Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$2.90
▼ $0.08 (-2.7%)
Market data updated: 09/17 07:18 AM
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$2.82 - $2.90
52-Week Range
$1.23 - $5.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
ACCL is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-28.4% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 7/12 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 7.6% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
The stock carries an investorScore of 80 and a STRONG rating, driven primarily by a solid technical foundation and upbeat news flow, yet tempered by notable risk markers. Technically, the price sits above both the 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, and the RSI of 57.9 reflects healthy positive momentum, supporting the high technical score of 82. However, the negative MACD histogram and an %K reading of 81.3 signal that the asset may be entering overbought territory, hinting at possible short‑term weakness. News sentiment is exceptionally positive, with multiple mentions of unusual volume and industrial sector strength across pre‑market and after‑hours sessions, which underpins the strong news score of 92. Risk assessment is comparatively low, reflected in a score of 42, because the ATR represents 7.6 % of the price, indicating relatively high volatility that could amplify downside moves. The combination of bullish technical signals and favorable news outweighs the volatility concern, resulting in the overall strong investorScore, but the mixed technical indicators and volatility remain key cautions.
Price is above the 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, RSI is 57.9, but MACD histogram is negative and %K is 81.3 indicating overbought conditions.
These metrics together show current strength but also a potential for a short‑term pullback.
Several positive news items highlight unusual volume and multiple industrial stocks moving, with overall neutral to positive sentiment.
Positive news can sustain buying pressure and bolster momentum.
ATR equals 7.6 % of the price, suggesting notable price volatility.
Higher volatility raises the probability of larger price swings and potential losses.
StockIQ conclusion
The stock’s strong technical positioning and encouraging news environment drive its high investorScore, while elevated volatility and some bearish technical signs introduce caution. Monitoring momentum indicators and volatility levels will be key to understanding whether the current strength can be sustained.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
73
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $2.90
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $2.90
Evidence: 3.6x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $2.90
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $2.86
Evidence: -3.4pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $2.82
Evidence: attention score 63/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $2.98
Evidence: +5.8pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $2.98
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $2.98
Evidence: 3.6x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $2.98
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $2.67
Evidence: attention score 64/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $2.67
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 56)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $2.67
Evidence: -13.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $2.67
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $2.67
Evidence: 3.9x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $2.67
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $3.02
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 9 to 37 day-over-day
What happened after
7d ago · $3.02
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 0 to 28 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 11, 2026
Then
80
$2.67
Now
73
$2.90
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
71
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
🕵️ What the Detective found on ACCL
Detective Score 90/100 · 3 signals convergingOverall, the signals found here lean positive.
🧠 What the Detective thinks
3 signals are currently converging on ACCL at once — see each one broken down below, in plain language, with its own positive/negative read.
What this means now: Several different technical indicators are currently agreeing on the same direction at once — that's unusual; most days they contradict each other.
Why it matters: When several technical indicators agree at once, that's usually more reliable than any single indicator alone.
What this means now: Today's trading volume is significantly above the stock's normal average — a lot more buyers and sellers active in it than usual.
Why it matters: May indicate a significant change in trading activity, but doesn't allow a confident conclusion about price direction.
What this means now: The price has formed a distinct technical structure (a trading range, shakeout, or breakout) that the Wyckoff method treats as a key moment where big money is building or unwinding a position.
Why it matters: May provide an additional indication of trading structure, but is not proof of future direction.
📊 Historically, this signal type
This is not a prediction and not investment advice — just a plain-language read of real, already-computed signals. Full details: Stock Detective →
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Acco Group Holdings Limited. News trend score: 92. Reason: 7 of the last 8 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
43
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
—
Technical
71
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+75%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests **euphoria** is the dominant psychological state, driven by ACCL’s extreme overvaluation (+52.6% above its 200-day average). Despite neutral momentum (-5.0% ROC) and subdued volume, the disconnect between valuation and technicals may reflect overconfidence in fundamentals or a narrative gap where investors anchor to past highs. The lack of FOMO or panic signals (low volume, muted volatility) implies no urgency, but the narrative-reality gap (-12) hints at potential misalignment. The key question: *Is the premium justified by future catalysts, or will it correct as valuation strains against neutral RSI?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:08 PM
What could change this?
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 57/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here reveal a stark divide between technical and fundamental approaches to ACCL. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score suggests the stock’s cycle position is near oversold, signaling a potential buying opportunity based on momentum principles. In contrast, the majority of value-oriented investors—like Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, and Peter Lynch—lack sufficient data to form a clear verdict, leaving their models neutral. Meanwhile, behavioral and risk-aware frameworks, such as Morgan Housel’s and Gerald Loeb’s, flag volatility and risk as major concerns, while efficient-market theorists like Malkiel and Bogle dismiss the stock as unworthy of active selection. The split underscores that technical traders may see short-term promise, while fundamentalists and risk-conscious investors remain hesitant due to uncertainty or perceived danger.
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 35
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 33
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 26
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 19
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 229 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 8 articles.
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
ChartMill · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Acco Group Holdings Limited (ACCL) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for ACCL specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
ACCL's technical score is 71/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 54.9 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 7.6% of price; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; ROC 12 days: -0.9%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ACCL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
42,457 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 45,045 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
25.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 47.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology