Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$17.86
▲ $0.59 (+3.4%)
Market data updated: 09/17 05:53 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$693.63M
Day Range
$17.30 - $18.38
52-Week Range
$10.51 - $46.87
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
-14.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 66.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -33.9% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
26
Risk
46
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
39
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of WhiteFiber, Inc. highlights its focus on AI-optimized data centers and GPU cloud services, with strong revenue growth in colocation and cloud sectors. The company has secured a $270 million funding round and a 100MW AI infrastructure deal with Krambu, though its stock has faced volatility amid high short interest and mixed investor sentiment. Analysts remain cautiously optimistic, with some upgrading the stock to "Buy," while others question execution risks.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about WhiteFiber, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
39
Technical
26
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-54%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+21
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant **Loss Aversion** (51) reflects a cautious stance after an 8.6% decline, despite extreme positive sentiment (100/100). Overconfidence (38) hints at traders ignoring fundamental underperformance, while FOMO/Euphoria remain muted due to weak momentum. The **narrative-reality gap (26)** suggests traders may be overestimating upside potential. The key question: Will traders double down on positive sentiment, or will the -16.6% EPS gap trigger a re-evaluation?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 05:20 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"WhiteFiber’s August 12 filing showed that second-quarter colocation and cloud-services revenue both increased"
"6.04 million shares were sold short at the August 14 settlement"
"HC Wainwright & Co. analyst assumes Whitefiber with a Buy rating and announces Price Target of $37"
"WhiteFiber (WYFI) is back on investor radar after completing a $270 million Rule 144A convertible bond offering and securing a Krambu partnership"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria, the model estimates the stock is attractive with a high score, while his enterprising screen still finds a statistical discount but is less enthusiastic, reflecting Graham’s stricter margin‑of‑safety emphasis. Walter Bagehot and Charles Mackay rate the company favorably for liquidity and lack of crowd mania, respectively, underscoring their focus on financial stability and market sentiment rather than growth prospects. In contrast, Philip Fisher, Jesse Livermore, and Thorstein Veblen assign low scores, indicating the stock lacks the durable growth qualities, trending strength, and substantive consumer‑driven value they each demand. Meanwhile, mid‑range scores from Howard Marks, Samuel Nelson, and Peter Lynch illustrate how cycle positioning and modest growth expectations produce mixed but generally cautious views across different methodological lenses.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 87
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 85
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 82
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 75
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 54
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 51
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 45
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 26
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
60.2%
Operating Margin
-33.9%
Net Margin
-31.2%
EBITDA Margin
-4.3%
ROE
-5.1%
ROA
-3.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.78
Cash
$114.44M
Total Debt
$20.00M
Current Ratio
2.03
Debt/Equity
0.04
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$17.86
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$176.96
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-278.43M | $-255.44M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-332.38M | $-279.76M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-378.08M | $-291.95M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-408.80M | $-289.61M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-419.02M | $-272.34M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-222.75M
Terminal Value
$-6.61B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-4.29B
Enterprise Value
$-5.68B
Net Debt
$-94.44M
Equity Value
$-5.59B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$15.28
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.23
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Stocktwits · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 5.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 24.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 23.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.8.2026
Benzinga · 22.8.2026
MT Newswires · 21.8.2026
PR Newswire · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
MT Newswires · 19.8.2026
Investor's Business Daily · 19.8.2026
ChartMill · 19.8.2026
WhiteFiber, Inc. (WYFI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WYFI currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
WYFI's technical score is 26/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 66.2%; Debt/equity: 0.04; Current ratio: 2.03.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -33.9% (negative); Net margin: -31.2% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for WYFI.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shih Ichi | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 4,657 | +4,657 | — |
| Shih Ichi | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 4,657 | +4,657 | — |
| Zhu Justin | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 4,219 | +4,219 | — |
| Zhu Justin | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 13,701 | +4,219 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.7.2026 | 7,079 | +7,079 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 7,079 | +7,079 | — |
| Huang Erke | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 7,079 | +7,079 | — |
| Huang Erke | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.7.2026 | 7,079 | +7,079 | — |
| Huang Erke | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.7.2026 | 203,390 | +7,079 | — |
| Huang Erke | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 7,079 | +7,079 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.7.2026 | 229,166 | +7,079 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 7,079 | +7,079 | — |
| Shih Ichi | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 7,059 | -7,059 | $30.12 |
| Sanfilippo Thomas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.5.2026 | 955 | -955 | $21.00 |
| Sanfilippo Thomas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.5.2026 | 17,320 | -955 | $21.00 |
| Krassakopoulos Billy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 8,490 | -8,490 | — |
| Krassakopoulos Billy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 18,937 | -8,490 | — |
| Huang Erke | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.3.2026 | 41,982 | +41,982 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.3.2026 | 41,982 | +41,982 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 41,982 | +41,982 | — |
| Huang Erke | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 41,982 | +41,982 | — |
| Huang Erke | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.3.2026 | 196,311 | +41,982 | — |
| Huang Erke | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 41,982 | +41,982 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.3.2026 | 222,087 | +41,982 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 41,982 | +41,982 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,276,078 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,466,603 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology