Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$995.29
▲ $6.15 (+0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/16 07:19 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$62.35B
Day Range
$989.50 - $1,024.99
52-Week Range
$701.59 - $1,179.18
Beta
—
Next Earnings
20.10.2026
URI is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+3.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.94
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
22
Risk
36
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
61
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING URI...
Recent media coverage of United Rentals has centered on its stock performance and valuation amid market fluctuations. Analysts discuss whether the company’s shares are undervalued after a recent pullback—with mixed returns over short and long periods—while highlighting its strong five-year growth. The focus also includes its AI-driven Equipment Agent tool, which reportedly improves customer efficiency by 70%, and its upcoming industry conference participation. Sector comparisons with peers like Quanex Building Products and broader construction trends are also noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about United Rentals. News trend score: 80. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
43
Fundamentals
61
Technical
22
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-8%
Market Narrative
52
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
URI’s psychology score (19) reflects a fragmented market mindset, with **euphoria** and **panic selling** tied at 19—likely artifacts of positive sentiment (100/100) clashing with weak momentum (-7.1% ROC) and neutral RSI (38). The narrative gap (16) suggests investors may overestimate positive catalysts despite technical signals leaning toward consolidation. Key open question: *Is the 100/100 sentiment masking latent caution, or will momentum divergence (price vs. fundamentals) trigger rebalancing?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:32 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"How United Rentals Stock Has Been Trading... compared to their sector so far this year"
"United Rentals shows a year to date gain of 19.5% and a 1 year total return of 4.4%"
"AI-enabled Equipment Agent... led to a 70% enhancement in users’ ability to find equipment"
"United Rentals has outperformed the market over the past 20 years by 11.63% on an annualized basis"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 84/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some models seeing clear opportunities while others flag it as a high-risk or overvalued bet. The highest-scoring approaches—like Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cycle analysis (86) and Jack Schwager’s disciplined setup (73)—suggest it’s either near a bottom or offers a favorable risk-reward trade, contrasting sharply with the ultra-cautious stances of Benjamin Graham (0) and Walter Bagehot (8), who dismiss it as statistically unsafe or illiquid. Meanwhile, Fisher (51) and Smith (50) see it as solid but not exceptional, while the efficient-market camp (43) questions whether active picking beats passive indexing. The split highlights a tension between cyclical/technical optimism and deep-value or defensive skepticism, with only a handful of methodologies leaning toward cautious engagement.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 84
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 73
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 61
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 51
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 48
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 26
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 22
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 20
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 8
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 4
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
38.2%
Operating Margin
24.7%
Net Margin
15.5%
EBITDA Margin
27.4%
ROE
27.8%
ROA
8.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$38.71
Cash
$459.00M
Total Debt
$15.88B
Current Ratio
0.94
Debt/Equity
1.77
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 12.8.2026 | $1.970 |
| 13.5.2026 | $1.970 |
| 12.5.2026 | $1.970 |
| 11.2.2026 | $1.970 |
| 10.2.2026 | $1.970 |
| 12.11.2025 | $1.790 |
| 11.11.2025 | $1.790 |
| 13.8.2025 | $1.790 |
| 12.8.2025 | $1.790 |
| 14.5.2025 | $1.790 |
| 13.5.2025 | $1.790 |
| 12.2.2025 | $1.790 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$138.81
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$21.24
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 5 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Fintel · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
CNW Group · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
The Fly · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Barchart · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
StockStory · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
United Rentals (URI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
URI currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
URI's technical score is 22/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 27.8% — strong; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.94; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -0.2%; Net income growth: -3.1%.
Yes — URI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grace William E. | Open Market Sale | 24.7.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $1,133.15 |
| Grace William E. | Open Market Sale | 24.7.2026 | 6,062 | -1,500 | $1,133.15 |
| Bruno Marc A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 34 | +34 | $1,132.89 |
| Bruno Marc A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 7,745 | +34 | $1,132.89 |
| HEUER BRANDT JULIE M | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 203 | +203 | $937.00 |
| Kelly Terri L. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 203 | +203 | $937.00 |
| Lopez-Balboa Francisco J | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 203 | +203 | $937.00 |
| De Shon Larry D | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 203 | +203 | $937.00 |
| Singh Shiv | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 203 | +203 | $937.00 |
| Jones Kim Harris | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 203 | +203 | $937.00 |
| Bruno Marc A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 203 | +203 | $937.00 |
| Taussig Alexander R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 203 | +203 | $937.00 |
| MARTORE GRACIA C | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 203 | +203 | $937.00 |
| MARTORE GRACIA C | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 7,242 | +203 | $937.00 |
| HEUER BRANDT JULIE M | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 563 | +203 | $937.00 |
| Bruno Marc A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 7,711 | +203 | $937.00 |
| De Shon Larry D | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 2,123 | +203 | $937.00 |
| Jones Kim Harris | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 5,291 | +203 | $937.00 |
| Kelly Terri L. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 6,990 | +203 | $937.00 |
| Lopez-Balboa Francisco J | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 1,605 | +203 | $937.00 |
| Singh Shiv | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 7,803 | +203 | $937.00 |
| Taussig Alexander R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 260 | +203 | $937.00 |
| MARTORE GRACIA C | Disposition to the Company | 4.5.2026 | 213 | -213 | $925.21 |
| MARTORE GRACIA C | Disposition to the Company | 4.5.2026 | 7,039 | -213 | $925.21 |
| PINTOFF CRAIG ADAM | Open Market Sale | 27.4.2026 | 2,466 | -2,466 | $963.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,428,713 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,395,597 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology