Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$48.61
▼ $0.11 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/19 08:01 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$53.47B
Day Range
$48.18 - $49.00
52-Week Range
$31.47 - $52.71
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$41.81
Resistance
$51.70
DVN is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+38.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/25 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.98
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
86/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
92/100
Analog Quality
-5.4%
Median 40D Outcome
41/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
33%
+7.3% … +16.2%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.4% … -0.4%
🔴 Bearish
60%
-10.8% … -6.0%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 33% (95% CI 15%–58%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -4.6%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
7 occurrence(s) · 29% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
2 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.7% | -4.6% … +2.9% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 20% (7%–45%) | -1.7% | -5.4% … +0.6% | +0.4% |
| 20D | 33% (15%–58%) | -4.6% | -8.4% … +6.3% | +1.4% |
| 40D | 40% (20%–64%) | -5.4% | -9.4% … +6.7% | +0.8% |
| 60D | 47% (25%–70%) | -8.1% | -17.0% … +6.2% | -0.1% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-19 | 86/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +5.3% | +36.1% |
| 2018-08-02 | 86/100 | Uptrend | -1.8% | -26.3% |
| 2026-01-20 | 86/100 | Consolidation | +22.5% | +26.2% |
| 2018-01-29 | 85/100 | Uptrend | -26.5% | -18.8% |
| 2018-07-18 | 84/100 | Uptrend | -7.5% | -17.6% |
| 2018-06-18 | 84/100 | Uptrend | +7.3% | +2.1% |
| 2026-03-10 | 83/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +9.6% | +5.2% |
| 2022-11-08 | 83/100 | High Volatility | -10.8% | -16.5% |
| 2024-05-06 | 83/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -8.3% | -11.4% |
| 2026-05-12 | 83/100 | Consolidation | -0.4% | -8.1% |
| 2018-09-12 | 82/100 | Consolidation | -11.1% | -35.2% |
| 2026-04-10 | 80/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -4.6% | -9.4% |
| 2025-09-18 | 78/100 | Uptrend | -8.5% | +7.2% |
| 2025-10-06 | 78/100 | Consolidation | -6.0% | +4.9% |
| 2026-02-24 | 77/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +16.2% | +12.0% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
61
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
55
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING DVN...
Recent media coverage of Devon Energy has centered on its strong stock performance and positive analyst sentiment. The company’s shares have surged roughly **16-17% since its last earnings report**, sparking speculation about sustained momentum. Analysts, including Seaport Global, have initiated coverage with a **"Buy"** rating and a **$65 price target**, while Goldman Sachs highlighted Devon as a standout dividend-paying energy stock amid sector gains. The focus remains on earnings potential and market positioning amid broader energy sector volatility.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Devon Energy. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
48
Fundamentals
55
Technical
61
Valuation
55
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+15%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+25
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a dominant *herding* dynamic, where traders follow peer performance rather than fundamentals. The narrative gap (64 vs. 38) implies optimism outpaces tangible evidence, while anchoring near resistance may limit upside. Weak momentum (-0.3% ROC) and neutral volume (1.02x) temper euphoria, but positive sentiment (100/100) keeps traders aligned. The key question: will peer momentum sustain alignment, or will resistance break to reveal deeper sentiment?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:51 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Seaport Global initiates coverage of Devon Energy (DVN) at Buy"
"Devon Energy (DVN) reported earnings 30 days ago... Up 16.5% Since Last Earnings Report"
"Goldman Sachs noted... investors can still find attractive dividend-paying opportunities in energy... Devon Energy"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 71/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each investor, the model estimates that Smith’s high score of 71 drives a strong buy‑and‑hold view, while Livermore’s moderate 58 and Graham’s 57 produce mixed or neutral verdicts, reflecting their focus on clear trends and margin of safety. The efficient‑market view of Malkiel & Bogle and the crowd‑sentiment lens of Mackay both sit near the mid‑range (53), leading to cautious, mixed conclusions about out‑performance versus index replication. In contrast, Fisher, Marks, Loeb, and the later‑cycle thinkers score below 40, triggering warnings about growth quality, valuation risk, and cycle position, which explains their more defensive or outright negative stances. Overall, the spread from high to low scores illustrates how differing emphasis on long‑term fundamentals, market cycles, and risk assessment yields divergent recommendations for DVN.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 68
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 59
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 58
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 52
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 45
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 40
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 34
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 34
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 25
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 24
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (5 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
15.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
17.0%
ROA
8.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.18
Cash
$1.38B
Total Debt
$8.39B
Current Ratio
0.98
Debt/Equity
0.54
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.320 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.320 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.240 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.240 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.240 |
| 14.12.2025 | $0.240 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.240 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.240 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.240 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.240 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.240 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.240 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$24.53
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$23.34
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 6 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
CNBC · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
CNBC · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Zacks · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 15.9.2026
Devon Energy (DVN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DVN currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
DVN's technical score is 61/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 52.8 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.98; Calmar: -0.01 (3y annualized return -0.3% / max drawdown 50.8%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -8.6%.
Yes — DVN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JORDEN THOMAS E | Gift | 1.7.2026 | 7,684 | +7,684 | — |
| JORDEN THOMAS E | Gift | 1.7.2026 | 7,684 | -7,684 | — |
| JORDEN THOMAS E | Gift | 1.7.2026 | 0 | -7,684 | — |
| JORDEN THOMAS E | Gift | 1.7.2026 | 2,416,436 | +7,684 | — |
| Shellebarger Jeffrey Earle | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5,567 | +5,567 | — |
| SMOLIK BRENT J | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5,567 | +5,567 | — |
| JORDEN THOMAS E | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 7,684 | +7,684 | — |
| Kurz Karl F | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5,567 | +5,567 | — |
| WATTS MARCUS A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5,567 | +5,567 | — |
| KINDICK KELT | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5,567 | +5,567 | — |
| Hernandez Jacinto J | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5,567 | +5,567 | — |
| Brock Amanda M | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5,567 | +5,567 | — |
| Williams Valerie | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5,567 | +5,567 | — |
| Fox Ann G | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5,567 | +5,567 | — |
| Williams Valerie | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 52,034 | +5,567 | — |
| JORDEN THOMAS E | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 7,684 | +7,684 | — |
| WATTS MARCUS A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 61,301 | +5,567 | — |
| SMOLIK BRENT J | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 12,662 | +5,567 | — |
| Shellebarger Jeffrey Earle | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 12,082 | +5,567 | — |
| Kurz Karl F | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 94,315 | +5,567 | — |
| Hernandez Jacinto J | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 12,368 | +5,567 | — |
| Brock Amanda M | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 61,301 | +5,567 | — |
| Fox Ann G | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 49,243 | +5,567 | — |
| KINDICK KELT | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 37,368 | +5,567 | — |
| DEVON ENERGY CORP/DE | Conversion of Derivative Security | 22.6.2026 | 1,755,174 | +1,755,174 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
27,478,794 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 30,197,210 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology