Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$57.73
▼ $0.45 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:34 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$403.69B
Day Range
$57.52 - $58.23
52-Week Range
$46.12 - $65.23
Beta
—
Next Earnings
14.10.2026
Support
$57.18
Resistance
$65.23
BAC is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
+10.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/25 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is above the 200-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 2.33
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
85/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
92/100
Analog Quality
+4.6%
Median 40D Outcome
72/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
60%
+2.3% … +10.3%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.3% … +0.5%
🔴 Bearish
27%
-2.3% … -1.3%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 60% (95% CI 36%–80%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.7%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
12 occurrence(s) · 58% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.7% | -1.3% … +4.4% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.6% | -2.3% … +5.1% | +0.9% |
| 20D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.7% | -0.9% … +8.6% | +1.3% |
| 40D | 67% (42%–85%) | +4.6% | -0.3% … +7.5% | +3.5% |
| 60D | 67% (42%–85%) | +3.9% | +0.5% … +12.7% | +3.8% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-26 | 85/100 | Downtrend | +10.3% | +3.9% |
| 2018-03-28 | 84/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +2.3% | -1.4% |
| 2019-05-15 | 83/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -1.2% | +0.1% |
| 2021-06-18 | 82/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -4.8% | +2.7% |
| 2018-10-15 | 81/100 | Downtrend | -0.6% | -6.8% |
| 2026-01-20 | 81/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +2.4% | +2.7% |
| 2018-05-31 | 81/100 | Consolidation | -1.3% | +6.4% |
| 2017-09-08 | 81/100 | Downtrend | +14.5% | +27.0% |
| 2021-12-01 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +1.6% | +0.8% |
| 2019-08-07 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +0.8% | +12.1% |
| 2021-07-16 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +9.8% | +15.5% |
| 2025-02-25 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -1.5% | -1.6% |
| 2024-01-18 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +7.4% | +13.3% |
| 2026-05-14 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +12.4% | +28.4% |
| 2024-08-01 | 77/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +1.7% | +6.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLF (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $58.26
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 7 to 36 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
10d ago · $62.57
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -15 to 12 day-over-day
What happened after
28d ago · $61.69
Evidence: 11 insider open-market buy(s) in the last 30 days
What happened after
28d ago · $61.69
Evidence: 3 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
30d ago · $63.17
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
30d ago · $63.17
Evidence: 7 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $63.96
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
31d ago · $63.96
Evidence: 7 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
58
$63.79
Now
45
$57.73
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
26
Risk
44
Sentiment
26
Fundamental
57
Institutional
47
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING BAC...
Recent media coverage of Bank of America has focused on its strategic investments and market outlook, particularly its bullish stance on SK hynix amid a tight memory chip market. Analysts also highlight concerns about rising interest rates through its preferred stocks, while broader economic themes—like bond performance and state economic comparisons—indirectly frame financial trends. Additionally, the bank has emphasized community support ahead of the 25th anniversary of 9/11, pledging aid to veterans and first responders. No major operational or financial crises were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Bank of America. News trend score: 26. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 5 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
35
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
81
Fundamentals
57
Technical
26
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+3%
Market Narrative
27
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
-11
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
BAC’s psychology is fragmented, with no dominant state but notable **anchoring** (26) and **herding** (39) signals. The stock’s slight underperformance relative to peers (AFL/ALL/AXP) aligns with herding dynamics, while proximity to support (3.7%) may anchor traders’ decisions. The narrative-reality gap (12) hints at a disconnect between market expectations and fundamentals, but low volatility and neutral momentum prevent extreme bias. The key question: Will traders hold near support, or will peer weakness drag BAC further?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:17 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"A $240 price target implies nearly 65% upside, but debt rating agencies warn a $42 billion cash drain looms ahead."
"Strong earnings momentum, a solid capital cushion and ample buyback capacity are underpinning BAC's shareholder-return strategy."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 32/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, Charles Mackay’s model rates BAC 80, seeing no crowd mania, while value‑oriented analysts such as Graham and Graham‑Enterprising give modest to low scores (52 and 27) because the stock fails key cheapness tests. Growth‑focused thinkers like Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher assign mid‑range scores (60 and 58) reflecting decent growth that is already priced in, and Howard Marks and his cycle view hover around the middle of the cycle, indicating mixed expectations. Trend‑trader Jesse Livermore and Jack Schwager, who prioritize clear price momentum, rate the stock negatively (42 and 25), whereas broader‑market advocates like Malkiel/Bogle see only weak evidence to beat an index (48). Overall, the spread from high to low scores stems from each methodology’s emphasis—behavioral sentiment, valuation safety margins, growth pricing, or technical trend—leading to divergent yet internally consistent conclusions.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 93
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 73
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 58
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 58
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 58
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 55
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 45
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 39
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 32
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 9 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$57.18
Range Bottom
$65.23
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
32.6%
Net Margin
29.0%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.1%
ROA
0.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.86
Cash
$231.84B
Total Debt
$317.82B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
2.33
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 4.9.2026 | $0.320 |
| 5.6.2026 | $0.280 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.280 |
| 6.3.2026 | $0.280 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.280 |
| 5.12.2025 | $0.280 |
| 4.12.2025 | $0.280 |
| 5.9.2025 | $0.280 |
| 4.9.2025 | $0.280 |
| 6.6.2025 | $0.260 |
| 5.6.2025 | $0.260 |
| 7.3.2025 | $0.260 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$42.04
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$41.79
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 6 neutral, 9 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
CNBC · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
CNBC · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Bank of America (BAC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BAC currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
BAC's technical score is 26/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 200-day average; +0.8% over the last 3 months relative to the index; Operating margin: 32.6% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 2.33; Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — BAC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 9 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Other Transaction | 28.8.2026 | 100 | +100 | — |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Other Transaction | 24.8.2026 | 1,250 | -1,250 | — |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Other Transaction | 24.8.2026 | 150 | -150 | — |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 100 | -100 | $7.36 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2026 | 100 | +100 | $7.45 |
| MOYNIHAN BRIAN T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 18,083 | -18,083 | — |
| MOYNIHAN BRIAN T | Disposition to the Company | 15.8.2026 | 18,083 | -18,083 | $64.49 |
| MOYNIHAN BRIAN T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 18,083 | +18,083 | — |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 322 | -322 | $12.32 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 4,797 | -4,797 | $12.32 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 4,797 | -4,797 | $12.32 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 322 | -322 | $12.32 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 751 | -751 | $12.32 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 322 | +322 | $12.29 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 751 | -751 | $12.32 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 500 | -500 | $12.32 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 500 | -500 | $12.32 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 751 | +751 | $12.29 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 4,797 | +4,797 | $12.29 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 500 | +500 | $12.29 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 322 | +322 | $12.29 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 500 | +500 | $12.29 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 751 | +751 | $12.29 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 4,797 | +4,797 | $12.29 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 1 | -1 | $10.23 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
82,250,230 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 100,510,154 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
44.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 44.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology