Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$235.18
▲ $7.90 (+3.5%)
Market data updated: 09/16 05:47 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$14.77B
Day Range
$230.00 - $236.56
52-Week Range
$226.85 - $378.33
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
BURL is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-12.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 21.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $36.68 vs. price $235.18 (-84.4%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (76/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
76
Quality
50
Value
38
Momentum
6
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
65
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Burlington Stores has centered on its stock performance and investor sentiment following its second-quarter results. The company’s shares have declined over 30% since July, partly due to cautious guidance, though it raised its full-year earnings forecast. Analysts debate whether the stock is undervalued or a bargain, with mixed calls—some recommending buying while others highlight oversold conditions. No major operational or strategic shifts were highlighted in the sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Burlington Stores, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 15 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
35
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
91
Fundamentals
65
Technical
6
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
-30%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+27
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant panic selling—evidenced by extreme oversold conditions (RSI 20), sharp momentum collapse (-21.4%), and elevated volume—suggests a defensive, risk-off posture. The narrative gap (26 points) implies traders are overestimating positive catalysts relative to deteriorating fundamentals. Key uncertainty lies in whether sentiment (98/100) can sustain panic or if it will pivot to loss aversion as declines persist. The absence of herding and anchoring reinforces individual, reactive selling rather than coordinated behavior. Overconfidence persists despite divergence, hinting at delayed recognition of valuation extremes.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:43 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Adjusted earnings per share jumped 38% to $2.37 [...] the off-price retailer’s growth engine is still running hot"
"stripped out a $55 million tariff refund the company chose to plow back into customer prices rather than pocket"
"strong results meet cautious guidance"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for BURL reflects deep methodological contrasts between growth-oriented and value-driven investors. At the top, Nelson and Schwager see strong technical or cyclical tailwinds—Nelson’s near-oversold signal and Schwager’s disciplined reward/risk setup suggest they’d prioritize momentum or relative positioning. Meanwhile, Marks (cycle) and Veblen lean toward a more nuanced bullishness, aligning with early-stage growth or intrinsic value creation, though their scores trail the top tier. On the flip side, Fisher’s low score and Graham’s near-zero verdict highlight a fundamental mismatch: Fisher demands unmistakable quality/growth, while Graham’s rigid defensive criteria reject the stock outright. The middle ground—Lynch’s caution, Mackay’s crowd skepticism, and even Marks’ risk flag—shows a tension between perceived growth and valuation overhang, while the bottom half (Loeb, Bagehot, Graham) warns of liquidity, volatility, or outright mispricing risks. The debate thus hinges on whether BURL’s profile fits speculative momentum (top scores) or disciplined value (bottom scores), with no clear consensus.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 70
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 56
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 33
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 33
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 21
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 18
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 16
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 13
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 4
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
43.9%
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
5.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
33.8%
ROA
6.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.69
Cash
$1.23B
Total Debt
$2.08B
Current Ratio
1.23
Debt/Equity
1.15
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$235.18
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$36.68
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-84.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $188.67M | $173.09M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $203.94M | $171.65M |
| 3 | 6.2% | $216.64M | $167.29M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $226.10M | $160.17M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $231.75M | $150.62M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$171.59M
Terminal Value
$3.65B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.38B
Enterprise Value
$3.20B
Net Debt
$845.75M
Equity Value
$2.35B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$28.18
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$27.45
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 15 positive, 4 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 6.9.2026
Barrons.com · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
TheStreet · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
MarketBeat · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BURL currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BURL's estimated fair value is $36.68, which is 84.4% below the current price of $235.18. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BURL's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 21.9%; Free cash flow growth: 1108.9%; Net income growth: 21.1%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $36.68 vs. price $235.18 (-84.4%); ATR: 4.5% of price; Calmar: 0.49 (3y annualized return 19.0% / max drawdown 38.9%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BURL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 23 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 136 | -136 | $260.76 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 186 | -186 | $262.09 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 118 | -118 | $264.20 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 212 | -212 | $254.54 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 162 | -162 | $257.16 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 440 | -440 | $263.62 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 307 | -307 | $255.94 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 117 | -117 | $258.57 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 847 | -847 | $368.44 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 147 | -147 | $371.58 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 145 | -145 | $369.26 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 161 | -161 | $372.79 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 378 | -378 | $367.72 |
| Wolfe Kristin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 216 | -216 | $368.23 |
| Wolfe Kristin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 26,676 | -216 | $368.23 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 78,961 | -378 | $367.72 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 78,114 | -847 | $368.44 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 77,969 | -145 | $369.26 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 77,822 | -147 | $371.58 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 77,661 | -161 | $372.79 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 49 | -49 | $319.02 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 210 | -210 | $318.23 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 84 | -84 | $310.10 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 443 | -443 | $315.64 |
| Vecchio Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 520 | -520 | $316.51 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,983,251 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,715,459 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology