Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$239.48
▼ $1.93 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:56 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$61.38B
Day Range
$238.75 - $241.93
52-Week Range
$190.75 - $313.55
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$238.75
Resistance
$272.79
AJG is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
-19.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 20.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $109.02 vs. price $239.48 (-54.5%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
75/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
88/100
Analog Quality
+6.8%
Median 40D Outcome
71/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
67%
+3.1% … +7.2%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.7% … -0.7%
🔴 Bearish
27%
-8.0% … -5.6%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 67% (95% CI 42%–85%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +3.0%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
6 occurrence(s) · 67% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | +1.0% | -1.7% … +3.4% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.5% | -2.9% … +3.6% | +1.0% |
| 20D | 67% (42%–85%) | +3.0% | -1.8% … +7.1% | +1.9% |
| 40D | 60% (36%–80%) | +6.8% | -3.6% … +13.5% | +3.3% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +10.1% | -11.7% … +16.7% | +5.0% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-24 | 75/100 | Downtrend | -10.4% | -10.8% |
| 2022-05-13 | 71/100 | Consolidation | -6.4% | +14.4% |
| 2025-06-17 | 69/100 | Consolidation | -0.7% | -6.0% |
| 2024-12-19 | 69/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +5.2% | +19.8% |
| 2026-01-29 | 67/100 | Downtrend | -7.2% | -12.5% |
| 2023-12-22 | 66/100 | Consolidation | +7.3% | +12.3% |
| 2025-08-08 | 66/100 | Downtrend | +3.3% | -16.1% |
| 2025-04-29 | 64/100 | Consolidation | +7.1% | -0.6% |
| 2022-06-16 | 63/100 | Downtrend | +8.6% | +24.0% |
| 2024-04-15 | 60/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +7.5% | +16.4% |
| 2022-09-28 | 60/100 | Consolidation | +3.0% | +10.1% |
| 2025-11-18 | 60/100 | Downtrend | -3.0% | -17.3% |
| 2026-05-07 | 60/100 | Downtrend | +7.0% | +22.8% |
| 2022-06-01 | 59/100 | Consolidation | +1.6% | +16.9% |
| 2025-09-17 | 59/100 | Downtrend | +1.2% | -15.4% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLF (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
60
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🔎 What Changed (vs. 30 days ago)
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
25d ago · $268.64
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
25d ago · $271.99
Evidence: תבנית שמתאימה לשלב חלוקה מוקדם/אמצעי — טווח מסחר אחרי עלייה עם מחזור מסחר יורד.
What happened after
26d ago · $271.99
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
26d ago · $265.97
Evidence: תבנית שמתאימה לשלב חלוקה מוקדם/אמצעי — טווח מסחר אחרי עלייה עם מחזור מסחר יורד.
What happened after
26d ago · $263.81
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
27d ago · $263.81
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
28d ago · $263.81
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $257.45
Evidence: +3.6pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
31d ago · $248.36
Evidence: 2 bullish / 6 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $251.52
Evidence: 5 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
54
$251.67
Now
46
$239.48
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
50
Value
33
Momentum
33
Risk
42
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
48
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING AJG...
Recent media coverage of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has primarily focused on its stock performance and business growth. Analysts highlight its underperformance relative to the financial services sector but maintain a bullish outlook, particularly due to strong organic growth in its Risk Management division, which outpaces its Brokerage segment. The company is also preparing for its upcoming quarterly investor meeting to discuss financial outlook and operations. Notably, a separate acquisition by a related entity (PFG) was mentioned, though unrelated to AJG’s direct business.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
94
Fundamentals
48
Technical
33
Valuation
33
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+12%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant overconfidence (score 45) stems from AJG’s extreme valuation (+131% above DCF) and disconnect between price momentum (-3.1%) and modest EPS growth (-0.1%). Euphoria (39) and herding (39) align with this, as traders overlook negative momentum in favor of positive sentiment (100/100) and relative underperformance. The narrative gap (35) widens reality (38) vs. optimism (73), suggesting traders may anchor to recent highs despite technical signals. The key question: *Will traders reassess fundamentals or double down on speculative positioning?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:08 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AJG's Risk Management business outpaces Brokerage, with strong organic growth, new business and retention supporting broader revenue growth."
"Do You Believe Arthur J. Gallagher (AJG) Could Deliver Mid-Teens EPS Growth for Years?"
"organic growth fueled by volume, retention and share gains"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, the model estimates that Smith and Nelson view AJG very positively—Smith’s high score suggests a long‑term hold, while Nelson’s score reflects a favorable cycle position near oversold levels. Mackay’s moderate score indicates some concern about crowd excitement, and the later investors such as Schwager, Marks, and Graham see the stock as lacking a clear edge or failing defensive criteria, with scores ranging from the low 30s to low teens. Lynch, Fisher, and Bogle‑type approaches assign low scores, flagging insufficient growth‑at‑a‑reasonable price, quality‑growth, or cheapness. The overall picture shows a split between early, cycle‑oriented investors who rate AJG highly and more cautious, risk‑focused investors who rate it poorly, reflecting their differing weightings of valuation, momentum, and qualitative factors.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 91
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 61
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 58
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 41
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 41
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 36
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 33
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 15
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 9
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 8
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$238.75
Range Bottom
$272.79
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
10.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
6.4%
ROA
2.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.83
Cash
$1.40B
Total Debt
$12.74B
Current Ratio
1.06
Debt/Equity
0.55
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.9.2026 | $0.700 |
| 5.6.2026 | $0.700 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.700 |
| 6.3.2026 | $0.700 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.700 |
| 5.12.2025 | $0.650 |
| 4.12.2025 | $0.650 |
| 5.9.2025 | $0.650 |
| 4.9.2025 | $0.650 |
| 6.6.2025 | $0.650 |
| 5.6.2025 | $0.650 |
| 7.3.2025 | $0.650 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$239.48
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$109.02
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-54.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
17.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.7% | $2.10B | $1.93B |
| 2 | 13.9% | $2.39B | $2.01B |
| 3 | 10.1% | $2.64B | $2.04B |
| 4 | 6.3% | $2.80B | $1.99B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $2.87B | $1.87B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.78B
Terminal Value
$45.29B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$29.44B
Enterprise Value
$39.27B
Net Debt
$11.35B
Equity Value
$27.92B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$91.06
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$38.88
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
StockStory · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Barchart · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AJG currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AJG's estimated fair value is $109.02, which is 54.5% below the current price of $239.48. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AJG's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 20.7%; Price is above the 200-day average; +9.9% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $109.02 vs. price $239.48 (-54.5%); Calmar: 0.01 (3y annualized return 0.5% / max drawdown 44.9%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -11.7%.
Yes — AJG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GALLAGHER J PATRICK JR | Gift | 8.9.2026 | 49,988 | -49,988 | — |
| Gallagher Patrick Murphy | Gift | 8.9.2026 | 49,988 | +49,988 | — |
| Hudson Scott R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 12,000 | +12,000 | $86.17 |
| Hudson Scott R | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 12,000 | -12,000 | $264.13 |
| Hudson Scott R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 12,000 | -12,000 | — |
| Miskel Christopher C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 152.672 | +152.672 | $262.00 |
| Bay Walter D. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 12,000 | -12,000 | $270.08 |
| Bay Walter D. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 71,292 | -12,000 | $270.08 |
| Mead Christopher E | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 19.8.2026 | 3,500 | -3,500 | — |
| Mead Christopher E | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 3,500 | -3,500 | $257.03 |
| Mead Christopher E | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 19.8.2026 | 3,500 | +3,500 | $86.17 |
| Bloom Mark H. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.8.2026 | 1,280.485 | -1,280.485 | — |
| Bloom Mark H. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.8.2026 | 606.814 | -606.814 | $251.21 |
| Bloom Mark H. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.8.2026 | 1,280.485 | +1,280.485 | — |
| Gallagher Patrick Murphy | Gift | 5.8.2026 | 23,800 | -23,800 | — |
| Gallagher Patrick Murphy | Gift | 5.8.2026 | 53,262 | -23,800 | — |
| Pesch Michael Robert | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 355.801 | -355.801 | — |
| Pesch Michael Robert | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 355.801 | +355.801 | $229.57 |
| GALLAGHER THOMAS JOSEPH | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 351.945 | -351.945 | — |
| Jain Vishal | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 2,162.694 | +2,162.694 | $229.57 |
| Jain Vishal | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 2,162.694 | -2,162.694 | — |
| GALLAGHER THOMAS JOSEPH | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 351.945 | +351.945 | $229.57 |
| GALLAGHER THOMAS JOSEPH | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 323,743 | +352 | $229.57 |
| GALLAGHER THOMAS JOSEPH | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 13,346 | -352 | — |
| Jain Vishal | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 68,903 | +2,163 | $229.57 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,692,130 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,242,351 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 65.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology