Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$311.77
▲ $6.41 (+2.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:55 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$304.09 - $314.30
52-Week Range
$295.75 - $459.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
15.10.2026
Support
$295.75
Resistance
$400.09
WSO is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-18.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $209.68 vs. price $311.77 (-32.7%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
35
Risk
48
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
62
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Watsco, Inc. (WSO) has been limited but focused on its stock performance and market positioning. Analysts briefly examined its modest 0.8% gain since its latest earnings report, questioning whether the upward trend could persist amid broader market scrutiny of industrials. No substantive company-specific developments were highlighted beyond general industry trends and speculative investor discussions.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Watsco, Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
62
Technical
35
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-22%
Market Narrative
72
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+32
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for WSO suggests a dominant **herding** dynamic, where participants appear to be cautiously aligning with peer movements rather than acting on isolated signals. The **overconfidence** and **confirmation bias** scores further imply investors may be selectively interpreting narratives while overlooking stagnant fundamentals. The **loss aversion** score hints at lingering hesitation after recent declines, though the **euphoria** score—despite overvaluation—reflects residual optimism. The key open question is whether the narrative-reality gap will widen or narrow as fundamentals stabilize, potentially shifting behavior from detached optimism to more grounded reassessment.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:39 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"industry has shed 1.2% over the past six months"
"Each has tumbled to its lowest point in 12 months"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 18/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for this stock reflects deep methodological disagreements about risk, timing, and valuation. Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score highlights his focus on liquidity and resilience, suggesting the stock could weather financial stress—something no other framework prioritizes. Meanwhile, disciplined traders like Jack Schwager and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) see a favorable setup, balancing risk and reward or positioning it early in a cycle, while others like Jesse Livermore and Samuel Armstrong Nelson flag overbought conditions or trend resistance. On the valuation side, Graham’s strict criteria and Lynch’s growth-at-a-reasonable-price rule dismiss it outright, contrasting with Marks’ mixed but cautiously optimistic take. Even Fisher and Bogle’s efficiency skepticism clash with Bagehot’s liquidity-driven optimism, illustrating how macroeconomic stability vs. microeconomic fundamentals or market efficiency can lead to wildly different conclusions.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 73
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 58
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 55
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 23
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 20
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 18
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 18
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
28.0%
Operating Margin
10.0%
Net Margin
6.9%
EBITDA Margin
10.6%
ROE
17.9%
ROA
11.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$12.27
Cash
$433.28M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
4.12
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 16.7.2026 | $3.300 |
| 15.7.2026 | $3.300 |
| 16.4.2026 | $3.300 |
| 15.4.2026 | $3.300 |
| 16.1.2026 | $3.000 |
| 15.1.2026 | $3.000 |
| 16.10.2025 | $3.000 |
| 15.10.2025 | $3.000 |
| 16.7.2025 | $3.000 |
| 15.7.2025 | $3.000 |
| 15.4.2025 | $3.000 |
| 14.4.2025 | $3.000 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$311.77
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$209.68
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-32.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-0.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.1% | $534.61M | $490.47M |
| 2 | 0.6% | $537.62M | $452.50M |
| 3 | 1.2% | $544.11M | $420.15M |
| 4 | 1.9% | $554.20M | $392.61M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $568.05M | $369.20M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$535.06M
Terminal Value
$8.96B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.82B
Enterprise Value
$7.95B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$7.95B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$73.39
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$55.63
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
PR Newswire · 26.8.2026
Watsco, Inc. (WSO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WSO currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, WSO's estimated fair value is $209.68, which is 32.7% below the current price of $311.77. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
WSO's technical score is 35/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 4.12; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $209.68 vs. price $311.77 (-32.7%); Calmar: -0.09 (3y annualized return -4.3% / max drawdown 46.9%); Revenue growth (last year): -5.0%.
Yes — WSO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nahmad Aaron J | Other Transaction | 11.3.2026 | 25 | +25 | $336.95 |
| LOGAN BARRY S | Other Transaction | 11.3.2026 | 19 | +19 | $336.95 |
| NAHMAD ALBERT H | Other Transaction | 11.3.2026 | 25 | +25 | $336.95 |
| MENENDEZ ANA M | Other Transaction | 11.3.2026 | 25 | +25 | $336.95 |
| NAHMAD ALBERT H | Other Transaction | 11.3.2026 | 92 | +25 | $336.95 |
| Nahmad Aaron J | Other Transaction | 11.3.2026 | 526 | +25 | $336.95 |
| LOGAN BARRY S | Other Transaction | 11.3.2026 | 1,802 | +19 | $336.95 |
| MENENDEZ ANA M | Other Transaction | 11.3.2026 | 1,573 | +25 | $336.95 |
| Nahmad Aaron J | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.1.2026 | 13,955 | +13,955 | $338.85 |
| Nahmad Aaron J | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.1.2026 | 305,993 | +13,955 | $338.85 |
| Lopez-Blazquez Ana | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.12.2025 | 707 | -707 | $354.61 |
| Lopez-Blazquez Ana | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.12.2025 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $250.84 |
| Lopez-Blazquez Ana | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.12.2025 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $250.84 |
| Lopez-Blazquez Ana | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.12.2025 | 293 | -707 | $354.61 |
| Lopez-Blazquez Ana | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.12.2025 | 0 | -1,000 | $250.84 |
| Dickins Denise | Gift | 5.12.2025 | 269 | -269 | — |
| Dickins Denise | Gift | 5.12.2025 | 21,638 | -269 | — |
| Tapella Gary L | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2025 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $484.69 |
| Custer John Michael | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2025 | 2,200 | -2,200 | $448.27 |
| Dickins Denise | Gift | 15.5.2025 | 191 | -191 | — |
| Dickins Denise | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2025 | 4,500 | -4,500 | $175.07 |
| Dickins Denise | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.5.2025 | 1,624 | -1,624 | $484.84 |
| Dickins Denise | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2025 | 4,500 | +4,500 | $175.07 |
| Nahmad Aaron J | Other Transaction | 13.3.2025 | 18 | +18 | $473.89 |
| LOGAN BARRY S | Other Transaction | 13.3.2025 | 13 | +13 | $473.89 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,941,524 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,535,635 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
76.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 80.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology