
58
Technical
16
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
54
Fundamental Reality
35
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests herding dominates, as ETD’s outperformance today aligns with peer trends without extreme deviation. Confirmation bias lingers due to a significant narrative-reality gap, despite weak fundamentals. The absence of panic or euphoria signals a cautious, trend-following environment. The key question remains: *Will the narrative gap persist, or will fundamentals force a re-evaluation?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 12:55 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Doug Bergeron Comments on Latest Self-Serving Tactics by Ethan Allen Board"
"Ethan Allen Declares Special Cash Dividend; Reaffirms Strong Financial Position"
"CEO reports tariff recovery and new design center expansion despite softer consumer demand"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some models seeing it as a compelling opportunity while others dismiss it outright. The highest-scoring approaches—Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cycle-based strategy (81) and Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology lens (78)—suggest it’s either near a bottom or lacks speculative frenzy, positioning it favorably for traders or contrarians. Meanwhile, disciplined value investors like Benjamin Graham (61–63) and Howard Marks (57) are lukewarm, noting it doesn’t meet deep-discount or fundamental premium thresholds, though Marks acknowledges a solid business. At the other extreme, Fisher (9), Lynch (8), and Housel (2) outright reject it, citing missing growth traits or excessive volatility—reflecting a stark contrast between those prioritizing momentum/contrarianism and those demanding proven quality or patience. Even technical traders like Jack Schwager (66) see a disciplined setup, but it’s far less enthusiastic than the top-tier cycle-based or crowd-avoidance models.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 90
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 66
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 66
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 49
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 46
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 45
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 15
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 14
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 9
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 8
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 284 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
61.2%
Operating Margin
7.8%
Net Margin
6.9%
EBITDA Margin
10.4%
ROE
8.5%
ROA
5.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.56
Cash
$73.63M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.06
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 3.9.2026 | $3.000 |
| 12.8.2026 | $0.640 |
| 13.5.2026 | $0.390 |
| 12.5.2026 | $0.390 |
| 11.2.2026 | $0.390 |
| 10.2.2026 | $0.390 |
| 12.11.2025 | $0.390 |
| 11.11.2025 | $0.390 |
| 13.8.2025 | $0.640 |
| 12.8.2025 | $0.640 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.390 |
| 14.5.2025 | $0.390 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$21.33
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$21.40
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+0.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $39.36M | $36.11M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $38.13M | $32.10M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $37.66M | $29.08M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $37.89M | $26.84M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $38.84M | $25.24M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$41.44M
Terminal Value
$612.48M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$398.07M
Enterprise Value
$547.45M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$547.45M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$18.43
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$16.67
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Business Wire · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.8.2026
Business Wire · 20.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 19.8.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
Zacks · 19.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
Yahoo · 8.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 5.8.2026
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 44/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ETD currently scores 44/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ETD's estimated fair value is $21.40, which is 0.3% above the current price of $21.33. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ETD's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 2.06; Gross margin: 61.2% — strong; P/E: 13.7.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: -0.22 (3y annualized return -10.2% / max drawdown 46.0%); Revenue growth (last year): -5.7%.
Yes — ETD has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KATHWARI M FAROOQ | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 266 | -266 | $25.04 |
| KATHWARI M FAROOQ | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 266 | -266 | $25.04 |
| KATHWARI M FAROOQ | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 265 | -265 | $25.04 |
| KATHWARI M FAROOQ | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 266 | -266 | $25.04 |
| KATHWARI M FAROOQ | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 22,811 | -22,811 | $25.04 |
| KATHWARI M FAROOQ | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 3,272 | -3,272 | $23.51 |
| Phillips Amy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 417 | -417 | $23.51 |
| McNulty Matthew J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 239 | -239 | $23.51 |
| KATHWARI M FAROOQ | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 1,488,341 | -3,272 | $23.51 |
| McNulty Matthew J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 19,245 | -239 | $23.51 |
| Phillips Amy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 22,477 | -417 | $23.51 |
| KATHWARI M FAROOQ | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.8.2026 | 3,890 | -3,890 | $23.71 |
| McNulty Matthew J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.8.2026 | 284 | -284 | $23.71 |
| Phillips Amy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.8.2026 | 496 | -496 | $23.71 |
| McNulty Matthew J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.8.2026 | 19,484 | -284 | $23.71 |
| Phillips Amy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.8.2026 | 22,894 | -496 | $23.71 |
| KATHWARI M FAROOQ | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.8.2026 | 1,491,613 | -3,890 | $23.71 |
| KATHWARI M FAROOQ | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.8.2026 | 3,948 | -3,948 | $23.51 |
| Phillips Amy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.8.2026 | 504 | -504 | $23.51 |
| McNulty Matthew J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.8.2026 | 288 | -288 | $23.51 |
| KATHWARI M FAROOQ | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.8.2026 | 1,495,503 | -3,948 | $23.51 |
| Phillips Amy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.8.2026 | 23,390 | -504 | $23.51 |
| McNulty Matthew J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.8.2026 | 19,768 | -288 | $23.51 |
| KATHWARI M FAROOQ | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 16,223 | +16,223 | — |
| Sable David M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 1,306 | +1,306 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,976,116 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,252,569 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 50.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology