Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$194.25
▲ $20.28 (+11.7%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:35 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$177.67 - $196.21
52-Week Range
$139.11 - $402.16
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$139.11
Resistance
$196.21
COIN is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
-43.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.49
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
84/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
-10.1%
Median 40D Outcome
0/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+13.1% … +49.6%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
47%
-24.2% … -15.7%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.7%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
4 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 27% (11%–52%) | -4.9% | -12.3% … +3.3% | -0.4% |
| 10D | 33% (15%–58%) | -5.3% | -14.4% … +9.3% | -0.4% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.7% | -18.5% … +25.8% | -2.3% |
| 40D | 40% (20%–64%) | -10.1% | -22.2% … +38.9% | -2.9% |
| 60D | 47% (25%–70%) | -1.0% | -23.8% … +27.8% | -1.5% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 84/100 | High Volatility | -24.6% | -29.9% |
| 2026-04-22 | 77/100 | High Volatility | -7.2% | -22.2% |
| 2023-05-31 | 76/100 | High Volatility | +16.4% | +19.4% |
| 2023-04-11 | 75/100 | High Volatility | -14.2% | +12.2% |
| 2023-06-26 | 75/100 | High Volatility | +57.7% | +23.8% |
| 2026-03-19 | 72/100 | ✓ High Volatility | +1.7% | -16.4% |
| 2025-05-12 | 72/100 | Consolidation | +23.0% | +50.0% |
| 2023-10-24 | 71/100 | Uptrend | +28.5% | +56.2% |
| 2023-03-16 | 71/100 | ✓ High Volatility | +3.1% | -25.4% |
| 2024-10-14 | 70/100 | High Volatility | +65.1% | +31.8% |
| 2026-03-04 | 69/100 | ✓ High Volatility | -17.2% | -9.5% |
| 2025-01-24 | 68/100 | High Volatility | -23.8% | -36.2% |
| 2024-10-30 | 68/100 | High Volatility | +46.9% | +37.4% |
| 2026-05-29 | 68/100 | High Volatility | -19.8% | -1.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | 67/100 | Downtrend | -44.9% | -31.8% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLF (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $194.25
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 12 to 47 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $191.45
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 1 to 34 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $191.45
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 0 to 33 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
11d ago · $178.94
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 43 to 17 day-over-day
What happened after
16d ago · $192.70
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 58)
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 23, 2026
Then
64
$186.49
Now
63
$194.25
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
47
Value
45
Momentum
82
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
61
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING COIN...
Recent media coverage of Coinbase has primarily focused on its expansion into Canada by launching 23 regulated perpetual and dated futures contracts for Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL), aligning with CEO Eric Richmond’s push for a broader "everything exchange" platform. The news highlights Coinbase’s strategic move to deepen its derivatives offerings in new markets, though broader industry trends—like the upcoming CLARITY Act vote and Circle Arc’s mainnet launch—dominate related discussions. No direct Coinbase-specific controversies or financial struggles are highlighted in these sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Coinbase. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
44
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
80
Fundamentals
61
Technical
82
Valuation
45
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+19%
Market Narrative
76
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+40
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests **herding** is dominant, as COIN’s underperformance relative to peers (-3.1% vs. -1.4%) aligns with traders adjusting positions to match broader trends. FOMO (23) and overconfidence (15) linger due to positive momentum (+5.5% ROC) and positive sentiment (74/100), but these are muted by the narrative gap (24) between optimistic expectations (60) and reality (36). The key question is whether traders will double down on herding or pivot if momentum stalls. The low panic/selling score (3) indicates no imminent liquidation pressure, but the gap hints at potential dissonance if fundamentals diverge further from price action.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 08:11 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Hunter Biden wants to help investors who lost money on Trump’s memecoin"
"Coinbase has launched 23 regulated perpetual and dated futures contracts for eligible Canadian clients, including contracts tied to Bitcoin, Ether, and Solana"
"The CLARITY Act is currently functioning as a legislative elevator stuck between floors"
"Tesla, Coinbase, and CRISPR lead her 'Rapid Real Growth' thesis as 5 tech platforms transform global GDP"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 81/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for COIN reflects deep methodological contrasts: Bagehot’s high score (81) highlights its liquidity resilience—ideal for his credit-squeeze playbook—while Fisher (40) and Lynch (29) dismiss it outright for lacking the growth or valuation edge they demand. Marks (54) and Loeb (48) strike a cautious middle, wary of overvaluation or risk, whereas Livermore (71) sees a clear upward trend, aligning with his technical momentum focus. Meanwhile, Graham (34) and Veblen (16) flag fundamental flaws—defensive metrics failing or signaling speculative excess—while efficient-market theorists (47) question any edge over passive indexing. The spectrum spans from Bagehot’s liquidity-driven optimism to Veblen’s skepticism of unearned growth, illustrating how even high-scoring methodologies clash with others’ core priorities.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 81
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 55
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 51
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 44
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 43
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 40
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 34
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 32
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 29
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 16
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 13
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 2 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
20.0%
Net Margin
17.6%
EBITDA Margin
22.6%
ROE
8.5%
ROA
4.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.85
Cash
$11.29B
Total Debt
$7.21B
Current Ratio
2.34
Debt/Equity
0.49
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$51.51
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$32.12
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
ChartMill · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Coinbase (COIN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
COIN currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
COIN's technical score is 82/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.49; Current ratio: 2.34; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 6.5% of price; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -53.1%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for COIN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreessen Marc L | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 13,676 | -13,676 | $181.14 |
| WILSON FREDERICK R | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 1,183 | -1,183 | $179.99 |
| WILSON FREDERICK R | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 992 | -992 | $182.57 |
| WILSON FREDERICK R | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 900 | -900 | $176.12 |
| WILSON FREDERICK R | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 3,397 | -3,397 | $177.09 |
| WILSON FREDERICK R | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 808 | -808 | $181.92 |
| WILSON FREDERICK R | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 1,403 | -1,403 | $178.28 |
| WILSON FREDERICK R | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 1,317 | -1,317 | $180.77 |
| Armstrong Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,806 | +1,806 | — |
| Armstrong Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 3,110 | +3,110 | — |
| Jones Jennifer N. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 2,062 | -2,062 | $188.75 |
| Jones Jennifer N. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 0 | -2,062 | $188.75 |
| Davies Christa | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 3,827 | +748 | — |
| HAAS ALESIA J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 384,406 | -8,339 | $160.20 |
| HAAS ALESIA J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 24,607 | -4,101 | — |
| HAAS ALESIA J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 381,797 | +5,869 | — |
| Davies Christa | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 3,770 | -57 | $160.20 |
| HAAS ALESIA J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 5,869 | -5,869 | — |
| HAAS ALESIA J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 392,745 | +6,847 | — |
| Davies Christa | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 748 | -748 | — |
| HAAS ALESIA J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 68,463 | -6,847 | — |
| HAAS ALESIA J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 385,898 | +4,101 | — |
| Choi Emilie | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 577,740 | +10,143 | — |
| Choi Emilie | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 586,159 | +8,419 | — |
| Choi Emilie | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 11,738 | -11,738 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
27,378,540 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 21,790,827 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology