Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$132.36
▲ $8.73 (+7.1%)
Market data updated: 09/24 11:58 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/24/2026
News analyzed: 09/24/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$130.01 - $134.50
52-Week Range
$120.15 - $244.38
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$120.15
Resistance
$222.71
DKS is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-39.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 28.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $91.95 vs. price $132.36 (-30.5%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
44
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
11d ago · $135.03
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -8 to 26 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
42
Value
43
Momentum
30
Risk
40
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
55
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Dick’s Sporting Goods has primarily focused on a securities fraud class action lawsuit filed against the company and its executives. The lawsuit alleges investors were misled about the Foot Locker acquisition, particularly regarding inventory issues and integration challenges, raising concerns over financial and reputational risks. While other sources mention general market trends or unrelated dividend updates, the dominant theme is the legal controversy tied to the acquisition’s disclosures.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Dick's Sporting Goods Inc. News trend score: 68. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
55
Technical
30
Valuation
43
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-44%
Market Narrative
58
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+22
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant loss aversion—driven by a steep 38.4% drop over three months—suggests investors are prioritizing cutting losses over further downside. Overconfidence in valuation (+44% DCF premium) contrasts with weak momentum, indicating some traders may cling to upside expectations despite technical weakness. The narrow narrative gap (-3) implies a subtle disconnect between market sentiment and fundamentals, but the primary focus remains on preserving capital. The key question is whether volume will rise if a catalyst emerges to test whether this is a consolidation or a deeper pullback.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 11:14 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Plaintiffs claim public statements about the acquisition's impact did not accurately reflect operational challenges."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Howard Marks (Market Cycle) — 91/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits methodologies into two starkly opposing camps: the cyclical and contrarian investors see DKS as a compelling opportunity, while the value, quality, and risk-averse strategists overwhelmingly dismiss it. Howard Marks (Market Cycle) and Samuel Armstrong Nelson both rate it near-perfectly, viewing it as undervalued in an early-to-mid cycle or oversold territory, while Edgar Lawrence Smith and Jack Schwager praise its long-term fundamentals and disciplined setup. In contrast, Benjamin Graham and his defensive criteria—alongside Fisher, Lynch, and Loeb—reject DKS for failing quality thresholds, overpaying for growth, or exposing investors to unacceptable risk. Even the passive efficient-market camp and Morgan Housel’s volatility-focused approach flag it as a poor fit, suggesting it’s either overpriced or too volatile for patient, low-cost index investors. The divide hinges on whether DKS’s cyclical positioning or business model justifies its valuation against traditional value or risk metrics.
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 91
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 79
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 78
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 56
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 41
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 40
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 38
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 37
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 35
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 28
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 284 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
32.9%
Operating Margin
6.4%
Net Margin
4.9%
EBITDA Margin
9.2%
ROE
15.3%
ROA
4.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$10.22
Cash
$1.35B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.53
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.9.2026 | $1.250 |
| 12.6.2026 | $1.250 |
| 11.6.2026 | $1.250 |
| 27.3.2026 | $1.250 |
| 26.3.2026 | $1.250 |
| 12.12.2025 | $1.213 |
| 11.12.2025 | $1.213 |
| 12.9.2025 | $1.213 |
| 11.9.2025 | $1.213 |
| 13.6.2025 | $1.213 |
| 12.6.2025 | $1.213 |
| 28.3.2025 | $1.213 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$132.36
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$91.95
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-30.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
12.2%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.2% | $448.95M | $411.88M |
| 2 | 9.8% | $492.81M | $414.79M |
| 3 | 7.3% | $529.01M | $408.49M |
| 4 | 4.9% | $555.05M | $393.21M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $568.93M | $369.76M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$400.17M
Terminal Value
$8.97B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.83B
Enterprise Value
$7.83B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$7.83B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$65.07
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$45.89
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 9 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Benzinga · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Fintel · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc (DKS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 44/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DKS currently scores 44/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DKS's estimated fair value is $91.95, which is 30.5% below the current price of $132.36. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DKS's technical score is 30/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 28.1%; Current ratio: 1.53; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $91.95 vs. price $132.36 (-30.5%); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.1% of price.
Yes — DKS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 11 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baran Elizabeth H. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2026 | 68 | -68 | $139.77 |
| COLOMBO WILLIAM J | Open Market Purchase | 1.9.2026 | 913 | +913 | $133.19 |
| Barrenechea Mark J | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 25,977 | +17,000 | $130.72 |
| COLOMBO WILLIAM J | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 180,087 | +1,100 | $129.00 |
| Barrenechea Mark J | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 17,000 | +17,000 | $130.72 |
| COLOMBO WILLIAM J | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 1,100 | +1,100 | $129.00 |
| Eddy Robert W. | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 10,886 | +4,000 | $128.70 |
| COLOMBO WILLIAM J | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 178,987 | +5,000 | $128.72 |
| MATHRANI SANDEEP | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 11,136 | +1,550 | $128.89 |
| MATHRANI SANDEEP | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 1,550 | +1,550 | $128.89 |
| COLOMBO WILLIAM J | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $128.72 |
| Eddy Robert W. | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 4,000 | +4,000 | $128.70 |
| STACK EDWARD W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 958,466 | -958,466 | — |
| STACK EDWARD W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 958,466 | +958,466 | $11.31 |
| STACK EDWARD W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.6.2026 | 442,692 | -442,692 | $236.93 |
| STACK EDWARD W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 7,524,914 | +958,466 | $11.31 |
| STACK EDWARD W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.6.2026 | 7,082,222 | -442,692 | $236.93 |
| STACK EDWARD W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 0 | -958,466 | — |
| Fink Anne | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 838 | +838 | — |
| Eddy Robert W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 838 | +838 | — |
| Barrenechea Mark J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 838 | +838 | — |
| COLOMBO WILLIAM J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 838 | +838 | — |
| Ralls-Morrison Desiree | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 838 | +838 | — |
| MATHRANI SANDEEP | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 838 | +838 | — |
| CHIRICO EMANUEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 838 | +838 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,174,075 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 7,478,420 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology