Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$20.80
▲ $0.00 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/16 07:38 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$1.72B
Day Range
$20.77 - $20.92
52-Week Range
$20.03 - $23.47
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
-9.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 15/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.20 (3y annualized return -4.1% / max drawdown 20.4%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
10d ago · $21.02
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 7 to 35 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
63
Value
60
Momentum
73
Risk
56
Sentiment
44
Fundamental
62
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of American Financial Group, Inc. has centered on its **investment-grade "baby bonds"**—specifically the **5.875% subordinated debentures due 2059**, which offer a **7.73% yield-to-maturity (YTM)** trading below par. Analysts highlight the bonds’ potential **13% upside** and strong credit rating, while a Q2 2026 earnings call and dividend updates were also noted, though no further operational or financial details were provided. The focus remains on bond performance and yield opportunities.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about American Financial Group, Inc. 5.875% Subordinated Debentures due 2059. News trend score: 44. Reason: 1 of the last 5 articles are negative, versus 0 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
13
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
64
Fundamentals
62
Technical
73
Valuation
60
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+2%
Market Narrative
43
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+1
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (86) reflects traders’ fixation on resistance, while FOMO (35) and herding (28) indicate momentum-driven participation. The narrow narrative-reality gap (2) suggests no extreme mispricing, but overconfidence (5) hints at overreaction to recent gains. The key question is whether the stock can sustain momentum or if traders will pivot when resistance is tested. Volatility and peer performance remain critical watchpoints.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 06:10 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"American Financial Group's baby bonds offer a 7.73% YTM, trading below par with investment-grade ratings and 13% upside"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock presents a stark divide between value-focused and growth-oriented methodologies. Benjamin Graham’s models—both Enterprising and Defensive—score near-perfectly, signaling a deep statistical discount and strong defensive traits, while Walter Bagehot’s liquidity framework also endorses it as resilient in credit stress. In contrast, growth-oriented investors like Philip Fisher and Peter Lynch dismiss it outright, as the stock lacks the signature quality and growth-at-a-reasonable-price traits they prioritized. Meanwhile, market efficiency proponents like Malkiel and Bogle see no clear edge over passive indexing, while cycle-sensitive analysts like Marks and Nelson flag it as either mid-cycle or overbought, leaving it in a gray area for trend-followers. The divergence highlights how value investors see opportunity where growth and efficiency skeptics see either indifference or risk.
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 98
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 92
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 91
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 80
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 77
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 69
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 67
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 54
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 37
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 32
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 21
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$20.19
Range Bottom
$21.27
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
13.1%
Net Margin
10.3%
EBITDA Margin
14.2%
ROE
17.5%
ROA
2.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$10.08
Cash
$1.73B
Total Debt
$1.82B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.38
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.367 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.367 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.367 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.367 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.367 |
| 14.12.2025 | $0.367 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.367 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.367 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.367 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.367 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.367 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.367 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$57.72
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$51.54
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 4 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 5 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
American Financial Group, Inc. 5.875% Subordinated Debentures due 2059 (AFGB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AFGB currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AFGB's technical score is 73/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 1.7% of price; Debt/equity: 0.38.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.20 (3y annualized return -4.1% / max drawdown 20.4%); Revenue growth (last year): -1.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -4.6%.
Yes — AFGB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 18 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hertzman Brian S. | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 950 | -950 | $142.87 |
| LINDNER CARL H III | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 81,373 | -81,373 | $144.28 |
| LINDNER CARL H III | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 8,627 | -8,627 | $144.66 |
| Weiss Mark A | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 2,813 | -2,813 | $144.76 |
| Gillis Michelle A | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 2,247 | -2,247 | $139.00 |
| Thompson David Lawrence Jr | Open Market Sale | 23.6.2026 | 11,370 | -11,370 | $135.05 |
| Murray Amy Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| VERITY WILLIAM W | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Martin Mary Beth | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Newport Roger K | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Nwankwo Evans N | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| VON LEHMAN JOHN I | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| JOSEPH GREGORY G | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Hertzman Brian S. | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 1,663 | -1,663 | $133.70 |
| Gillis Michelle A | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 3,012 | +3,012 | — |
| Hertzman Brian S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 3,163 | +3,163 | — |
| LINDNER CARL H III | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 11,294 | +11,294 | — |
| Thompson David Lawrence Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 4,706 | +4,706 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,999 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 22,423 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
65.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology