Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$13.44
▲ $0.00 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/25 02:38 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/25/2026
News analyzed: 09/25/2026
Market Cap
$206.04M
Day Range
$13.28 - $13.53
52-Week Range
$13.07 - $31.70
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.12.2026
Support
$13.07
Resistance
$20.67
ZUMZ is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-31.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $35.86 vs. price $13.44 (+166.8%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
76
Quality
42
Value
67
Momentum
15
Risk
40
Sentiment
20
Fundamental
47
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Zumiez Inc. has centered on its fiscal performance and market positioning amid broader consumer retail concerns. Analysts anticipate a decline in Q2 earnings, while the company highlights growth from its private-label expansion and category momentum, including fresh brands and record private-label penetration. Stock declines in August were tied to broader retail caution, particularly after Walmart’s weaker-than-expected sales figures. Overall, Zumiez’s efforts to refresh its product offerings remain a focal point for sales momentum.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Zumiez Inc.. News trend score: 20. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 4 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
45
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
81
Fundamentals
47
Technical
15
Valuation
67
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-26%
Market Narrative
8
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
-28
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ZUMZ’s psychology is dominated by anchoring, as the stock’s proximity to support (4.3%) suggests traders are fixating on this level, possibly waiting for confirmation before acting. The absence of extreme states (e.g., panic or euphoria) and neutral volatility imply a cautious, patient stance. The narrative gap (4 points) hints at a slight disconnect between market perception and fundamentals, but no clear bias like overconfidence or loss aversion is active. The key question: *Will traders break above support, or will anchoring persist as a holding threshold?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:01 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Q2 Earnings Expected to Decline"
"Gains From Private Label Expansion & Category Momentum"
"Zumiez Inc. to Report Fiscal 2026 Second Quarter Results"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for ZUMZ reflects deep methodological disagreements about risk, growth, and valuation. Value-oriented investors like Benjamin Graham and Samuel Nelson see attractive entry points—Graham’s defensive approach and Nelson’s cycle timing both flag favorable conditions, while Howard Marks leans toward reasonable risk pricing. Meanwhile, growth-focused thinkers like Peter Lynch and Jack Schwager highlight upside potential, though Schwager’s disciplined setup contrasts with Philip Fisher’s skepticism, as Fisher’s high-bar quality/growth criteria aren’t met. At the other extreme, Jesse Livermore and Edgar Smith dismiss the stock outright—Livermore’s trend-following rule and Smith’s long-term stability test both reject it, while Thorstein Veblen’s and Burton Malkiel’s neutral-to-cautious stances underscore broader doubts about profitability and market efficiency. The middle ground, occupied by Morgan Housel and Gerald Loeb, suggests it’s holdable but not a slam dunk, illustrating how even moderate-risk methodologies struggle to align on ZUMZ’s merits.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 100
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 81
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 75
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 71
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 46
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 36
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 24
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
35.8%
Operating Margin
1.8%
Net Margin
1.4%
EBITDA Margin
4.1%
ROE
4.1%
ROA
2.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.80
Cash
$127.86M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.01
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$13.44
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$35.86
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+166.8%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-0.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.9% | $42.05M | $38.57M |
| 2 | -0.0% | $42.03M | $35.38M |
| 3 | 0.8% | $42.38M | $32.72M |
| 4 | 1.7% | $43.08M | $30.52M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $44.16M | $28.70M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$42.41M
Terminal Value
$696.33M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$452.57M
Enterprise Value
$618.47M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$618.47M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$18.80
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$17.00
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 7 neutral, 9 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
StockStory · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Motley Fool · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
ChartMill · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Motley Fool · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ZUMZ currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ZUMZ's estimated fair value is $35.86, which is 166.8% above the current price of $13.44. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ZUMZ's technical score is 15/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $35.86 vs. price $13.44 (+166.8%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 966.7%; Free cash flow growth: 644.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.4% of price; Calmar: -0.15 (3y annualized return -9.0% / max drawdown 60.2%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ZUMZ.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valletta Liliana Gil | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 540 | -540 | $18.64 |
| Valletta Liliana Gil | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 5,264 | -540 | $18.64 |
| Valletta Liliana Gil | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 1,319 | -1,319 | $18.81 |
| Valletta Liliana Gil | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 5,804 | -1,319 | $18.81 |
| Valletta Liliana Gil | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 3,841 | -3,841 | $18.82 |
| Valletta Liliana Gil | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 7,123 | -3,841 | $18.82 |
| Valletta Liliana Gil | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 300 | -300 | $19.41 |
| Valletta Liliana Gil | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 10,964 | -300 | $19.41 |
| Louden Steve | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 4,110 | +4,110 | — |
| Harkless Guy Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 4,110 | +4,110 | — |
| Bauza Carmen | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 4,110 | +4,110 | — |
| Smith Travis | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 4,110 | +4,110 | — |
| Murphy James P. | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 4,110 | +4,110 | — |
| Valletta Liliana Gil | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 4,110 | +4,110 | — |
| Smith Travis | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 27,064 | +4,110 | — |
| Murphy James P. | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 32,231 | +4,110 | — |
| Louden Steve | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 29,335 | +4,110 | — |
| Valletta Liliana Gil | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 11,264 | +4,110 | — |
| Bauza Carmen | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 14,519 | +4,110 | — |
| Harkless Guy Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 18,495 | +4,110 | — |
| Visser Chris K. | Open Market Sale | 1.4.2026 | 9,974 | -9,974 | $22.21 |
| Visser Chris K. | Open Market Sale | 1.4.2026 | 43,500 | -9,974 | $22.21 |
| ELLIS ADAM CHRISTOPHER | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.3.2026 | 7,507 | -7,507 | — |
| Visser Chris K. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 18.3.2026 | 1,371 | -1,371 | $21.17 |
| Work Christopher Codington | Tax Withholding in Shares | 18.3.2026 | 1,981 | -1,981 | $21.17 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,557,116 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,425,010 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
65.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology